Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Pembangunan rumah susun di perkotaan faktanya memunculkan persoalan-persoalan serius. Berbagai regulasi mengatur pengawasan pembangunan dan penyelesaian transaksi rumah susun, belum menjangkau tujuan ideal suatu pembangunan. Disintegrasi regulasi rumah susun, menunjukkan penyelenggaraan urusan perumahan sebagai salah satu kebutuhan dasar manusia, belum komprehensif dilaksanakan. Permasalahan jual beli rumah susun lebih banyak merugikan pihak konsumen. Berdasarkan fakta tersebut, relevan untuk menganalisa kesesuaian jangkauan prinsip keseimbangan dengan dimensi kontekstual dinamika terkini masyarakat modern dan dimensi normatif peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan perbandingan hukum digunakan menganalisa (1) Prinsip keseimbangan dalam suatu perjanjian pengikatan jual beli di Indonesia; (2) Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun (PPJB Sarusun); (3) Rekonstruksi Prinsip Keseimbangan antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun sebagai pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun. Hasil penelitian adalah asas Keseimbangan dalam perjanjian pengikatan jual beli di Indonesia berlaku mulai dari proses pembuatan kontrak sampai pelaksanaan kontrak. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk menjamin proses negosiasi yang adil/setara, terjamin distribusi pertukaran hak dan kewajiban sesuai proporsinya. Prinsip keseimbangan menunjukkan adanya kebutuhan kesetaraan sebagai syarat utama terciptanya perjanjian. Selanjutnya, peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada belum dapat memenuhi prinsip keseimbangan kepentingan bagi para pihak dalam suatu perjanjian pengikatan jual beli satuan rumah susun, meskipun UU No. 8/1999 dan UU No. 20/2011 beserta peraturan turunannya telah berupaya mencapainya. PPJB Sarusun tetap dilaksanakan meskipun syarat 20% keterbangunan belum terpenuhi sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat (2) UURS, Kepmenpera No.11/1994 yang mengatur pedoman PPJB. Terdapat ketidakseimbangan kedudukan antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun, sehingga penerapan prinsip kesetaraan para pihak berdasarkan asas keseimbangan pada PPJB rumah susun tidak terwujud, pelaku usaha lebih superior dari konsumennya. Terbukti dari hasil penelitian terhadap 18 PPJB Sarusun baik yang komersial maupun umum. Bentuk pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun adalah dengan melakukan rekonstruksi prinsip keseimbangan dalam PPJB Sarusun. Asas keseimbangan yang menjadi sintesa antara asas kebebasan, asas konsensus dan asas kekuatan mengikat, hakikatnya hanya dapat terpenuhi melalui ketiga prinsip tersebut berdasarkan hirarki leksikal. Pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun berdasarkan Kepmenpera No. 11 Tahun 1994 dengan penyesuaian 11 gagasan materi dalam perubahan UURS yang sejalan dengan asas keseimbangan agar pembagian hak dan kewajiban dapat terwujud di seluruh tahapan hubungan kontraktual.

---

The construction of flats in urban areas in fact raises serious problems. Various regulations governing the supervision of the construction and settlement of flats, have not yet reached the ideal goal of development. Disintegration of flats regulations, showing the implementation of housing affairs as one of the basic human needs, has not been comprehensively implemented. The problem of buying and selling flats is more detrimental to the consumer. Based on these facts, its relevant to analyze the suitability of the balance principle with the contextual dimensions of the current dynamics of modern society and the normative dimensions of legislation in Indonesia. Normative legal research methods and legal comparisons are used in this dissertation, by analyzing (1) The Balance Principle in the Conditional Sale and Puchase Agreement in Indonesia; (2) Implementation of Legal Protection in the Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement of Flats (CSPA Flats); (3) Reconstruction of the Balance Principle between business actors and consumers of flats as a legal renewal of the CSPA of Flats. The results of the study show that the balance principle in the CSPA of Flats in Indonesia is valid from the process of making the contract to the implementation of the contract. This is intended to guarantee a fair/ equal negotiation process, guaranteed distribution of the exchange of rights and obligations in proportion. The balance principle shows the need for balance and equality of position as the main conditions for the creation of agreements. Furthermore, the existing laws and regulations have not been able to fulfill the balance principle of parties interests in the CSPA of Flats, even though Law No. 8/1999 and Law No. 20/2011 along with derivative regulations have attempted to achieve it. CSPA of Flats is still implemented even though the condition of 20 persen development has not been fulfilled as stipulated in Article 43 paragraph (2) UURS, Kepmenpera No.11/ 1994 which regulates CSPA guidelines. There is an imbalance between the position of business actors and consumers of flats, so that the application of the principle of equality of parties based on the principle of balance in the CSPA of Flats does not materialize, business actors are superior to consumers. Evident from the results of research on 18 CSPA of Flats, both commercial and public. The form of legal reform of the CSPA of Flats between business actors and consumers of flats is to carry out a balance principles reconstruction in the CSPA of Flats. The balance principle becomes a synthesis between the principle of freedom, the principle of consensus and the principle of binding power, its essence can only be fulfilled through the three principles based on the lexical hierarchy. Legal renewal of the CSPA of Flats based on Kepmenpera No. 11/1994 by adjusting eleven content material ideas in the amendment to the Law on Flats that is in line with the principle of balance so that the distribution of rights and obligations can be realized at all stages of contractual relations

Abstrak :
[Penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti mengenai jual beli tanah dan bangunan yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan serta kedudukan dan kekuatan mengikat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas (PPJB Lunas) dan Kuasa Jual dalam hal pengalihan hak milik atas tanah (beserta bangunan apabila diperjanjikan). Dalam skripsi ini, dianalisis satu kasus dengan empat putusan dari Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama sampai dengan Tingkat Peninjauan Kembali. Dari analisis tersebut, dapat diketahui bahwa ada dua pendapat hakim yang saling bertentangan. Pendapat pertama adalah dengan PPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual maka telah terjadinya peralihan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan sedangkan pendapat kedua adalah dengan PPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual belum terjadi peralihan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan. Sebagai hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kedudukan dan kekuatan mengikat PPPJB Lunas dan Kuasa Jual telah mengalihkan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan apabila dalam kenyataannya sudah terjadi perbuatan hukum dimana pembeli telah melakukan pembayaran dan telah menerima penyerahan serta menguasai tanah dan bangunan tersebut, sedangkan penjual telah menyerahkan Kuasa Jual dan tanah serta bangunan itu sendiri kepada pembeli dan penjual telah menerima pembayaran sehingga perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur terang, tunai dan riil sebagaimana dasar hukum jual beli tanah yang berlaku pada saat ini, serta memenuhi syarat materiil jual beli. ......This thesis was written using literary research method with secondary data as its source of data. This thesis aims to examine the mechanisms sale and purchase of land and building which is regulated in accordance with the laws and regulations and the legal standing and binding of Land and Building Conditional Sale Purchase Agreement in Full Settlement (CSPA in Full Settlement) and Power of Attorney to Sell, in connection with the transfer of right of ownership over the land (and building if agreed). This thesis will primarily analyze one legal case which went to produce four court decisions, leveling from the Court of First Instance until the Supreme Court. From this analysis, it is discovered that there are two judge’s opinion, which contradicts one to another. The first opinion is that, the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building, while the second opinion is that the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have not transferred the right of ownership over land and building yet. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the legal standing and binding of CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building when the facts of the case show that it had happened a juridical action in which the buyer has made payment and has conducted the acceptance, and possessed the land and buildings, while the seller has granted the Power of Attorney to Sell and delivered the land and building to the buyer and received the payment for it. Such action would therefore qualified for a sale and purchase that is “terang”, “tunai” and “riil”, which is the basic of legality of the sale and purchase of the land under the prevailing laws, as well as the fulfilling the material requirement of sales and purchase. , This thesis was written using literary research method with secondary data as its source of data. This thesis aims to examine the mechanisms sale and purchase of land and building which is regulated in accordance with the laws and regulations and the legal standing and binding of Land and Building Conditional Sale Purchase Agreement in Full Settlement (CSPA in Full Settlement) and Power of Attorney to Sell, in connection with the transfer of right of ownership over the land (and building if agreed). This thesis will primarily analyze one legal case which went to produce four court decisions, leveling from the Court of First Instance until the Supreme Court. From this analysis, it is discovered that there are two judge’s opinion, which contradicts one to another. The first opinion is that, the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building, while the second opinion is that the CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have not transferred the right of ownership over land and building yet. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the legal standing and binding of CSPA in Full Settlement and Power of Attorney to Sell have transferred the right of ownership over land and building when the facts of the case show that it had happened a juridical action in which the buyer has made payment and has conducted the acceptance, and possessed the land and buildings, while the seller has granted the Power of Attorney to Sell and delivered the land and building to the buyer and received the payment for it. Such action would therefore qualified for a sale and purchase that is “terang”, “tunai” and “riil”, which is the basic of legality of the sale and purchase of the land under the prevailing laws, as well as the fulfilling the material requirement of sales and purchase. ]