Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Teknologi bisa memiliki dampak terhadap masyarakat setara dengan pengaruh undang-undang atau kebijakan pemerintah, karena itu keputusan teknis, menurut Andrew Feenberg, harus masuk dalam ranah demokrasi. Yang menjadi perintang demokratisasi teknologi adalah pandangan bahwa pengembangan teknologi sepenuhnya mengandalkan nalar tanpa pengaruh faktor-faktor sosial, sehingga teknologi dianggap mempengaruhi tetapi tidak dipengaruhi nilai dan budaya masyarakat. Kajian teknologi dan pemikiran konstruktivisme sosial membuktikan bahwa teknologi dan masyarakat memiliki hubungan saling mempengaruhi. Feenberg berusaha memadukan esensialisme teknologis dan konstruktivisme sosial dalam teori dua-tingkat. Namun, disertasi ini berargumen bahwa esensialisme teknologis tidak perlu dipertahankan karena peristiwa dekontekstualisasi yang mengambil obyek alam dari konteksnya untuk menjadi obyek teknis tetap mempengaruhi lingkungan manusia, dan dalam reduksionisme yang memangkas sifat-sifat yang tidak diperlukan suatu obyek teknis menghasilkan limbah yang bisa berbahaya bagi manusia. Sebagai gantinya penulis mengajukan teori yang menjelaskan perkembangan teknologi secara serentak dipengaruhi oleh susbistem teknologis, ekonomi dan sosial, yang masing-masing memiliki dualitas struktur-kepelakuan dan semua subsistem ini saling mempengaruhi yang menyebabkan spiral perubahan teknologi, ekonomi dan masyarakat.;

---

ABSTRACT
Technology may have a significant impact comparable to the impacts of regulations or policies of a government, therefore technical decision, according to Andrew Feenberg, should belong to the democratic sphere. The constraint to democratization of technology is the thought that technology is fully developed based on reason, without experiencing the influence of social factors. It implies that technology is influencing but not being influence by society. The field of technology studies and social constructivism prove that technology and society are constituting each other. Feenberg has reconciled technological essensialism and social constructivism in his two-level theory. But, the dissertaion argues that we should not keep technological essentialism because the moment of decontextualization, which takes object from its natural context, influences the environment, and the moment of reductionism, which strips technically useless qualities of technical object, disposes wastes that may be harmful to human beings. Therefore the dissertation suggest an alternative theory that explains that the development of technology is simultaneously influenced by technological, economic and social subsystems each of which has the duality of structure-agent and all subsystems are influencing each other which in turn cause the spiral of the development of technology, economy and society;Technology may have a significant impact comparable to the impacts of regulations or policies of a government, therefore technical decision, according to Andrew Feenberg, should belong to the democratic sphere. The constraint to democratization of technology is the thought that technology is fully developed based on reason, without experiencing the influence of social factors. It implies that technology is influencing but not being influence by society. The field of technology studies and social constructivism prove that technology and society are constituting each other. Feenberg has reconciled technological essensialism and social constructivism in his two-level theory. But, the dissertaion argues that we should not keep technological essentialism because the moment of decontextualization, which takes object from its natural context, influences the environment, and the moment of reductionism, which strips technically useless qualities of technical object, disposes wastes that may be harmful to human beings. Therefore the dissertation suggest an alternative theory that explains that the development of technology is simultaneously influenced by technological, economic and social subsystems each of which has the duality of structure-agent and all subsystems are influencing each other which in turn cause the spiral of the development of technology, economy and society, Technology may have a significant impact comparable to the impacts of regulations or policies of a government, therefore technical decision, according to Andrew Feenberg, should belong to the democratic sphere. The constraint to democratization of technology is the thought that technology is fully developed based on reason, without experiencing the influence of social factors. It implies that technology is influencing but not being influence by society. The field of technology studies and social constructivism prove that technology and society are constituting each other. Feenberg has reconciled technological essensialism and social constructivism in his two-level theory. But, the dissertaion argues that we should not keep technological essentialism because the moment of decontextualization, which takes object from its natural context, influences the environment, and the moment of reductionism, which strips technically useless qualities of technical object, disposes wastes that may be harmful to human beings. Therefore the dissertation suggest an alternative theory that explains that the development of technology is simultaneously influenced by technological, economic and social subsystems each of which has the duality of structure-agent and all subsystems are influencing each other which in turn cause the spiral of the development of technology, economy and society]

Abstrak :
Indonesia meraih skorIndeks Persepsi Korupsi40dari maksimal 100 dan berada pada urutan ke-85dari 180 negara yang disurveipada tahun 2019. Salah satu upaya meningkatkanskor indeks tersebutadalah dengan melakukan pencegahan korupsi, antara lain melaluiPendidikan Antikorupsi(PAK). Pendidikan Anti korupsi memiliki peranstrategis dalam pencegahan korupsi, sehingga perlu dilakukan upaya penguatannya. Artikel ini mengkajipenguatan Pendidikan Antikorupsidari perspektif esensialisme, yaitu peninjauan materi secara berkalaoleh semua pemangku kepentingan, penguatan konsep dan metodologi,perumusan hierarkhi nilai-nilai, penguatan sinergi catur pusat pendidikan, perumusan bidang keilmuan, dan reformasi budaya masyarakat. Kesimpulannya adalah KPK bersama stakeholder harus melakukan kajian materi Pendidikan Antikorupsi secara berkala; merekomendasikan keilmuannyakepada Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia sebagai implementasinyadi Perguruan Tinggi; dan setiap lembaga pendidikan memperkuat dengan Gerakan Literasi Antikorupsi dan/atau pembentukan ekstrakurikuler Komunitas Pelajar Antikorupsi

Abstrak :
Artikel ini mengulas persoalan ragam gender Bugis. Gender itu dinamis bukan statis, pemahaman gender Bugis sebagai representatif yang mumpuni untuk menggambarkan ragam gender yang plural, fleksibel, dan toleran. Gender Bugis yang dikaji, digunakan sebagai kritik terhadap esensialisme gender yang tidak dapat membahasakan diskursus ragam gender Bugis. Artikel ini menggunakan data yang diambil dari teks-teks dan dokumenter yang membahas gender Bugis. Metode feminis dan analisis kritis secara dekonstruksi terhadap esensialisme gender, dan teori performativitas gender Butler sebagai cara untuk membedah pemahaman gender Bugis. Dari proses rekognisi menghasilkan pandangan baru dalam proses menciptakan dan membangun identitas gender melalui bentuk performativitas gender. Tubuh bukan sebagai ekspresi melainkan menjadi konfigurasi pelengkap atas perempuan dan laki-laki. Gender tidak dipandang permanen, tetapi secara ilusi. Performativitas berguna dalam menangani gender di Bugis karena menunjukkan bagaimana norma dominan membentuk gender. Selain itu, performativitas gender sebagai upaya untuk mengembangkan identitas gender melalui upaya pengenalan dan pelestarian ragam gender serta nilai Bugis lewat berbagai media. ......This article examines the issue of Bugis gender diversity. Gender is dynamic, not static, the understanding of Bugis gender as a capable representative to describe a plural, flexible, and tolerant gender diversity. The Bugis gender study is used to critique gender essentialism which cannot discuss the Bugis gender diversity discourse. This article uses data taken from texts and documentaries that discuss Bugis's gender. Feminist methods and deconstructive critical analysis of gender essentialism, and Butler's theory of gender performativity as a way to dissect Bugis gender understanding. The recognition process produces new views in creating and building gender identity through the form of gender performativity. The body is not an expression but a complementary configuration of women and men. Gender is not seen as permanent but illusory. Performativity helps deal with gender in Bugis because it shows how dominant norms shape gender. In addition, gender performativity is an effort to develop gender identity through efforts to identify and preserve gender diversity and Bugis values ​​through various media.

Abstrak :
Place has certain connotations that are involved in shaping the identity of an individual or a community. Due to the importance of place or location in identity formation, Cultural Studies has its own area of analysis focusing on the understanding of place, which is cultural geography. Peter Jackson (1989: 23, quoted by Giles and Middleton 1999: 104) defines cultural geography as a study on how cultures are constituted by social practises occurring in certain contexts which are influenced by historical and geographical factors. The discussion of artistic works centred on the role of place in identity formation becomes an interesting analysis. This research focuses on Rudi Soejarwo?s film Mendadak Dangdut ('Suddenly Dangdut'). The film?s setting is a densely populated district in Jakarta. As the plot centres around this setting, an analysis of how place influences the identity formation of the film?s main character becomes significant. The research is made using approaches in cultural geography, along with two key concepts in Cultural Studies, which are identity and representation. It is aimed at finding a new consciousness as to how urban context, especially that related to an understanding of place, takes part in the formation of identity of individuals and communities.