Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Revisi Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (UU KPK) menjadi salah satu kebijakan kontroversial yang ditentang oleh sejumlah pihak di Indonesia. Pertentangan tersebut didasari oleh penilaian bahwa revisi UU KPK adalah undang-undang yang pro koruptor akibat adanya sejumlah kebijakan yang dinilai melemahkan kinerja KPK dalam melakukan upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Salah satu pihak yang menentang keras pengesahan revisi UU KPK adalah LSM bernama Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). Pertentangan tersebut selanjutnya dilihat dalam kacamata kontrol sosial korupsi sebagai bentuk reaksi sosial informal atas upaya penanganan tindak penyimpangan yang merujuk pada korupsi. Kontrol sosial oleh ICW dimanifestasikan dalam upaya pembatalan revisi UU KPK yang akan dijelaskan secara kriminologis. Analisis mengenai kondisi gerakan sosial selama advokasi berlangsung juga akan dijelaskan dengan menggunakan teori Status Politik oleh Gusfield yang menekankan aspek dramatistik, aksi politik, konflik prestise dan pengakuan prestise

---

The amendment of the Law about Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) or UU KPK is one among several disputed policy that enrage many parties in Indonesia. The dispute roots on the view how the amendment of this law turns the law to be very lenient towards the corruptors because there are several policies that seem to debilitate KPK in eradicating corruption. One of the strongest opposing parties against this amendment is a non-government organization named Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). This opposition then will be examined through the view of social control against corruption crime as an informal social reaction to the attempt to handle the occuring deviation, referring to corruption. ICW has manifested their social control in nullification of the revision of UU KPK. These attempts will be annotated criminologically. The analysis regarding the social movement during the advocation will be seen from Gusfield’s theory of status politics, emphasizing on the aspects of dramatistics, political action, prestige conflicts, and prestige recognition."

"Urban Criminology offers an accessible analysis of our urban condition, viewed through the prism of crime, disorder and social harm. This book gathers cutting-edge treatments, research field reports and critical examinations of crime and harm in cities, from the disciplines of urban studies and criminology. The social, economic and political composition of cities and the various inequalities that mark out and drive the problem of crime in many cities today are foregrounded. Readers follow a series of thematic engagements, generating a deeper understanding of a range of key areas that include problems of violence, social and spatial divisions, housing, policing and the role of the urban economy in issues of financial crime. This book comes at a time of rising crime in many cities and complex responses by city administrations and communities. It presents a critical, political thesis - that crime in cities must be understood with reference to the varying social structures, political forces and economic opportunities of cities. These influences intersect to produce dramatic variations in victimisation and attempts at social control, often felt most strongly around class and gender divisions. To understand crime, we must better understand the life of the city. Urban Criminology seeks to present an integrated framework that brings to life these key issues and seeks to enthuse students of our urban condition - to locate the harms within it and to identify ways of reducing the risk of crime. This book is ideal reading for all students with an interest in cities, crime, community life, urban sociology and urban cultures."