Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini berangkat dari adanya proses megapolitansi di Jabodetabek, dimana akibat interaksi dan hubungan fungsional yang terjadi di kawasan Jabodetabek menyebabkan seolah ? olah terjadi proses penyatuan keruangan Jabodetabek menjadi satu kawasan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Hal ini kemudian menimbulkan ekternalitas yang menuntut penanganan secara terintegrasi dari masing-masing daerah di Jabodetabek, melalui sebuah kerjasama dalam kerangka kelembagaan megapolitan di Jabodetabek. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan model kerjasama yang efektif antar daerah di Jabodetabek, prioritas sektor apa yang hendaknya bisa dikerjasamakan serta hambatan apa yang dapat menghambat proses kerjasama tersebut.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang bersumber dari persepsi responden kunci di kawasan Jabodetabek yang kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan model AHP ( Analytical Hierarchi Process ) dapat disimpulkan model kerjasama yang dipilih untuk mengakomodir proses kerjasama di Jabodetabek adalah Regional special district and authorities yang berbentuk sebuah badan otoritas persektor yang menangani sebuah sektor yang dikerjasamakan. Model ini dipilih karena organisasinya lebih sederhana dan ramping (efisien) dan oleh karena hanya menangani sebuah sektor yang dikerjasamakan maka fokus kerja lembaga ini akan menjadi lebih efektif.Sebagai pilot project, otoritas ini diarahkan untuk menangani sektor transportasi yang dianggap sebagai sektor prioritas yang perlu dikerjasamakan di Jabodetabek, hal ini untuk menjamin proses pergerakan penduduk serta aliran barang dan jasa di Jabodetabek secara lebih efisien dan terintegratif. Namun proses kerjasama tersebut terkendala oleh masalah keuangan dan pembiayaan. Dimana secara peraturan perundangan yang ada belum mengatur masalah pembiayan kerjasama secara lebih jelas, sehingga diperlukan kebijakan yang mengatur masalah ini agar proses kerjasama dapat berjalan efektif.

---

This thesis based on megapolitans process in Jabodetabek. In megapolitan area, interaction among regions causes externalities which can be negative effects for them. They must be solved by cooperation models for Jabodetabek area. We try to determine the effective cooperation model by choosing the priority sector and facing the obstacles. This thesis uses the expert judgments on Regional Government.

By AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), we conclude that the cooperation model which can solve the externalities is Regional special district and authorities-sector authority institution that handle sector cooperation. This model is more feasible than others because it has simply structure, more efficient and effective.

As a pilot project, the transportation is must be priority on sector cooperation. It makes citizens, good and service mobility easier, although the sector cooperation has obstacles. The biggest obstacle is financial problem. The cooperation regulation don?t mention the financial scheme clearly, therefore its financial regulation is needed for effective cooperation process."

"This study is about city branding This research is motivated bu the potential of citty branding creation as a way to improve regional competitiveness. The purpose of this study is to descrive the various efforts made by the local government of DIY to improve the competitiveness of the region with city Branding. This research uses the qualitative method data collection method is done by triagulation technigue of data source. While data processing researcher does data reduction. The results obtained in this study are first city Branding DIY has been running well rebranding DIY is likely to increase the competitiveness of regions including local revenue. This is evidenced by the increase in investment achieved by the government of Yogyakarta. It' s just that city branding is still focused on tourrism but it can be used for other sectors. Sicond the DIY rebranding (2014) profides many improvenments especially in terms of concept logo and tagline. In addition,the Yogyakarta provincial government has estabilished city branding councils city branding strategy roadmap and governor regulation of city branding in DIY Its just that there has been no evaluation since the rebranding was done by the provincial government of DIY how this rebranding can be implemented by the local goverment and city branding council and there is no extent to which the strategy in the roadmap implemented"

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai implikasi hukum pembatalan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham oleh Pengadilan karena anggota Direksi yang menyelenggarakan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham RUPS tersebut sedang berperkara melawan Perseroan di Pengadilan dan dianggap tidak berwenang mewakili Perseroan dalam menyelenggarakan RUPS. Pokok permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah implikasi hukum dari pembatalan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan oleh Pengadilan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder antara lain peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan Pengadilan, buku-buku, artikel, dan makalah. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pembatalan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat oleh Pengadilan tidak sekaligus membatalkan perbuatan hukum atau keputusan RUPS yang termuat dalam risalah rapat yang dibuat dibawah tangan. Walaupun Akta Pernyataan Keputusan RUPS dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan, keputusan RUPS tersebut bisa tetap berlaku apabila risalah rapat dibawah tangan tidak dibatalkan juga oleh Pengadilan. Hal ini dikarenakan perbuatan hukum atau keputusan RUPS tersebut termuat dalam risalah rapat yang dibuat dibawah tangan, bukan pada Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses about legal implication of cancellation of Restated Resolutions of General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Company by Court due to its member of Directors who convened the General Meeting of Shareholders is a litigant against the company while the general meeting was being held. This thesis will analyze the legal implication of cancellation of Restated Resolutions of General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Company by Court. In analyzing this, the method of this research is a juridical normative method with statute approach and case approach. The result of this research is the cancellation of Restated Resolutions of General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Company by Court does not nullified the meeting resolutions at the same time. Eventhough the Restated Resolutions cancelled by Court, the meeting resolutions itself can still be applicable if it is not cancelled by the Court. "

"In recent decades, the liability of public authorities has been one of the main areas of development in and at the edges of tort law in Europe, with major reforms implemented or considered at a national level, and a steady stream of major court decisions. During the same period, 'Member State liability' has also been recognised in the law of the EU, and the interplay of principles of national and EU law - and additionally the 'just satisfaction' jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights - evidently warrants close attention.In this context, the aims of the present study are to contribute to the understanding of the law of extra-contractual liability as it applies to public authorities in the legal systems of Europe (and selected non-European jurisdictions), to facilitate its enhancement where necessary or desirable, and to consider the possibilities for harmonisation in the area - specifically, through the extension and adaptation of the Principles of European Tort Law to cover public authority liability.With contributions by:Bjarte Askeland, Ewa Baginska, Jonathan Cardi, Giovanni Comand�, Eugenia Dacoronia, Jef de Mot, Isabelle Durant, Duncan Fairgrieve, Michael Faure, Israel Gilead, Michael D Green, Anne Keirse, Bernhard A Koch, Fran�ois Lich�re, Piotr Machnikowski, Ulrich Magnus, Miquel Mart�n-Casals, Johann Neethling, Luca Nocco, Ken Oliphant, Maria Jos� Reis Rangel de Mesquita, Jordi Ribot, Lubo� Tich�, Vibe Ulfbeck, Pierre Widmer, B�n�dict Winiger.About the editor:Ken Oliphant is a Professor of Tort Law at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom."

"Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengevaluasi permasalahan penatausahaan piutang pajak di DJP, melakukan perbandingan di negara lain; dan memberikan usulan guna mengatasi permasalahan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan studi kasus di DJP dan benchmarking ke otoritas pajak di Selandia Baru, Australia, Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Afrika Selatan, Filipina, dan Kanada sebagai multiple unit analysis. Data dikumpulkan melalui reviu dokumentasi dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya 8 (delapan) permasalahan penatausahaan piutang pajak di DJP. Kesuksesan penatausahaan piutang pajak di negara pembanding tidak lepas dari beberapa faktor seperti sistem yang terintegrasi dan real-time, aplikasi Taxpayer Account, terdapat unit khusus pengelola piutang pajak, adanya program pelatihan bagi debt officer, dan sistem yang menghubungkan otoritas pajak dengan instansi pemroses sengketa. Selain itu negara pembanding telah sepenuhnya mengacu pada IPSAS/GAAP. Guna mengatasi permasalahan piutang pajak, penelitian ini menyarankan agar DJP mengintegrasikan sistem-sistem yang ada di DJP, mengembangkan Taxpayer Account, meningkatkan kualitas SDM dan melakukan supervisi secara berkala, menyusun regulasi berupa revisi PER-08/PJ./2009 dan aturan penegasan untuk proses bisnis DJP yang bersifat recurring, serta membangun sistem pertukaran data yang memadai antara DJP dan Pengadilan Pajak maupun DJP dan DJPB

---

This study aims to analyze the problems in administering DGT's tax receivables, comparing to other countries, and seek solutions to these problems. This study applies a qualitative method with case studies at the DGT in Indonesia and benchmarking to tax authorities in New Zealand, Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Philippines, and Canada as multiple units of analysis. Data collection is carried out through interviews and documentation. The results show eight problems in the administration of tax receivables at DGT. Benchmarking results show most countries have an integrated and real-time system, the Taxpayer Account application, special tax receivable management unit, training program for debt officers, and system interconnection between tax authorities and dispute processing agencies. Some suggested solution to solve these problems are integrating existing systems in DGT, developing Taxpayer Accounts, improving the quality of human resources and conducting regular supervision, revised PER-08/PJ./2009 and affirming rules for DGT's recurring business processes, and building a data exchange system between the DGT and the Tax Court as well as the DGT and Directorate General of the Treasury."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai keterlibatan PMC dalam perang sipil di Angola. Angola merupakan salah satu negara Afrika yang mengalami perang sipil yang sepanjangan, yakni selama tiga dekade (1975 - 2Penelitian ini Hasil menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Untuk penelitian menunjukkanm bahwa keputusan menggunakan jasa PMC tidak lepas dari perkembangan situasi internal dan pemerintah Angola sternai.Kondisi internal Angola sebagai negara yang lemah (weak) di bidang kehidupan menjadikan pemerintah Angola juga tidak menyediakan keamanan bagi rakyatnya, terutama dalam menghadapi kelompok pemberontak UNITA. Selain itu, perkembangan situasi eksternal Angola dengan otoritas swasta dalam bidang keamanan salah satunya pasukan penjaga perdamaian PBB, UNAVEM, dalam menjasinya di Angola, menjadikan PMC sebagai alternatif penyelesaian pemerintah Angola.

---

This thesis discusses the involvement of PMC in the civil war in Angola. Angola is one of the African countries that has experienced a civil war that has lasted for three decades. Angola's internal condition as a weak country in the field of life makes the Angolan government also does not provide security for its people, especially in dealing with the UNITA rebel group.In addition, the development of Angola's external situation with private authorities in the security sector, one of which is the UN peacekeeping force. , UNAVEM, in its operation in Angola, made PMC an alternative solution for the Angolan government."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan terkait lembaga yang baru dibentukberdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2011, yaitu Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yangpada awal pelaksanaan tugasnya menemui banyak permasalahan yang dihadapi,diantaranya terkait pertanggungjawaban pengelolaan keuangan yaitu statuskewajiban perpajakan OJK. Disatu sisi sebagai WAPU, dan lainnya sebagai WP.Selanjutnya, Kementerian Keuangan melalui Keputusan Direktur JenderalPerbendaharaan No. KEP-322/PB/2014, OJK ditetapkan sebagai Unit Badan Lainnya(UBL) dalam konteks pengelolaan dan pertanggungjawaban keuangan negara.Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah: 1. Bagaimana perlakuanpengenaan pajak kepada OJK berdasarkan surat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor S-28/PJ/2015 tanggal 4 Februari 2015? 2. Bagaimana status dan kewajiban perpajakanyang tepat diterapkan kepada OJK?Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yangdilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Data yangdigunakan dalam tesis ini adalah bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, danbahan hukum tersier. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan suatu kegiatan studidokumen terhadap data sekunder.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pungutan pajak kepada OJK, tidak akan efektifhingga ditetapkan dalam suatu produk perundang-undangan sebagaimana Pasal 23Aamandemen ketiga Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

---

ABSTRACTThis research raised issues related to the newly formed institutions under IndonesianLaw No. 21/2011, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan who is in the early exercise of their dutiesencountered many problems faced, which were related to financial managementaccountability, namely OJK status of tax obligations. On one hand as WAPU, andothers as WP. Furthermore, the Ministry of Finance through the Director General ofTreasury letter No. KEP-322 / NT / 2014, OJK sets as Other Board Unit (UBL) inthe context of financial management and accountability the state.Issues examined in this research are: 1. How does the tax to OJK based on the letterof the Directorate General of Taxation No. S-28 / PJ / 2015 dated February 4, 2015?2. What is the status and tax obligations are applied to OJK?The research using normative research method, it is law research conducted withresearching library materials or secondary materials. The materials using in thisresearch are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legalmaterials. The collection of materials conducted with the study of documents forsecondary materials.The results showed that the determination OJK as the subject of taxes and OJKincome as taxes objects, will not be effective until a law is defined as of Article 23Aof the third amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945;This research raised issues related to the newly formed institutions under IndonesianLaw No. 21/2011, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan who is in the early exercise of their dutiesencountered many problems faced, which were related to financial managementaccountability, namely OJK status of tax obligations. On one hand as WAPU, andothers as WP. Furthermore, the Ministry of Finance through the Director General ofTreasury letter No. KEP-322 / NT / 2014, OJK sets as Other Board Unit (UBL) inthe context of financial management and accountability the state.Issues examined in this research are: 1. How does the tax to OJK based on the letterof the Directorate General of Taxation No. S-28 / PJ / 2015 dated February 4, 2015?2. What is the status and tax obligations are applied to OJK?The research using normative research method, it is law research conducted withresearching library materials or secondary materials. The materials using in thisresearch are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legalmaterials. The collection of materials conducted with the study of documents forsecondary materials.The results showed that the determination OJK as the subject of taxes and OJKincome as taxes objects, will not be effective until a law is defined as of Article 23Aof the third amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, This research raised issues related to the newly formed institutions under IndonesianLaw No. 21/2011, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan who is in the early exercise of their dutiesencountered many problems faced, which were related to financial managementaccountability, namely OJK status of tax obligations. On one hand as WAPU, andothers as WP. Furthermore, the Ministry of Finance through the Director General ofTreasury letter No. KEP-322 / NT / 2014, OJK sets as Other Board Unit (UBL) inthe context of financial management and accountability the state.Issues examined in this research are: 1. How does the tax to OJK based on the letterof the Directorate General of Taxation No. S-28 / PJ / 2015 dated February 4, 2015?2. What is the status and tax obligations are applied to OJK?The research using normative research method, it is law research conducted withresearching library materials or secondary materials. The materials using in thisresearch are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legalmaterials. The collection of materials conducted with the study of documents forsecondary materials.The results showed that the determination OJK as the subject of taxes and OJKincome as taxes objects, will not be effective until a law is defined as of Article 23Aof the third amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945]"

"Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) yang diusul oleh negara-negara yang tergabung dalam G20 dan OECD ditujukan untuk mengatasi bentuk penghindaran maupun penggelapan pajak pada negara yang terkenal akan tax haven. Penelitian ini membahas dua rumusan permasalahan, yaitu pengaturan kebijakan terkait prinsip rahasia bank di Indonesia, Swiss dan Singapura dan dampak pengaturan Automatic Exchange of Information perpajakan terhadap prinsip rahasia bank yang diatur di Indonesia, Swiss, dan Singapura. Metode penelitian yang digunakan, yaitu penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan melakukan kajian terhadap penerapan teori-teori dan norma-norma hukum terhadap implementasinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan prinsip rahasia bank di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 sebagaimana diubah oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah. Di Swiss, pengaturan prinsip rahasia bank diatur Federal Law on Banks and Saving Banks 1934 dan beberapa yurisprudensi. Di Singapura, pengaturan prinsip rahasia bank diatur dalam Banking Act Chapter 19 (Revised Edition 2008). Adapun dampak dari kebijakan AEoI terhadap rahasia bank di Indonesia, Swiss, dan Singapura mengakibatkan adanya perubahan karakteristik rahasia bank, wewenang otoritas pajak dalam pembukaan rahasia bank dan jangkauan keberlakuan nasabah selaku subjek yang dituju. Peneliti menyarankan perlu dilakukan perubahan ketentuan mengenai karakteristik subjek pelapor entitas yang wajib dilaporkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 19 ayat (2a) PMK No. 19/PMK.03/2018 agar pengaturan subjek pelapor yang dituju ditentukan secara tegas, sehingga tidak dikenakan kepada subjek pelapor yang merupakan nasabah domestik yang tidak memiliki domisili selain di negara Indonesia.

---

Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) proposed by countries incorporated in the G20 and OECD aimed at overcoming forms of avoidance and tax evasion in countries that are known for tax havens. As for countries that are AEoI participating countries, including Indonesia, Switzerland and Singapore. This study discusses two formulation of the problem, namely policy arrangements related to the principles of bank confidential in Indonesia, Switzerland and Singapore and the impact of the regulation of Automatic Exchange of Information taxation on the secret principles of regulated banks in Indonesia, Switzerland and Singapore. The research method used is juridical-normative research by conducting a study of the application of theories and legal norms to their implementation.

The results of the study indicate that the regulation of the principle of bank confidential in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 7 of 1992 amanded by Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking and Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. In Switzerland, the regulation of the principle of bank confidential is regulated in Federal Law on Banks and Savings Banks 1934 and several jurisprudences. In Singapore, regulation of the principle of bank secrecy is regulated in Banking Act Chapter 19 (Revised Edition 2008). The impact of the AEoI policy on bank secrets in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Singapore has resulted in changes in the banks secret characteristics, the authority of the tax authority in opening bank secrets and the range of customer validity as the intended subject.

The researcher suggests that changes in provisions regarding the characteristics of the reporting subject must be carried out which must be reported as stipulated in Article 19 paragraph (2a) PMK No. 19/PMK.03/2018 so that the intended subject matter of the reporting subject is determined so that it is not imposed on the reporting subject who is a domestic customer who does not have a domicile other than in the country of Indonesia."

"Pergeseran kompetensi absolut dari peradilan umum (PN) ke peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN) dalam mengadili gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum oleh penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/OOD) secara tiba-tiba berdasarkan Perma 2/2019 memunculkan 2 (dua) persoalan utama yakni perbedaan parameter penilai tindakan pemerintah dari segi hukum perdata dengan hukum administrasi negara dan pengurangan jangka waktu mengajukan gugatan dari 30 (tiga puluh) tahun menjadi 90 (sembilan puluh) hari. Penelitian ini berbentuk yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan terdapat perbedaan parameter penilai Gugatan OOD di PN dan PTUN, dimana PN menggunakan 4 parameter alternatif berupa pertentangan dengan 1) peraturan perundang-undangan; 2) hak subjektif; 3) kesusilaan; atau 4) kepatutan, sedangkan PTUN menggunakan 5 parameter alternatif berupa 1) peraturan; 2) AUPB; 3) kewenangan; 4) prosedur; atau 5) substansi. Idealnya, PTUN menyerap parameter PN mengenai bersifat melawan hukum agar tolak ukur pengujian di PTUN mencakup hukum tidak tertulis. Jangka waktu pengajuan Gugatan OOD ke PTUN terbatas 90 (sembilan puluh) hari sejak tindakan tersebut dilakukan dan diketahui, konsep ini tidak memberikan perlindungan hukum yang tepat bagi warga masyarakat. Idealnya, Gugatan OOD dapat diajukan kapanpun sejak muncul kerugian nyata atau kerugian potensial yang sangat dekat bagi warga masyarakat.

---

The absolute competency-shifting in adjudicating a lawsuits against the law by authorities from the general court to the state administration court suddenly based on Supreme Court Regulation No. 2/2019 raises 2 (two) issues regarding differences in the parameters of evaluating government actions in terms of civil law with state administration law and a significant reduction in the time period for filing a lawsuit from 30 (thirty) years to 90 (ninety) days. This research takes the form of a normative juridical approach to the rule of law. This study concludes there are differences in the parameters of the OOD Claims between general and administrative court. PN uses 4 alternative parameters in the form of conflict against 1) law regulation; 2) other people subjective rights; 3) morality; or 4) propiety. Administrative court uses 5 alternative parameters in the form of 1) statutory regulations; 2) General Principle of Good Governance; 3) authority; 4) procedure; or 5) substance. Ideally, the Administrative Court absorbs parameter from the general court. The time period for filing an OOD Lawsuit to administrative court is limited to 90 (ninety) days from the time the action was taken and it is known, this concept does not provide proper legal protection for community members. Since the Administrative Lawsuit and the OOD Lawsuit have different loss characteristics, ideally, the expiration date of the OOD Lawsuit can be filed at any time since a real loss or potential loss is very close to the community members. "

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai keterlibatan Pemerintah Daerah yang dalam pengangkatan perangkat desa berdasarkan peraturan perundang undangan dan adanya Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 28 P/Hum/2018 yang membatalakan Pasal 9 ayat (1), ayat (2), Pasal 11 ayat (2) Perda Kabupaten Kediri Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Perangkat Desa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan jawaban bahwa pemerintah daerah mempunyai peran dalam pengangkatan perangkat desa dimana pemerintah daerah juga mendapatkan amanat dari Undang Undang untuk mengatur hal yang lebih konkret dalam pengangkatan perangkat desa. Tindak lanjut dari Putusan MA Pemerintah Kabupaten Kediri membentuk Peraturan Bupati Kediri Nomor 56 Tahun 2018 sebagaimana diubah dengan Peraturan Bupati Nomor 48 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Pelaksana Perda Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang pengangkatan dan pemberhentian perangkat desa. MA membatalakan Perda kemudian ditindak lanjuti dalam Perbup, secara hiearakis Perda mempunyai kedudukan yang lebih tinggi dari Perbup. Perbup Nomor 48 Tahun 2021 melibatkan Pihak Ketiga merupakan keterlibatan secara tidak langsung oleh Pemerintah Daerah, terlebih pihak ketiga lebih dominan dalam pengangkatan perangkat desa karena melaksanakan ujian tulis yang hasil dari ujian dengan nilai tertinggi mengikat Kepala Desa untuk diangkat menjadi perangkat desa. keabsahan pengangaktan perangkat desa dengan keterlibatan pemerintah daerah yang berlebihan mempengaruhi keabsahan pengangkatan perangkat desa.

---

This research discusses the involvement of the Local Government in the village authorities levitation based on laws and regulations and the Supreme Court Decision Number 28 P/Hum/2018, which annuls Article 9 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), Article 11 paragraph (2) of Kediri Regency Regional Regulation (henceforth Perda-Peraturan Daerah) Number 5 of 2017 concerning Levitation and Dismissal of Village Authorities. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. This study found that the local government has a role in the levitation of village authorities, where the local government is also mandated by law to regulate more factual matters in the levitation of village authorities. Following the Supreme Court Decision, the Government of Kediri Regency established Kediri Regent Regulation (henceforth Perbup-Peraturan Bupati) Number 56 of 2018 as amended by Perbup Number 48 of 2021 concerning Regulations Implementing Perda Number 5 of 2017 concerning the levitation and dismissal of village authorities. The Supreme Court annulled the Perda and followed up on the Perbup. Hierarchically the Perda has a higher position than the Perbup. Perbup Number 48 of 2021 involves a third party, which is an indirect involvement by the Local Government, especially since third parties are more dominant in the levitation of village authorities because they carry out written exams, the results of which with the highest scores are binding on the Village Head to be appointed as village authorities. The validity of the levitation of village authorities with excessive local government involvement affects the validity of the levitation of village officials"