Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKAmerika Serikat dikenal sebagai negara yang paling protektif terhadap ancaman perdagangan internasional. Pada kasus ini Indonesia terkena imbas dari sifat protektif tersebut. Hal ini tidak terlepas dari kesadaran Amerika Serikat dalam memproteksi industri dalam negeri mereka. Tercerminkan pada United States Tariff Act of 1930 yang dirumuskan jauh sebelum adanya organisasi perdagangan internasional dan peraturan tersebut terus di amandemen seiring dengan adanya putaran di dalam GATT. Tesis ini mencoba menganalisis penetapan bea masuk antidumping yang dikenakan kepada Indonesia pada tahun 2010 berdasarkan perbandingan antara undang-undang Amerika Serikat dengan Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of The General Agreement on Tariffs And Trade 1994 (ADA) yang merupakan perjanjian internasional yang mengatur tentang penerapan antidumping ditingkat perdagangan internasional.

---

ABSTRACTUnited States is known to be the most protective country to the threat of international tread. In this particular case, Indonesia is a affected by United States protectiveness. It is due to the concern of the United States to protect its domestic industry. It is reflected in the United States Tariff Act of 1930 that was codified way before the establishment of international trade organization; and that Act was continuously amended, as the GATT rounds persist. This thesis tries to analyze the imposition of antidumping duties to Indonesia that was occurred in 2010, by comparing the United States’ Act with the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (ADA) which is an international treaty that governs the imposition of antidumping measure in international level, United States is known to be the most protective country to the threat of international tread. In this particular case, Indonesia is a affected by United States protectiveness. It is due to the concern of the United States to protect its domestic industry. It is reflected in the United States Tariff Act of 1930 that was codified way before the establishment of international trade organization; and that Act was continuously amended, as the GATT rounds persist. This thesis tries to analyze the imposition of antidumping duties to Indonesia that was occurred in 2010, by comparing the United States’ Act with the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (ADA) which is an international treaty that governs the imposition of antidumping measure in international level]"

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa ketentuan WTO dan hukumnasional Indonesia berkaitan dengan pengaturan dumping dan antidumping diKawasan Bebas dan upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk mengenakan atau tidakmengenakan Bea Masuk Antidumping pada barang dumping yang akan masuk keKawasan Bebas di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yangbersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder, diantaranyaperaturan perundang-undangan dan buku. Tindakan Antidumping menurutketentuan WTO pelaksanaannya wajib dilakukan apabila telah dipenuhi syaratsyarattindakan dumping dan berdasarkan hasil investigasi Komite Antidumping.Perbandingan antara nilai normal dengan nilai ekspor hasil investigasi tersebutakan mendapatkan suatu marjin dumping yang dinilai sangat penting dalammenentukan besaran pengenaan Bea Masuk Antidumping. Pada praktiknya, beamasuk antidumping justru dibebaskan dalam Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas danPelabuhan Bebas (Kawasan Bebas) sebagaimana Pasal 14 Peraturan PemerintahNomor 10 Tahun 2012 tentang Perlakuan Kepabeanan, Perpajakan, dan CukaiSerta Tata Laksana Pemasukan dan Pengeluaran Barang ke dan dari Serta Beradadi Kawasan yang Telah Ditetapkan sebagai Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas danPelabuhan Bebas. Dengan dibukanya lalu lintas barang yang masuk ke dalamKawasan Bebas tanpa terkena bea masuk, apalagi bea masuk antidumping,ternyata dapat mengakibatkan terjadinya disorientasi pelindungan danpengamanan perdagangan yaitu menimbulkan kerugian produsen ataupun industridalam negeri dan mengakibatkan terhambatnya industri dalam negeri karena kalahbersaing dari produsen luar negeri yang berhasil memasukkan barangnya keKawasan Bebas. Ketentuan WTO mengenai Territorial Application-FrontierTraffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas, memungkinkan masuknya barangke dalam suatu Kawasan Bebas untuk dikenakan Tindakan PemulihanPerdagangan, salah satunya Tindakan Antidumping, sehingga dapat menjadi dasarbagi Pemerintah Indonesia untuk dapat melakukan perubahan pengaturanmengenai bea masuk pada Kawasan Bebas.

---

ABSTRACTThis research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone.;This research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone., This research aims to analyze the provisions of the WTO and theIndonesian national law relating to dumping and anti-dumping regulation in FreeZone and efforts should be made to wear or not to wear Antidumping Duties ondumping of goods that will go to the Free Zone in Indonesia. This research is anormative juridical law using secondary data, such as legislation and books.Antidumping action under the terms of WTO implementation must be done if theconditions have been fulfilled dumping measures and is based on the results of theinvestigation Antidumping Committee. The comparison between the normal valuewith an export value of the results of the investigation will get a dumping marginwhich was considered very important in determining the amount of the impositionof Antidumping Duty. In practice, anti-dumping duties actually released withinthe Free Trade Zone and Free Port (Free Zone) as well as Article 14 ofGovernment Regulation No. 10 of 2012 on the Treatment of Customs, Taxationand Excise And Procedure Entry and goods to and from And Being in the RegionDefined as Free Trade Zone and Free Port. With the opening of freight trafficcoming into the free zone without incurring customs duties, let alone antidumpingduties, it can result in disorientation protection and trade security that iscausing losses of industrial or domestic producers and resulted in inhibition ofdomestic industry because of competition from producers outside who managed toenter the country the goods to the free zone. WTO provisions concerningTerritorial Application-Frontier Traffic-Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas,allowing the entry of goods into a free zone for the Restoration of Commerceimposed measures, one of which Antidumping Measures, which can be the basisfor the Indonesian government to be able to make changes to the settings on dutyentered the free zone.]"

"[ABSTRAKIndustri tekstil merupakan sektor strategis dalam perekonomian suatu negara.Industri tekstil di Indonesia saat ini belum mampu memenuhi kebutuhan domestikakan produk tekstil, sehingga masih diperlukan impor produk tersebut. Namun,banyak dari produk impor tersebut dijual dengan harga dumping sehinggamenimbulkan unfair trade. Salah satu tindakan trade remedies akibat adanyaunfair trade dapat dilakukan melalui pengenaan bea masuk anti dumping.Pengenaan Bea Masuk Anti Dumping untuk produk tekstil sampai saat ini masihsedikit sekali dibandingkan dengan produk-produk dalam negeri lainnya.Pengenaan Bea Masuk Antidumping terhadap produk tekstil yang baru sajaditetapkan oleh Indonesia di tahun 2015 ini ialah terhadap produk Spin DrawnYarn dari Malaysia. Pengenaan bea masuk antidumping tersebut akan dianalisissecara deskriptif dengan melihat kesesuaiannya dengan Antidumping Agreementdan nantinya akan di kaitkan dengan kerugian yang terjadi pada industri tekstil diIndonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThe textile industry is a strategic sector in the economy of a country. The textileindustry in Indonesia has not been able to fulfill their domestic demand that is stillnecessary to import these products. However, many of these imported productssold at dumping prices, giving rise to unfair trade. One of the trade action as aresult of unfair trade remedies can recover through the imposition of anti-dumpingduties. Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty on textile products is still very littlecompared with the products in other countries. Imposition of Antidumping Dutieson textile products newly set by Indonesia in 2015, is against Malaysia for theSpin Drawn Yarn. The imposition of anti-dumping duties will be analyzeddescriptively with the Antidumping Agreement conformity and will be inassociate with the injury incurred in the textile industry in Indonesia;The textile industry is a strategic sector in the economy of a country. The textileindustry in Indonesia has not been able to fulfill their domestic demand that is stillnecessary to import these products. However, many of these imported productssold at dumping prices, giving rise to unfair trade. One of the trade action as aresult of unfair trade remedies can recover through the imposition of anti-dumpingduties. Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty on textile products is still very littlecompared with the products in other countries. Imposition of Antidumping Dutieson textile products newly set by Indonesia in 2015, is against Malaysia for theSpin Drawn Yarn. The imposition of anti-dumping duties will be analyzeddescriptively with the Antidumping Agreement conformity and will be inassociate with the injury incurred in the textile industry in Indonesia, The textile industry is a strategic sector in the economy of a country. The textileindustry in Indonesia has not been able to fulfill their domestic demand that is stillnecessary to import these products. However, many of these imported productssold at dumping prices, giving rise to unfair trade. One of the trade action as aresult of unfair trade remedies can recover through the imposition of anti-dumpingduties. Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty on textile products is still very littlecompared with the products in other countries. Imposition of Antidumping Dutieson textile products newly set by Indonesia in 2015, is against Malaysia for theSpin Drawn Yarn. The imposition of anti-dumping duties will be analyzeddescriptively with the Antidumping Agreement conformity and will be inassociate with the injury incurred in the textile industry in Indonesia]"