Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Salah satu perwujudan good governance, pemerintah dituntut untuk meningkatkan akuntabilitasnya. Dalam rangka meningkatkan akuntabilitasnya, pemerintah telah mengeluarkan beberapa peraturan dan perundang-undangan.Walaupun telah banyak peraturan dan perundang-undangan yang telah dibuat berkaitan dengan akuntabilitas, namun akuntabilitas pemerintah masih belum menunjukkan perbaikan yang signifikan.Oleh karena itulah penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan akuntabilitas keuangan dan kinerja, menganalisis keterkaitan antara akuntabilitas keuangan dan kinerja, dan memformulasikan model akuntabilitas berdasarkan metode balanced scorecard pada Direktorat Pembinaan SMK.Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kepustakaan berdasarkan dokumendokumen yang ada dan kemudian melakuan analisis berdasarkan teori dan peraturan serta perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Akuntabilitas Keuangan Direktorat Pembinaan SMK sudah sesuai dengan peraturan dan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Ini tercermin telah dibuatnya tiga macam laporan keuangan, yaitu Laporan Realisasi Anggaran, Neraca, dan Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan.Akuntabilitas Kinerja Direktorat Pembinaan SMK masih sangat lemah karena banyak sekali perbedaan antara dokumen perencanaan dan dokumen laporan kinerja. Sedangkan Akuntabilitas Keuangan dan Kinerja belum terkait satu sama lainnya. Hal ini disebabkan memang tidak terintergarsinya sistem keuangan dengan sistem akuntabilitas kinerja Pemerintah. Sistem keuangan mengacu pada Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (SAP), sedangkan akuntabilitas mengacu pada Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Perintah (SAKIP). Balanced Scorecard bisa menjadi alternatif dalam peningkatan akuntabilitas Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. Model Balanced Scorecard dibuat berdasarkan empat perspektif, yaitu Perspektif Publik, Perspektif Keuangan, Perspektif Proses Internal, serta Perspektif Pembelajaran dan Pertumbuhan.

---

One of the governance good principle, claimed governmental to increase its its[his]. In order to improving its[his] [him/ it], government have [released] some perundang-undangan. Walaupun and regulation have many legislation and regulation which have been made to relate to akuntabilitas, but governmental akuntabilitas still not yet shown repair which [is] signifikan.Because of that's this research aim to to know applying [of] monetary akuntabilitas and performance, analysing related/relevant [among/between] monetary akuntabilitas and performance, and memformulasikan model akuntabilitas pursuant to scorecard balanced method [at] Directorate Construction [of] SMK.Used [by] Method Research [is] bibliography method pursuant to existing document and later;then melakuan analyse pursuant to regulation and theory and also legislation going into effect Monetary Akuntabilitas [of] Directorate Construction [of] SMK have as according to legislation and regulation going into effect. This mirror have made of three kinds of financial statement, that is Report Realize Budget, Balance, and Note to the Financial Statement Akuntabilitas Performance Directorate Construction [of] SMK still very weak because a lot of difference [among/between] planning document and performance report document.While Monetary Akuntabilitas and Performance not yet related/relevant one another. This matter [is] caused (it) is true [do] not financial system terintergarsinya with Governmental performance akuntabilitas system. Financial system relate [at] Standard Accountancy Governance ( SAP), while akuntabilitas relate [at] System Akuntabilitas Performance Institution Comand ( SAKIP). Balanced Scorecard can become alternative in make-up of Directorate akuntabilitas Construction [of] SMK. Model Balanced Scorecard made pursuant to four is in perpective, that is is In Perpective [of] Public, In Perpective [of] Finance, In perpective [of] Internal Process, in perpective And also Study and Growth."

"ABSTRACTThis paper discusses current Indonesia local government accountability system which has undergone fundamental change since the reform era. Through a number of regulations, local governments now have to submit reports which include LPPD, LKPj, ILPPD, and LKPD. In line with what have been constructed by many experts, from normative perspective, those reports have the potential to facilitate a sound local government financial management and in turn, make them more accountable. Has current Indonesia local government accountability system been effectively implemented? Have these accountability mechanisms delivered their potential benefits as promised and constructed by many experts? In order to critically answer the questions, this study employs qualitative method with theory driven approach. The data is mainly obtained through conducting meta analysis through critically reviewing relevant sources or documents. Analysis goes from data reduction, to data organization and to interpretation. Research findings show that Indonesia existing local government accountability system has not been effectively implemented and brought all the potential benefits as calculated in both theoretical realm of accountability as well as constructed Indonesian government regulations. The findings of the study are particularly valuable in terms of filling the void on the analysis and information of current practice of local government accountability system in Indonesia reform era which have been marred by a number of problems, irregular and incomplete reporting, the absence of enforceability, limited capacity of local governments to produce appropriate reports, corruptive behavior of the auditors, and limited public participation."