Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Indonesia merupakan Negara hukum yang menganut paham demokrasi dan menerapkan sistem pemerintahan berdasarkan kedaulatan rakyat atau yang lazim disebut system pemerintahan demokrasi. Implikasi dari asas demokrasi dan kedaulatan rakyat itu adalah dilaksanakannya Pemilu. Pada tahun 2004, Pemilu Presiden dilakukan dengan mekanisme pemilihan langsung. Hal ini ternyata membawa pengaruh terhadap pelaksanaan Pilkada hingga akhirnya DPR membuat seperangkat aturan yang digunakan sebagai alat untuk melakukan Pilkada secara langsung yaitu Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 6 Tahun 2005 tentang Pilkada. Dalam peraturan ini, Pilkada masuk dalam rezim pemerintah otonomi daerah, sehingga penyelesaian sengketa Pilkada berada pada kewenangan Mahkamah Agung, bukan Mahkamah Konstitusi seperti dalam Pemilu Legislatif dan Pemilu Presiden. Pada perjalanannya, penyelesaian sengketa pilkada di Mahkamah Agung banyak justru menambah permasalahan semakin kompleks, baik dari segi jangka waktu penyelesaian yang berlarut-larut, materi putusan yang banyak menimbulkan kontroversi dan bahkan ketidakpercayaan masyarakat terhadap kemampuan Mahkamah Agung untuk dapat menyelesaikan sengketa pilkada dengan cara mempraktikkan sistem peradilan yang bersih, cepat, dan murah. Banyaknya masalah penyelesaian sengketa pilkada di Mahkamah Agung menimbulkan keinginan untuk memasukkan pilkada sebagai rezim Pemilu sehingga konsekuensinya adalah penyelesaian sengketa pilkada diselesaikan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pada akhirnya pembuat undang-undang memasukkan pilkada dalam rezim Pemilu dengan melakukan Perubahan Kedua Undang- Undang No. 32 Tahun 2004 dengan membentuk Undang-Undang No. 12 tahun 2008 yang dalam pasal 236C menyatakan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa Pilkada diselesaikan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini mencoba menjawab permasalahan-permasalahan yaitu apakah peralihan kewenangan penyelesaian sengketa Pilkada dari Mahkamah Agung ke Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan hal yang konstitusional dan apakah peralihan kewenangan tersebut dapat menjamin kepastian hukum dalam pelaksanaan demokrasi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan tipe penelitian hukum normatif sehingga dalam menjawab permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep, dan pendekatan perbandingan.

---

Indonesia is a country that adopted the law understand and apply democratic system of government based on sovereignity of the people or the prevalent system of government called democracy. Implications of the principle of democracy and the sovereignty of the people is the implementation of elections. In 2004, the Presidential Election is done with the direct election mechanism. This appeared to bring the influence of the implementation of the elections eventually the House of Representatives to create a set of rules that is used as a tool for direct election of regional to the Act No. 32 of 2004 on Local Government and the Government Regulation No. 6 of 2005 on Direct Election of Regional. In this rule, the elections included in the regional autonomy regime, so that disputes are on the election authority the Supreme Court, not the Constitutional Court as in the legislative election and the Election of the President. On the journey, direct elections of regional settlement of disputes in the Supreme Court would add a lot more complex problems, both in terms of the settlement period of sustained, the decision that a lot of controversy and even distrust of the ability of people to the Supreme Court can resolve disputes in a way direct election of regional practice system the clean, fast, and cheap. The many problems the settlement of disputes in the Supreme Court direct elections of regional desirable to enter Election regime as a consequence so is the settlement of disputes pilkada completed in the Constitutional Court. In the end, legislator enter direct election of regional regime in elections by making changes Second Act No. 32 of 2004 established the Act No. 12 of 2008 which states in Article 236C that election disputes are resolved in the Constitutional Court. This research is an attempt to answer the problems, namely whether the transition of authority from the election of regional dispute by Supreme Court to Constitutional Court is a constitutional authority and whether the transition can guarantee legal certainty in the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. This type of research is the study of law so that in a normative problems by using the method of approach to legislation, the concept of the approach, and comparative approach.

Abstrak :
The dynamics of local politics has entered a new phase in Indonesia since 2004,people at localities and provinces has exercised their rights in electing their leaders,i.e.governor/vice governor,mayor/vice mayor ,or regent/vice regent.....

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
The local head election in Indonesia suffers from vote buying. However, there is a lack of study compared to vote buying case in Indonesia, especially quantitative study. Therefore, this study aims to fill the gap. The purpose is to estimate the effect of individual and community characteristics on the probability of voter to consider money or gifts in a local head election. This study uses the data from Indonesia Family Life Survey 5 (IFLS5) conducted in 2014/2015 for 29,788 respondents. As the response is a binary data, the Linear Probability Model (LPM) and logit model is utilized. The result shows that both individual and community characteristics affect vote buying in Indonesia. Voters with tertiary education are far less likely to consider money or gift by 29.1% than others. By using logit test, the coefficient is corrected. Voters with a university degree tend to not engage in vote buying by 0.27 times than the others. This study finds other interesting findings that gender matter in vote buying in Indonesia. Female voters tend to consider money or gift more than male by 2.44%. Voters who live in rural areas have a higher probability to consider vote buying by 4.55%. Living in the internet-connected community may reduce the probability of vote buying. The coefficient indicates that those with internet access have less probability to consider money or gift in an election by 1.35%. Living in a community with high social awareness makes voters less vulnerable to vote buying. The coefficient indicates that they have less possibility to consider money by 2.44% than those living in communities with less social awareness. Thus, the strategy to eliminate vote buying should be adjusted to the character of voters in a certain community.

Abstrak :
Direct election of District Head and Vice District Head has been out for the first time in Indonesia, including in Sleman District. One of the prominent aspects of this system of this system is participation of the society. For that purpose understanding on society perception in the execution of that the democratic party is needed, considering that such an understanding can also determine the use of the right to choose. One of the subdistricts in Sleman District which played roles in that election is the Sleman Subdistrict, that is why it was chosen as location of this research, considering that is population and heterogenity is big enough...

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Model pemilihan kepala daerah pada Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) yang sampai dengan saat ini dijalankan adalah dipilih melalui mekanisme penetapan. Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono dan Sri Paku Alam sebagai Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Provinsi DIY dipilih melalui mekanisme penetapan. Dengan terjadinya perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 terutama Pasal 18 dan pengaturan pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung yang terdapat pada pasal 56 ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 membawa implikasi hukum terhadap perubahan mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Provinsi DIY dari sistem penetapan kepada sistem pemilihan secara langsung oleh rakyat. Sejalan dengan perubahan tersebut, sebagai bentuk penyeragaman (uniformitas) tata pemerintahan diseluruh Indonesia, maka Pemerintah Provinsi DIY yang memiliki ciri keistimewaan diharapakan dapat memiliki undang-undang tersendiri yang dapat mengakomodasi kebutuhan Pemerintahan Provinsi DIY khususnya pengaturan mengenai mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur DIY. Dalam hal ini adalah pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung. Penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder. Adapun kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan Kepala Daerah Provinsi DIY yang sejalan dengan Pasal 18 UUD 1945, UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, dan UU Nomor 3 Tahun 1950 junto UU Nomor 19 Tahun 1955 tentang Pembentukan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta adalah dapat dilakukan Pertama, melalui mekanisme pemilihan secara langsung bagi Jabatan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Provinsi DIY, dan Kedua melalui mekanisme penetapan bagi dan terbatas pada Sultan Hamengku Buwono dan Sri Paku Alam sebagai Gubernur Utama dan Wakil Gubernur Utama. ......The thesis reveals successive mechanism on governor and vice governor post in the special region of Yogyakarta governor which currently adopt appointed system. The system has appointed His Majesty the King of Mataram or Yogyakarta emperor Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono and Sri Paku Alam as governor and deputy respectively. By the amendement of Indonesian constitutional UUD 1945 especially chapter 18 and Law number 32 year 2004 on chapter 56 verse number (1) concernig the application of direct election toward provincial and district executive has contributed impact enormously on the executive post successive mechanism for Yogyakarta province as the special administration in which appointed system applied and accepted rather than the general elected application. In response to this amendement and uniformity implication to the administrative system of Indonesian law, consequntly Yogyakarta administration who holds special privilege is supposed to stipulate certain conditions in accomodating the administration of Yogyakarta in a way of successive arrangement and its mechanism for the provincial executive post direct election case in point the governor and his deputy. The thesis conducted direct research from source of reference in the library as a secondary source of reference. The conclution derived from the observation discovered the compliance of the executive succession for Yogyakarta province governor and its deputy post with Indonesian constitutional UUD 45 chapter 18, Law number 32 year 2004 on provincial dan residencial administration and Law number 3 year 1950 on special administration of Yogyakarta. The succession should be conducted by: the 1st, through direct election for governor and deputy post of Yogyakarta administration and the 2nd through limited appointment His Majesty Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono and Sri Paku Alam as the governor and its Deputy.