Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book offers a comprehensive linguistic analysis of contemporary US television series. Adopting an interdisciplinary and multimethodological approach, Monika Bednarek brings together linguistic analysis of the Sydney Corpus of Television Dialogue with analysis of scriptwriting manuals, interviews with Hollywood scriptwriters, and a survey undertaken with university students about their consumption of TV series. In so doing, she presents five new and original empirical studies. The focus on language use in a professional context (the television industry), on scriptwriting pedagogy, and on learning and teaching provides an applied linguistic lens on TV series. This is complemented by perspectives taken from media linguistics, corpus linguistics and sociocultural linguistics/sociolinguistics. Throughout the book, multiple dialogue extracts are presented from a wide variety of well-known fictional television series, including The Big Bang Theory, Grey's Anatomy and Bones. Researchers in applied linguistics, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics and media linguistics will find the book both stimulating and unique in its approach."

"Para pemimpin Negara-negara ASEAN dan 6 negara mitra FTA ASEAN (Australia, Cina, India, Japan, Korea dan Selandia Baru) meluncurkan negosisasi Regional Economic Comprehensive Partnership (RCEP) pada Akhir November 2012 dengan tujuan untuk mencapai kesepakatan kemitraan ekonomi yang modern, komprehensif, bermutu tinggi, dan saling menguntungkan antara Negara-negara Anggota ASEAN dan mitra FTA ASEAN. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis daya saing dan prediksi dampak keikutsertaan Indonesia dalam RCEP. Dengan menggunakan analisis Revelead Comparative Advantage (RCA), penelitian ini fokus menganalisis daya saing produk ekspor di antara anggota RCEP termasuk Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan daya saing produk Indonesia masih termasuk lemah dibandingkan dengan sebagian besar Negara-negara anggota RCEP lainnya. Di sisi makro, hasil simulasi menggunakan aplikasi Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)  dengan agregasi 17 negara/ regional dan 43 produk menunjukkan  bahwa dengan diberlakukannya kesepakatan RCEP, diperkirakan akan meningkatkan kinerja perdagangan, GDP dan kesejahtaraan sebagian besar Negara-negara anggota RCEP termasuk Indonesia.

---

The leaders of ASEAN countries and the six partner countries of the ASEAN FTA (Australia, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea and New Zealand) launched the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations in November 2012 with the aim of reaching a modern, comprehensive, high-quality, beneficial among ASEAN Member States and ASEAN FTA partners. This study aims to analyze the competitiveness and impact prediction of Indonesia's participation in the RCEP. Using Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) analysis, this study focused on analyzing of competitiveness of the export products among RCEP members including Indonesia. The results of this study show that the competitiveness of Indonesian products is still weak compared to most other RCEP member countries. Therefore, the Government of Indonesia should enhance the competitiveness of products in order to compete and take advantage of its participation in the RCEP. Furthermore, impact prediction analysis uses Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) application, with 17 countries/regional and 43 products aggregations. The simulation results show that with the enforcement of the RCEP agreement, it is predicted to increase trade performance, GDP and the welfare of most Member States including Indonesia."

"ABSTRAK Latar belakang. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICF dipublikasi oleh World Health Organization untuk menstandardisasi deskripsi kesehatan dan disabilitas. Comprehensive core set ICF for spinal cord injury SCI in long-term context merupakan perangkat komprehensif yang mewakili sejumlah kategori terpilih dari seluruh klasifikasi dan dapat digunakan bersama dengan penentu kualifikasi ICF untuk mendeskripsikan fungsi dan disabilitas penderita setelah mengalami cedera medula spinalis CMS . Penggunaan penentu kualifikasi ICF menimbulkan pertanyaan perihal reliabilitas interrater.Tujuan. Menilai reliabilitas interrater comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long-term context dalam praktik rehabilitasi.Metode. Uji reliabilitas merupakan studi observasional yang dilakukan secara potong lintang. Subjek adalah 30 penderita CMS dengan paraplegia kronik yang bertempat tinggal di Wisma Pondok Bambu dan Yayasan Wisma Cheshire. Rater penilai ialah 1 orang SpKFR serta 2 orang PPDS IKFR. Uji reliabilitas menilai 110 kategori ICF, terdiri dari 23 kategori dari komponen fungsi tubuh, 63 kategori dari komponen aktivitas dan partisipasi, serta 24 kategori dari komponen faktor lingkungan. Semua data berbasis ICF diperoleh dari pemeriksaan fisik dan wawancara subjek menggunakan comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long-term context. Semua wawancara dilakukan secara individual oleh 1 orang PPDS IKFR yang sama, yang telah mengikuti pelatihan prinsip ICF. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dalam ruangan yang tenang dan berlangsung sekitar 2 jam. Reliabilitas dan properti setiap kategori dianalisis secara statistik menggunakan agreement dan weighted kappa. Agreement >60 dan weighted kappa >0,6 menunjukkan reliabilitas baik. Kualifikasi 8 yang berarti tidak spesifik dan 9 yang berarti tidak dapat diterapkan, dianggap missing data.Hasil. Median durasi wawancara berbasis comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long-term context adalah 31,9 rentang 20,7-62,4 menit. Persentase agreement antar penilai bervariasi antara 0-100 . Weighted kappa bervariasi antara -0,064-1,000. Keseluruhan kategori, 20 kategori dari komponen fungsi tubuh, 59 kategori dari komponen aktivitas dan partisipasi, serta 14 kategori dari faktor lingkungan, memiliki agreement yang baik, yaitu 86,4 , 87,0 , 93,7 , serta 58,3 . Beberapa kategori ICF memiliki reliabilitas yang buruk dan tidak dapat dinilai.Simpulan. Seluruh komponen ICF menunjukkan reliabilitas interrater yang baik dan bervariasi antar kategori dan antar penilai. Penelitian ini menandakan reliabilitas interrater comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long-term context dapat diterima. Disarankan untuk mengembangkan panduan penilaian yang lebih rinci dan sederhana untuk mengurangi perbedaan antar penilai. Penentu kualifikasi mungkin lebih mudah bila jumlah kualifikasi dikurangi, khususnya pada komponen faktor lingkungan.

---

ABSTRACTBackground. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICF was published by the World Health Organization to standardize descriptions of health and disability. The comprehensive core set ICF for spinal cord injury SCI in long term context is a comprehensive tool that represents a selection of categories from the whole classification and can be used along with the ICF qualifier scale to describe patients rsquo functioning and disability following SCI. The application of the ICF qualifier scale poses the question of interrater reliability.Objective. To study the interrater reliability of the comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long term context in rehabilitation practice.Methods. A cross sectional reliability study was conducted. A consecutive sample of 30 SCI patients with chronic paraplegia from Wisma Pondok Bambu and Yayasan Wisma Cheshire participated. One physiatrist and two Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation PM R residents rated the subject rsquo s functioning in 110 ICF categories, consists of 23 categories of the component ldquo body functions rdquo , 63 categories of the component ldquo activity and participation rdquo , and 24 categories of the component ldquo environmental factors rdquo . All ICF data were collected via physical examination and patient interview using the comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long term context. All interviews were performed independently by the same PM R resident, trained in principles of ICF. Data collection was carried out in quiet room and lasted approximately 2 hour. Reliability and the properties of each category were estimated using the observed agreement and weighted kappa statistic. An observed agreement 60 and weighted kappa 0.6 showed good reliability. The response options 8 lsquo not specified rsquo and 9 lsquo not applicable rsquo were considered missing data.Results. Median time for interviews with the comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long term context was 31.9 range 20.7 62.4 minutes. The percentage of the observed agreement between the raters ranged from 0 to 100 . The weighted kappa ranged from 0.064 to 1.000. Overall categories, 20 categories of the component ldquo body functions rdquo , 59 categories of the component ldquo activity and participation rdquo , and 14 categories of the component ldquo environmental factors rdquo showed observed good agreement 86.4 , 87.0 , 93.7 , and 58.3 , respectively . Some categories in the ICF were rated as unreliable and immeasurable.Conclusion. The overall ICF components demonstrated good interrater reliability and varied considerably across categories and between raters. This study indicated that the interrater reliability of the comprehensive core set ICF for SCI in long term context was acceptable. It is recommended to establish detailed and simpler measuring guidelines to reduce the differences between raters. The metric of the qualifiers rsquo scale may be improved by reducing the number of qualifiers especially for ldquo environmental factors rdquo component."

"Written by one of the preeminent researchers in the field, this book provides a comprehensive exposition of modern analysis of causation. It shows how causality has grown from a nebulous concept into a mathematical theory with significant applications in the fields of statistics, artificial intelligence, economics, philosophy, cognitive science, and the health and social sciences. Judea Pearl presents and unifies the probabilistic, manipulative, counterfactual, and structural approaches to causation and devises simple mathematical tools for studying the relationships between causal connections and statistical associations. Cited in more than 2,100 scientific publications, it continues to liberate scientists from the traditional molds of statistical thinking. In this revised edition, Judea Pearl elucidates thorny issues, answers readers' questions, and offers a panoramic view of recent advances in this field of research. Causality will be of interest to students and professionals in a wide variety of fields. Dr Judea Pearl has received the 2011 Rumelhart Prize for his leading research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and systems from The Cognitive Science Society."

"Salah satu peran paling penting pemimpin perusahaan adalah menghasilkan keputusan stratejik yang efektif. Keputusan stratejik yang dihasilkan akan menentukan tingkat daya saing perusahaan di dalam industri. Telah diketahui secara luas bahwa kepercayaan dan kolaborasi antar Top Management Team (TMT) memberikan dampak penting terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan stratejik. Selain itu juga diketahui bahwa proses pengambilan keputusan secara rasional komprehensif akan menentukan efektivitas keputusan yang dibuat oleh TMT.Tujuan dari riset ini adalah mempelajari bagaimana hubungan kepercayaan dan kolaborasi antar anggota TMT terhadap seberapa komprehensif proses pengambilan keputusan yang mereka lakukan. Studi empiris telah dilakukan dengan mengembangkan model penelitian bagaimana proses pengambilan keputusan stratejik dilakukan di perusahaan tambang di Indonesia. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan Structural Equation Model (SEM) untuk menganalisa 267 responden yang mewakili perusahaan tambang, baik perusahaan tambang Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) maupun perusahaan tambang swasta.Penelitian menemukan bahwa TMT Collaboration menjadi mediator dari TMT Trust terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan yang rasional komprehensif. Untuk membuat proses pengambilan keputusan yang efektif, TMT harus memiliki kepercayaan dan kolaborasi yang tinggi antar mereka. Selain itu, proses pengambilan keputusan harus dilakukan secara komprehensif baik prosesnya maupun pembahasan isi keputusan yang akan dibuat.

Studi ini memberikan kontribusi kepada dunia akademis khususnya di bidang pembuatan keputusan stratejik. Temuan penelitian tentang hubungan TMT Trust dan TMT Collaboration terhadap pengambilan keputusan secara komprehensif baik proses dan pembahasan isi (Content) akan memperkaya literatur bagaimana meningkatkan kinerja organisasi dengan melakukan proses pengambilan keputusan yang optimal dan efektif. Kontribusi manajerial dihasilkan dari model proses pengambilan keputusan stratejik yang optimal yang dapat diterapkan di perusahaan untuk meningkatkan kinerja organisasi.

---

One of the most important roles of top management in the organization is how effective the strategic decision they make. The strategic decision will determine the competitiveness of the company in the industry. It is widely known that trust and collaboration of Top Management Team (TMT) generates positive impacts in the strategic decision making process. It is also known that rational process determines the effectiveness of decision that been made by TMT.

The aim of this research is to study the relations between TMT’s trust and collaboration toward rational comprehensive on strategic decision making process. An empirical study has been undertaken to develop a model on how to make the effective strategic decision making process for mining companies. This study utilizes Structural Equation Model (SEM) Lisrel methodology to analyze 267(two-hundred and sixty-seven) respondents representing mining companies in Indonesia.

This study has found that TMT collaboration being a mediator of TMT trust to rational strategic decision making. To develop an effective strategic decision making process, TMT must possess a high trust and collaboration, as well as a high process and content comprehensiveness.

This study contributes to existing literature on strategic management, especially the strategic decision making. The finding generated from TMT trust and collaboration relation to comprehensiveness process and content will certainly enrich the literature on how to improve organizational performance by means of conducting optimal and effective strategic decision making process. The insight produced from this study will provide managerial advise by proposing an optimal model of strategic decision making process that could boost company performance."

"Sebagai negara dengan perekonomian yang berada di ranking keenam belas di dunia pada tahun 2018, kerjasama perdagangan internasional merupakan hal penting bagi Indonesia. Kerjasama perdagangan internasional pada awalnya hanya difokuskan pada negara-negara yang menjadi mitra dagang utama saja, baik dalam skala global maupun regional seperti ASEAN. Pada perkembangannya, Indonesia juga membuka diri dengan menjalin kerjasama perdagangan bebas atau Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) dengan negara lain di luar kawasan yaitu Chile yang terletak di kawasan Amerika Latin. Akan tetapi jika ditinjau dari perdagangan internasional, nilai perdagangan antara Indonesia dan Chile tidak signifikan dibanding dengan negara lainnya yang berada di kawasan tersebut seperti Brazil dan Argentina. Hal ini menimbulkan pertanyaan, mengapa Indonesia justru menjalin kerjasama perdagangan bebas dengan Chile dalam skema Indonesia-Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IC-CEPA)? Melalui pendekatan kualitatif (studi literatur dan wawancara) dengan menggunakan teori pemilihan Mitra FTA oleh Solis dan Katada (2008), penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis motif keterlibatan Indonesia dalam IC-CEPA. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia memiliki tiga motif atas keterlibatannya dalam IC-CEPA. Pertama, motif ekonomi, yakni untuk mendapatkan akses pasar bagi produk manufaktur khususnya produk unggulan alas kaki dan menghindari adanya trade diversion. Kedua, motif politik yaitu untuk meningkatkan status Indonesia melalui upaya menjadi trade hub bagi kawasan Amerika Latin di Asia Tengara. Ketiga, motif leverage yakni untuk meningkatkan kapasitas Indonesia di sektor pertanian mengingat Chile merupakan salah satu negara memiliki sistem pengelolaan sektor pertanian yang terbaik di dunia.

---

As a country with sixteenth economic ranking in the world (2018), international trade is important for Indonesia. The cooperation is initially focused on countries which become the main trading partners, both on a global and regional scale such as ASEAN. On its development, Indonesia also opened up by establishing a Free Trade Cooperation (FTA) or Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) with other countries outside the region such as Chile in which it's located in Latin America. However, in terms of international trade, the total value of trade between Indonesia and Chile is small and unlike the trading with other countries in the same region. This matter then raises question, why Indonesia establish free trade cooperation with Chile in the Indonesia-Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IC-CEPA) scheme? Through a qualitative approach (literature study and interview) using the theory of FTA partner selection by Solis and Katada (2008), this study aims to analyze the Indonesian motives behind its involvement and its decision to sign the IC-CEPA cooperation with Chile. The results of this study find that Indonesia has three motives for its involvement in IC-CEPA. First, economic motives, those are the need to export its manufactured products, particularly footwear and to avoid trade diversion. Second, political motive, that is to improve Indonesia's status through its efforts by becoming a trade hub for the Latin America countries in Southeast Asian regions. Third, leverage motive, that is to build Indonesia's capacity in the agricultural sector, considering that Chile is one of the countries with the best agricultural sector management system in the world."