Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
An increase in the number of corruption cases in the goods and services procurement at government agencies in Indonesia causes the country to suffer significant losses. This condition proves the non-compliance of the goods and services procurement officials with the code of ethics for the imple-mentation of goods and services procurement. Corruption cases in the goods and services procure-ment tend to involve goods and services procurement officials, both as Budget User Authorities, Commitment Making Officials, and Technical Implementation Activities Officials. In other words, officials (superiors) use their authority to commit fraud in the goods and services procurement. The purpose of this study is to determine and evaluate the role of the code of ethics on the influence of superior authorities on fraudulent acts in goods and services procurement of government agencies in Indonesia. This study used the laboratory experiments method with the accounting students of Pattimura University, Ambon as the participants and a two-way ANOVA with a 2x3 factorial experi-mental design as a data analysis technique. The results of this study show that superior authority plays an important role in influencing the occurrence of fraudulent acts in the goods and services procurement, and a code of ethics can reduce it. There is a difference in the tendency to commit fraud in the goods and services procurement when there is a superior authority and no superior au-thority. The tendency to commit fraud will be smaller for individuals who are asked to read the code of ethics and signatures it compared to only reading the code of ethics and without a code of ethics.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai rangkaian perbuatan seperti apa yang dapat dikatakan dengan Penipuan dengan membahas definisi Penipuan menurut para ahli dan pertimbangan hakim. Penipuan dalam perjanjian sering terjadi dan menjadi permasalahan hukum antara dua pihak yang saling mengikatkan diri namun adanya fakta yang telah disembunyikan sehingga mempengaruhi keputusan untuk mengikatkan diri dalam perjanjian. Tujuan khusus dari penulisan ini untuk mengklarifikasi rangkaian perbuatan yang dapat dikatakan sebagai penipuan berdasarkan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata dan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana serta menganalisa putusan putusan pengadilan mengenai perbuatan perbuatan salah satu pihak yang didalilkan melakukan penipuan dan bagaimana hakim mempertimbangkan suatu penipuan perjanjian tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan bentuk penelitian yuridis normatif dan tipe penelitian yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan deskriptif analitis. Kesimpulan dari penulisan ini menjabarkan bahwa penipuan memiliki definisi yang beragam karena dibahas dalam Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata, Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana, Penipuan menurut Common Law, dan penipuan menurut para ahli. Rangkaian perbuatan penipuan adalah perbuatan yang dapat menggerakkan orang lain/ membujuk orang lain dengan alat penggerak seperti akal/ tipu muslihat, karangan perkataan bohong, nama palsu dan keadaan palsu. Serta adanya macam macam pertimbangan hakim mengenai pembuktian dan definisi dari penipuan. Penerapn definisi penipuan dalam hubungan kontraktual dapat diterapkan dalam rancangan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum perdata dan pengadilan dapat memiliki konsep dan pemahaman yang sama mengenai definisi penipuan dan rangkaian perbuatan penipuan.

---

This thesis discussed about a series of fraudulent acts that define as a misrepresentation by defining definition according to the experts and judges considerations. Misrepresentation in agreements often occurs and becomes a legal problem between two parties that mutually binding but there are facts that has been hidden which affect the decision to binding themselves in agreement. The specific purpose of this thesis is to clarify a series of fraudulent acts that can be regarded as a misrepresentation according to the Civil Code and Criminal Law and analysed court decisions which discussed about one of the parties that perform a series of fraudulent acts and how the judges considered a fraud agreement. This research was conducted using the form of normative juridical research and the type of research carried out using analytical descriptive. The conclusion of this thesis was, misrepresentation has a many definitions because it is discussed in the Civil Code, Criminal Code, Fraud based on Common Law, and Fraud based on experts. A series of fraudulent acts are actions that can persuade others with false statement of fact, false representations, false names and false conditions. Moreover, there were a various kinds of judges' considerations regarding proof and definition of misrepresentation. The use of misrepresentation definition in contractual relationships can be applied in the draft Civil Code. Therefore, the court can have the same concept and understanding of the misrepresentation definition and a series of fraudulent acts.