Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Aside the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, which was ratified by the Indonesian government with Law No. 11 Year 2013, the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress (NKL Supplementary Protocol) offers great benefits for a “mega biodiversity” country like Indonesia. Despite the lack of awareness of this supplementary protocol, there is an urgent need for its ratification. This legal-normative research aims to look at the existing regulations in Indonesia to support the implementation of the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress, and to explore the readiness of the national legal system on liability and redress for damages resulting from the application of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs). Based on the several existing regulations, Indonesia has the readiness to a certain extent to implement the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress. This finding should be supported with more intensive discussion on the protocol and its implementationl.

Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2013, Pemerintah Indonesia telah meratifikasi The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Selain itu, pada momen yang sama Negara Pihak CBD juga menyepakati the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress (NKL Supplementary Protocol) yang menawarkan “kesempatan” besar bagi negara megabiodiversity seperti Indonesia. Penelitian mormatif yuridis ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan kerangka pengaturan yang sudah ada untuk memungkinkan implementasi NKL Supplementary Protocol ini. Berdasarkan beberapa regulasi yang sudah ada, Indonesia memiliki kesiapan dan sekaligus perlu untuk menerapkan protokol terkait pertanggungjawaban hukum dan kompensasi kerugian yang timbul akibat aplikasi Living Modified Organisms (LMOs).

Abstrak :
Hazard mikrobiologi yang dapat menimbulkan penyakit dan efek kesehatan yang merugikan pada personel laboratorium dapat dikelompokan berdasarkan Risk Group dengan perlindungan dan tindakan pencegahan berupa penerapan Biosafety Level. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui evaluasi kesiapan laboratorium mikrobiologi PT SCI dalam menangani hazard mikrobiologi berdasarkan biosafety level 2. Pengambilan data menggunakan data sekunder dengan review dokumen dan rekaman data, serta pengambilan data primer melalui observasi, pengamatan langsung dan wawancara yang mendalam terhadap para informan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan pengelompokan Hazard Mikrobiologi termasuk dalam Risk Group 2 dengan Biosafety Level yang diterapkan adalah level 2. Evaluasi kesiapan di Laboratorium menunjukan presentase sebesar 80% dengan perlunya perhatian dan peningkatan komitmen baik manajemen maupun seluruh personel terkait fasilitas laboratorium, praktik analisa, perlindungan personal (APD), akses laboratorium, proteksi kebakaran, kebersihan dan kerapihan, praktik dan prosedur umum laboratorium, kontrol teknik umum, program kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja serta pelatihan dan program terkait biosafety, pengelolaan limbah, penyimpanan di lemari es/freezer, penyimpanan bahan kimia, peralatan tabung gas, desain laboratorium dan tanda peringatan laboratorium. Penuhan persyaratan dapat diterapkannya Sistem Manajemen Bio-risiko yang komprehensif dengan mengidentifikasi, menilai, mengendalikan, dan mengevaluasi serta perbaikan berkelanjutan melalui siklus perencanaan, pelaksanaan, peninjauan, dan peningkatan proses serta tindakan yang dilakukan laboratorium untuk mencapai tujuan. ......Microbiological hazards that can cause disease and adverse health effects on laboratory personnel can be grouped based on the Risk Group with protection and preventive measures in the form of applying the Biosafety Level. This study aims to determine the evaluation of the readiness PT SCI's microbiology laboratory in handling microbiological hazards based on biosafety level 2. Collecting data using secondary data by reviewing documents and recording data, as well as collecting primary data through observation, direct observation and in-depth interviews with informants with direct interviews. The results showed that the grouping of Microbiological Hazards included in Risk Group 2 with the level of biosafety or Biosafety Level applied was level 2. Evaluation of readiness in the laboratory showed a percentage of 80% with the need for attention and increased commitment from both management and all personnel related to laboratory facilities,, analytical practices, Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), laboratory access, fire protection, cleanliness and tidiness, general laboratory practices and procedures, general engineering controls, occupational health and safety programs and training and programs related to biosafety, waste management, refrigerator/freezer storage, chemical storage, equipment gas cylinders, laboratory designs and laboratory warning signs. The fulfillment of the requirements can be applied to a comprehensive Bio-risk Management System by identifying, assessing, controlling, and evaluating as well as continuous improvement through the cycle of planning, implementing, reviewing, and improving the processes and actions taken by the laboratory to achieve the objectives.

Abstrak :
"This book, the first in a new series that focuses on treaty implementation for sustainable development, examines key legal aspects of implementing the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at national and international levels. The volume provides a serious contribution to the current legal and political academic debates on biosafety by discussing key issues under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety that affect the further design of national and international law on biosafety, and analyzing recent progress in the development of domestic regulatory regimes for biosafety. It also examines the legal, political, economic, and practical challenges and solutions encountered in recent efforts to develop and implement domestic biosafety regulations, with a focus on developing countries. In the year of the fifth UN Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, at the signature of a new Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Protocol on Liability and Redress, this timely book examines recent developments in biosafety law and policy"--