Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAK LatarBelakangDelayedgraftfunction(DGF)adalahkomplikasiyangumumdijumpaipadatransplantasidarimayat.Berdasarkanstuditerdahulu,DGFdanfactorresikonyamemilikihasilyangbervariasipadadonornefrektomihidupMetodePenelitimelakukananalisisretrospektifdarirekammedicdonordanresipientransplantasiginjalpada100kasuslaparoskopidonornefrektomihidupdiRumahSakitCiptoMangunkusumodariNovember2011hinggaFebruari2014.KriteriaDGFadalahpasiendidialisispada1minggupostoperasidan/ataukreatininlebihdari2.5mg/dlpadaharike7postoperasi.PasienyangtidakmasukdalamkriteriatersebutdidefinisikanmemilikirenalallograftyangberfungsinormalHasilPrevalensiDGFpadapenelitianiniadalah14%.Indeksmassatubuhresipien,coldischemiatime,waktuanastomosisvaskular,dantotalischemiatimelebihtinggipadagrupDGF,tetapitidakditemukanfaktorresikoDGFyangsignifikansecarastatisticsaatdilakukananalisismultivariatKesimpulanInsidensiDGFpadastudiinimasukdalamrentangyangdiamatipadastudi-­‐studisebelumnya.FaktorresikoyangdilaporkansebagaifaktorresikoDGFpadalaparoskopidonornefrektomihiduptidaksignifikansecarastatistikdenganDGFpadastudikaliini.

---

ABSTRACTBackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication affecting deceaseddonor renal transplantation. Based on previous studies, DGF and its risk factors inlive donor nephrectomy (LDN) have a various results.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of donor and recipient from ourfirst 100 cases of laparoscopic LDN in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital fromNovember 2011 to February 2014. The criteria used to define DGF were therequirement for dialysis in postoperative week 1 and/or serum creatinine greaterthan 2.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 7. Patients who did not match any of thesecriteria were define as having normal renal allograft function.ResultsThe overall prevalence of DGF was 14%. Recipients body mass index, coldischemia time, vascular anastomosis time, and total ischemia time were higheramong the delayed graft function group, but no risk factors for DGF weresignificantly associated after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe incidence of DGF in our study was in the range of that observed in previousstudies. The factors that previously reported and believed as risk factors of DGFin laparoscopic LDN were not significantly associated with the development ofDGF in our study.;BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication affecting deceaseddonor renal transplantation. Based on previous studies, DGF and its risk factors inlive donor nephrectomy (LDN) have a various results.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of donor and recipient from ourfirst 100 cases of laparoscopic LDN in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital fromNovember 2011 to February 2014. The criteria used to define DGF were therequirement for dialysis in postoperative week 1 and/or serum creatinine greaterthan 2.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 7. Patients who did not match any of thesecriteria were define as having normal renal allograft function.ResultsThe overall prevalence of DGF was 14%. Recipients body mass index, coldischemia time, vascular anastomosis time, and total ischemia time were higheramong the delayed graft function group, but no risk factors for DGF weresignificantly associated after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe incidence of DGF in our study was in the range of that observed in previousstudies. The factors that previously reported and believed as risk factors of DGFin laparoscopic LDN were not significantly associated with the development ofDGF in our study.;BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication affecting deceaseddonor renal transplantation. Based on previous studies, DGF and its risk factors inlive donor nephrectomy (LDN) have a various results.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of donor and recipient from ourfirst 100 cases of laparoscopic LDN in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital fromNovember 2011 to February 2014. The criteria used to define DGF were therequirement for dialysis in postoperative week 1 and/or serum creatinine greaterthan 2.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 7. Patients who did not match any of thesecriteria were define as having normal renal allograft function.ResultsThe overall prevalence of DGF was 14%. Recipients body mass index, coldischemia time, vascular anastomosis time, and total ischemia time were higheramong the delayed graft function group, but no risk factors for DGF weresignificantly associated after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe incidence of DGF in our study was in the range of that observed in previousstudies. The factors that previously reported and believed as risk factors of DGFin laparoscopic LDN were not significantly associated with the development ofDGF in our study., BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication affecting deceaseddonor renal transplantation. Based on previous studies, DGF and its risk factors inlive donor nephrectomy (LDN) have a various results.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of donor and recipient from ourfirst 100 cases of laparoscopic LDN in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital fromNovember 2011 to February 2014. The criteria used to define DGF were therequirement for dialysis in postoperative week 1 and/or serum creatinine greaterthan 2.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 7. Patients who did not match any of thesecriteria were define as having normal renal allograft function.ResultsThe overall prevalence of DGF was 14%. Recipients body mass index, coldischemia time, vascular anastomosis time, and total ischemia time were higheramong the delayed graft function group, but no risk factors for DGF weresignificantly associated after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe incidence of DGF in our study was in the range of that observed in previousstudies. The factors that previously reported and believed as risk factors of DGFin laparoscopic LDN were not significantly associated with the development ofDGF in our study.]"

"ABSTRACTBackground: resistive index (RI) is highly utilised to assess the graft function using Doppler ultrasonography. The RI has been shown as the best ultrasound parameter to assess kidney allograft dysfunction. Several studies have established the role of the RI as a predictor of transplant failure. However, these studies were using RI measurement in the later stages post transplantation. The present study has conducted to identify the association between early RI measurement and early graft function represented as delayed graft function (DGF) and immediate graft function (IGF), as well as long-term graft survival. Methods: an evidence based clinical review of studies published before May 2018 was conducted from Medline, Science Direct, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Studies on early measurement of RI whereby the primary or secondary goals of the study related to graft function and/or graft survival were included. Studies using late RI measurement and without RI value groups were excluded. The Mantzel Haenzel method was used to analyse pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval, while the heterogeneity of the study was calculated through I2 value. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: nine studies with a total of 1802 patients who had undergone a kidney transplant were analysed. DGF was found in 19% (193/1015) of the low RI group and in 42.8% (337/787) of the high RI group (RR 2.04 (95% CI 1.72 - 2.41), p < 0.00001, I2 = 28%). IGF was found in 39.5% (62/157) of the low RI group and in 10.5% (28/268) of the high RI group (RR 0.26 (95% CI 0.17 0.40), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Long term graft survival, with follow up between 60 144 months, was found in 83% (701/845) of the low RI group and in 69.4% (395/569) of the high RI group (RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.72 0.93), p = 0.002, I2 = 63%). Conclusion: the results of this study emphasise the association between early measurement of RI and early graft function, and longterm graft survival. An elevated RI provides the chance of recognizing the patients with poor longterm prognosis, from the first moment after kidney transplant."

"ABSTRACTPada pasien penyakit ginjal tahap akhir, transplantasi ginjal merupakan pilihan terbaik bagi pasien; akan tetapi, delayed graft function dapat menjadi komplikasi bagi pasien yang dapat berkembang menjadi rejeksi (penolakan) terhadap organ donor, sehingga menggagalkan transplantasi. Tujuan: Mengetahui hubungan antara faktor intraoperatif (warm ischemia time 1, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time 2, waktu urin keluar, dan kompleksitas pembuluh darah) dan kejadian delayed graft function pada resipien. Metode: Peneliti melakukan studi potong-lintang dengan mengambil 611 data rekam medis pasien dari data rekapitulasi transplantasi ginjal di Departemen Urologi, Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo, dari rentang waktu November 2011-September 2018. Peneliti kemudian melakukan analisis bivariat dan multivariat untuk menentukan signifikansi hubungan variabel. Hasil: Dari lima variabel yang diteliti, tidak terdapat satu pun variabel yang memiliki hubungan signifikan (p = 0,996; p = 0,125; p = 0,677; p = 0,332; p = 0,748; secara berurutan) dengan kejadian delayed graft function, dari total 545 pasien yang diteliti. Diskusi: Hubungan variabel yang tidak signifikan dapat dijelaskan oleh jenis donor pada penelitian ini yang sepenuhnya donor hidup, sehingga meminimalkan dampak buruk dari stress iskemik dan reperfusion injury yang disebabkan oleh faktor intraoperatif.

---

ABSTRACTFor patients with end-stage renal disease, transplantation is the best option for renal replacement therapy; however, Delayed Graft Function can complicates the transplantation, and even progresses into organ rejection, resulting in a failed transplantation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between intraoperative factors (warm ischemia time 1, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time 2, time of first urine output, and blood vessels complexity) and delayed graft function in transplant recipient. Methods: Researcher used cross-sectional study design by collecting 611 patient data of medical record from data recapitulation of renal transplant by Departemen of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, from November 2011-September 2018. Selected patient data were then analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: From five variables in this study, none of them have significant association (p = 0,996; p = 0,125; p = 0,677; p = 0,332; p = 748; respectively) with delayed graft function, from a total of 545 patients. Discussion: The insignificant association of variables may be explained by the type of donor in this study, that is compromised entirely of living donor, which reduce the negative impact of ischemic stress and reperfusion injury caused by the intraoperative factors."