Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis hubungan antara kualitas laporan keuangan dan keragaman gender dengan efisiensi investasi pada perusahaan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan 936 observasi dari perusahaan Indonesia yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2012-2014. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kualitas laporan keuangan yang tinggi cenderung dapat memitigasi terjadinya overinvestment dan underinvestment. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa keberadaan perempuan dalam jajaran dewan direksi cenderung menyebabkan perusahaan mengalami inefisiensi investasi. ......The main objective of this research is to analyze the relationship between financial reporting quality and gender diversity with investment efficiency in Indonesia. This research uses 936 observation sample from listed companies in Indonesia from 2012-2014. This study finds that high quality financial report is able to mitigate overinvestment and underinvestment. This study also found that gender diversity tends to cause inefficiency investment.

Abstrak :
Tingginya cost of equity yang ditanggung oleh perusahaan, dapat berarti pula bahwa, tinggi pula tingkat pengembalian yang disyaratkan oleh investor. Laporan keuangan perusahaan menjadi sumber informasi utama investor dalam menilai tingkat risiko investasi perusahaan. Ketika terjadinya ketidaksamaan informasi yang dimiliki antar investor, mendorong terjadinya asimetri informasi. Perusahaan dapat mengurangi asimetri informasi dengan salah satunya melakukan peningkatan pada kualitas laporan keuangan perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana pengaruh dari financial reporting quality terhadap cost of equity dengan adanya peran dari information asymmetry, pada perusahaan non keuangan di Indonesia. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode data panel dan variabel kontrol berupa size, leverage, growth dan dispersion. Hasilnya adalah perusahaan yang meningkatkan keterbukaan informasi keuangannya cenderung mengurangi asimetri informasi, namun, tidak dapat mempengaruhi secara langsung hubungan antara financial reporting quality dengan cost of equity bagi perusahaan non keuangan di Indonesia. ......The higher cost of equity which is borne by the company, may mean that, the higher the rate of return required by investors. The financial reporting of the company is main source of information in when investor assess the level of risk when investing in a company. When the inequality between the information held by investors, pushing the asymmetry of information. Companies can reduce information asymmetry with making improvements to the quality of the company's financial reporting. This study aims to see how the effects of the financial reporting quality of the cost of equity with the role of information asymmetry, non financial firms in Indonesia, using panel data and control variables such as size, leverage, growth and dispersion. The result is a company that increases its financial information disclosure tends to reduce the asymmetry of information, however, information asymmetry can not affect directly the relationship between financial reporting quality with a cost of equity for non financial companies in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas tentang pengaruh kualitas dari komite audit, audit internal dan audit eksternal terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan. Kualitas komite audit diukur menggunakan komponen persentase anggota yang memiliki keahlian keuangan, jumlah rapat yang dilaksanakan, serta rata-rata persentase kehadiran anggota pada rapat internal. Kualitas audit internal diukur menggunakan komponen pengalaman audit dan sertifikasi audit yang dimiliki oleh ketua unit audit internal, serta menambahkan komponen jumlah anggota audit internal. Kualitas audit eksternal diukur menggunakan komponen masa audit, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, serta biaya audit atas jasa audit oleh audit eksternal. Ketiga variabel tersebut diuji pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan menggunakan tiga dimensi model pengujian, yakni dimensi relevansi, dimensi representasi tepat dan dimensi netralitas. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa adanya pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara kualitas audit internal dan audit eksternal terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan, namun hasil pengujian pengaruh kualitas komite audit terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan menunjukkan hasil yang tidak signifikan. Hasil pengujian joint effect menunjukkan adanya pengaruh positif dan signifikan pada hubungan dua arah antara komite audit dengan audit eksternal dan hubungan tiga arah antara komite audit, audit internal, dan audit eksternal terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan. ......This study aims to examine the impact of quality of audit committee, internal audit and external audit on financial reporting quality. Audit committee quality is measured using components of the members who have financial expertise, the number of meetings held, and the average of attendance of members in meetings. Internal audit quality is measured using the component of the auditing experience and auditor certification held by the chair of internal audit unit, also the numbers of internal audit member. External audit quality is measured using the component of audit tenure, auditor size, and audit fee. These three variables are tested for their impact on financial reporting quality using three dimensions of financial reporting quality which are dimension of relevance, representational faithfulness and neutrality. The results show that there are positive and significant impact between the quality of internal audit and external audit on financial reporting quality, but the impact of audit committee quality on financial reporting quality shows insignificant results. The results of joint effect test show there are positive and significant impact on the two way interaction between audit committee and the external audit and the three way interaction between audit committee, internal audit, and external audit on financial reporting quality.

Abstrak :
This research is aimed to examine the impact of audit committee quality measured by audit committee expertise, audit committee size, and number of meeting on the quality of company financial reporting with an audit quality as a moderating variable. This research uses three measures for financial reporting quality which are persistency, predictability, and conservatism. The results of this research show that audit committee quality affects financial reporting quality. Audit committee financial literacy significantly increase persistency and predictability of earnings. Size of audit committee positively affects earnings persistency and negatively affects earnings predictability and conservatism. Number of audit committee meeting also significantly increase persistency, predictability of earnings, and conservatism. We find a mixed evidence on the moderating role of audit quality in the the relationship between audit committee quality and financial reporting quality.

---

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh kualitas komite audit yang diukur dengan keahlian komite audit, ukuran komite audit, dan jumlah rapat terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan perusahaan dengan kualitas audit sebagai variabel moderasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga ukuran kualitas pelaporan keuangan yaitu persistensi, prediktabilitas, dan konservatisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kualitas komite audit berpengaruh terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan. Keahlian komite audit di bidang keuangan secara signifikan meningkatkan persistensi dan prediktabilitas dari laba. Ukuran komite audit secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap persistensi dan berpengaruh negatif terhadap prediktabilitas laba dan konservatisme. Jumlah rapat anggota komite audit juga secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap persistensi, prediktabilitas laba, dan konservatisme. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti yang berbaur atas efek moderasi dari kualitas audit terhadap hubungan antara kualitas komite audit dan kualitas pelaporan keuangan.

Abstrak :
The research aimed to discuss the determining factors and the economic consequences of financial reporting quality in Indonesian capital market. Those determining factors are innate, performance, company risk and industry risk. The financial reporting quality was measured on the following attributes: relevance, timeliness, and conservatism, whereas the economic consequence was measured on the asymmetric information. The research employed three steps of test: (1) test whether the attributes of financial reporting quality are different with each other; (2) analyze the determining factors of financial reporting quality; (3) test the effect of financiai reporting quality in the stock market, in terms of the relationship between asymmetric information and the financial reporting quality. The result of the first test showed that all of the attributes of financial reporting quality are different with each other. The analysis of determining factors showed that sales volatility, firm performance, and classification of the industry had a significant relationship with the attributes of financial reporting quality. The other variables, such as operation cycle, firm size, company risk, liquidity, and leverage, had no significant relationship with the attributes of financial reporting quality. The economic consequence test resulted that the attributes of financial reporting quality had a significant relationship with the asymmetric information