Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTThis thesis tries to describe the transposition from adjectives to verbs and vice versa in standard Javanese.In this case, each of the major word-classes (substantive, verb, adjective) is determined primarily and accordingly to a set of its morphological features which differ in the whole aspects from the others. Except for those features, a set of its syntactical valences are also identified. Adjectives and verbs in Javanese are two different word-classes. Each of them is a word-class system which covers a set of morphological categories-i.e. a series of words with identical formal features corresponding to identical semantic features which differ in the whole aspects from each other.The verbal system is divided into two classes (class I and class II). Morphologically, class I is characterized by di-D category (passive) which is in contrast with N-D category (active-transitive), whereas class II isn't, although it has N-D category (intransitive). Structurally, there are some important differences between the two classes caused by this principal difference. Each of the classes is also separated into two parts (part A and part B). Morphologically, part B is characterized by two specific categories: maq-D 'to do D suddenly' and patin-D ?plural subject involved to do something varies in rhythm and intensities?, and semantically is characterized by "emotive-expressive" or "onomatopoeic" semantic values, whereas part A isn?t. The object being studied in this thesis is the verbal morphological proceeds whether productive or improductive which transpose adjectives in monomorphemic category into verbs (or maybe called "deadjectival, verbal categories") and the adjectival morphological procedes which transpose verbs into adjectives (or maybe called "deverbal, adjectival categories") Based on the data, we know that the great parts of the monomorphemic adjectives can be transposed into verbs class II A (none into class II B) and only some of them can be transposed into class I A (none into class I B). Most of the transpositional categories in verb II A are productive; their formal forms: N-D-i, N-D-ake; ke-D-an; di-D-i, di-D-ake; ka-D-an, ka-D-ake; -in-D-an, -in-D-ake; taq-D-i, taq-D-ake; taq-D-ane, taq-D-ne; koq-D-i, koq-D-ake; D-ana, D-na; D-I?, _D-ke?, D-in-D-an, D-in-D-ake; D-D--an; but there are some other categories which are improductive. On the other hand, all of the transpositional categories in verb I A are improductive. There are only three procedes of adjectives (-an, ke-en, -em-//-um-) which transpose verbs into adjectives. All of the transpositional categories of adjective are improductive. In this thesis, we also know that a certain word-class system is not totally transposed into the other."

"Tugas akhir ini membahas pergeseran bentuk (transposisi) yang terjadi dalam penerjemahan adjektiva atributif bahasa Jerman ke dalam bahasa Indonesia pada sebuah artikel yang berjudul Ein Leben für die Tiere dalam majalah NADI. Pergeseran bentuk dalam penerjemahan tidak dapat dihindari karena setiap bahasa memiliki sistem yang berbeda.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif-kualitatif dengan model komparatif. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori pergeseran dalam penerjemahan oleh J.C. Catford. Selain itu, teori mengenai kategori sintaksis bahasa Jerman oleh Pittner dan Berman, teori pembentukan kata bahasa Jerman oleh Michael Lohde, dan teori mengenai tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia oleh Hasan Alwi, dkk. juga digunakan dalam penelitian ini sebagai teori penunjang.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semua tipe pergeseran bentuk, baik transposisi tataran maupun kategori, terjadi dalam penerjemahan adjektiva atributif bahasa Jerman ke bahasa Indonesia. Bahkan, dalam penerjemahan satu adjektiva, dapat terjadi beberapa jenis pergeseran bentuk secara bersamaan.

---

This research discusses about the shifts in translation (transpositions) that occur in the translation of German attributive adjectives into Indonesian in an article entitled Ein Leben für die Tiere in NADI magazine. Shifts in translation are inevitable because each language has different systems.The method used in this research is descriptive-qualitative method with a comparative model. The theory used in this research is the translation shift theory by J.C. Catford, meanwhile the theory about German syntax categories by Pittner and Berman, the theory of German word formation by Michael Lohde, and theories about Indonesian grammar by Hasan Alwi, et al. are also used in this study as supporting theories.This study shows that all types of translation shifts, both level and category transpositions, occurred in the translation of attributive adjectives from German into Indonesian. In fact, in the translation of an adjective, several types of shifts can occur simultaneously."