Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This rigorous comparative study of national identity in Japan, South Korea, and China examines countries with long histories influenced by Confucian thought, surging nationalism, and far-reaching ambitions for regional importance.Contents1. Japanese national identity : a six-dimensional analysis /​ Gilbert Rozman2. South Korean national identity : a six-dimensional analysis /​ Gilbert Rozman3. Chinese national identity : a six-dimensional analysis /​ Gilbert Rozman4. The East Asian national identity syndrome /​ Gilbert Rozman5. Japanese national identity : evolution and prospects /​ Kazuhiko Togo6. Japan's national identity in postwar diplomacy : the three basic principles /​ Uuichi Hosoya7. Korean national identity : evolutionary stages and diplomatic challenges /​ Gilbert Rozman and Andrew Kim8. Unraveling national identity in South Korea : Minjok and Gukmin /​ Chung-in Moon9. China's national identity and foreign policy : continuity amid transformation /​ Jin Linbo10. China's national identity in diplomacy : noninterference in internal affairs /​ Ming Wan.Notes"

""As postcolonial nations, the boundaries of countries in island Southeast Asia were determined and delineated by the respective colonial administrations prior to political independence. Consequently, the territorial boundaries approximately correspond with the territorial limits under colonial tutelage. Within these territories are to be found indigenous colonized population and resident immigrant populations encouraged by the economic opportunities provided by colonization. As postcolonial nations, these countries are unavoidably 'multiracial' or 'multiethnic', and thus 'multicultural', by their colonial legacies. Each of these countries has transformed this demographic and geographic reality into part of the national ideology and political practice, in respective ways that are historically over determined. This paper will attempt to place these three cases within a larger theoretical framework of multiculturalism and call for political adjustments in the three polities.""

"Sejak dibentuk pada 1996, forum Asia-Europe meeting (ASEM) telah sukses menjembatani hubungan antara negara-negara anggota Uni Eropa dengan Asia Timur. Kendati demikian, tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa peran ASEM tidak sekadar sebagai forum dialog antarkawasan. Forum ini secara potensial menbawa dampak-dampak yang positif bagi negara-negara partisipan dari Asia Timur (East Asian Community). Sebenarnya suda ada smbidi yang luar biasa di Asia Timur untuk membentuk kelompok masyarakat tersebut. Namun belum ada suatu rancangan yang kuat untuk membangunnya oleh karena masih adanya perbedaan di antara negara-negara di kawasan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, ASEM dapat membawa dukungan yang berarti dalam mmerumuskan pembentukan East Asian Community melalui tiga pendekatan. Yaitu menginfestasikan dialog antar kawasan antara Uni Eropa dan Asia Timur dalam proses ASEM, mendukung kemitraan Uni Eropa -ASEAN dan ASEAn+3 dan melibatkan partisipasi aktor-aktor non-negara."