Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pandemi COVID-19 yang menyerang hampir seluruh belahan dunia membuat setiap manusia harus mematuhi protokol kesehatan yang mencangkup mengurangi kegiatan keluar rumah. Disebabkan karena satu dan lain hal, kelompok usia dewasa awal masih banyak yang bepergian keluar rumah. Peneliti mengajukan bahwa permasalahan ini dapat dijelaskan dengan memahami persepsi risiko individu. Penelitian ini menguji mengenai pengaruh persepsi risiko terhadap intensi bepergian di masa pandemi COVID-19. Dalam penelitian ini, persepsi risiko memiliki lima faktor, yaitu risiko kesehatan, risiko psikologis, risiko keuangan, risiko destinasi, dan risiko perjalanan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian korelasional (N = 142) dan menggunakan analisis multiple regression untuk melihat kelima faktor persepsi risiko terhadap intensi bepergian selama pandemi COVID-19 pada kelompok usia dewasa awal (18 – 25 tahun) di daerah Jabodetabek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor risiko kesehatan ( β = 0.769, p = 0.015), risiko destinasi ( β = -0.291, p = 0.023), dan risiko perjalanan ( β = -0.598, p = 0.009) memiliki pengaruh terhadap intensi bepergian di masa pandemi COVID-19. Jika dilihat secara keseluruhan, risiko kesehatan, risiko psikologis, risiko keuangan, risiko destinasi, dan risiko perjalanan memiliki pengaruh terhadap intensi bepergian sebesar 13.7% (F = 4.304, p = 0.001, β = 0.137).

---

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread almost all parts of the world has forced everyone to implement health protocols which include reducing activities outside the house. For some reasons, there are still many groups of young adults who travel outside. The researcher proposed that this problem can be explained by understanding their risk perceptions. This study examines the effect of risk perception on travel intention during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, risk perception has five factors, including health risk, psychological risk, financial risk, destination risk, and travel risk. This study is a correlational study (N = 142) and uses multiple regression analysis to examine the five risk factors of risk perception on travel intention during the COVID-19 pandemic in the young adult age group (18-25 years) in the Greater Jakarta area. The results showed that health risk factors (β = 0.769, p = 0.015), destination risk (β = -0.291, p = 0.023), and travel risk (β = -0.598, p = 0.009) had an influence on travel intentions in the future. COVID-19 pandemic. When viewed as a whole, health risk, psychological risk, financial risk, destination risk, and travel risk have an influence on travel intention by 13.7% (F = 4.304, p = 0.001, R^2 = 0.137)"

"Pilihan politik dan gejala polarisasi massa di Indonesia mungkin berhubungan dengan perilaku masyarakat dan persepsi risiko mereka. Kami ingin mengetahui hubungan tersebut melalui studi kombinasi regresi panel dan OLS yang menguji dampak indikator hasil pemilihan presiden tahun 2019 terhadap hasil pencarian beberapa kata kunci via mesin pencari Google yang merepresentasikan persepsi risiko. Studi kami menemukan bahwa perolehan suaraJokowi pada pemilu 2019 berasosiasi secara signifikan dengan persepsi risiko masyarakat selama awal pandemi Covid-19. Estimasi kata kunci yang berkaitan dengan corona, bantuan sosial, dan PSBB melalui kontrol kasus Covid-19 menunjukan provinsi dengan pangsa suara Jokowi semakin tinggi berhubungan dengan pencarian informasi masyarakat yang semakin rendah. Seiring waktu, hasil estimasi lain terkait kata kunci vaksinasi justru menunjukan hubungan positif dimana provinsi dengan pangsa suara Jokowi yang semakin tinggi berhubungan dengan pencarian masyarakat yang juga semakin tinggi. Sedangkan hasil regresi untuk perubahan kunjungan tidak esensial dan kata kunci yang terkait dengan kondisi ekonomi memberikan hasil yang tidak signifikan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pilihan politik mungkin signifikan dalam membentuk persepsi risiko awal individu yang mempengaruhi reaksi mereka terkait kebijakan selama krisis kesehatan dan ekonomi yang tidak terduga.

---

Political choice and the mass polarisation symptoms in Indonesia may be related to mass behavior and risk perception. We want to estimate its association through a combination of panel regression and OLS studies that examine the impact of the 2019 presidential election (pilpres) on the search results of several keywords via the Google search engine representing risk perception. Our study found that Jokowi's vote gains in the 2019 elections were significantly associated with public risk perceptions during the early Covid-19 pandemic. Each keyword estimations related to corona, social assistance (bansos), and PSBB through covid-19 case-control show that provinces with a higher share of Jokowi's vote are associated with lower public information searches. Over time, the estimation result related to the keyword vaccination showed a positive relationship. The province with a higher share of Jokowi's vote was related to the higher search for the society. At the same time, regression for non-essential visits and keywords related to economic conditions give insignificant results. These findings suggest that political choices may significantly shape individuals' initial risk perceptions, influencing their issues and policy-related reactions during unexpected health and economic crises"

"Di masa pandemi COVID-19, menerapkan perilaku social distancing menjadi hal penting dilakukan untuk memutuskan rantai penyebaran virus Corona. Mengacu pada Health Belief Model, penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peran dari perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, framing, literasi eHealth, serta jenis kelamin yang secara bersamaan memprediksi intensi social distancing pada masyarakat Bali. Karakteristik partisipan penelitian ini minimum berusia 18 tahun, tingkat pendidikan minimum berada di jenjang SMA, dan berdomisili di Bali. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan desain cross-sectional study. Total partisipan berjumlah 406 orang. Berdasarkan hasil multiple linear regression analysis, ditemukan bahwa perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, literasi eHealth, framing, serta jenis kelamin secara bersamaan memengaruhi intensi social distancing (R2 = .097, p < 0.05). Perceived severity menjadi prediktor paling kuat dalam model ini, diikuti oleh jenis kelamin, kemudian perceived susceptibility. Dalam penelitian ini, baik framing maupun literasi eHealth tidak menjadi prediktor intensi social distancing. Hasil penelitian ini dapat dijadikan gambaran serta referensi untuk penelitian berikutnya.

---

During the COVID-19 pandemic, implementing social distancing behavior is an important thing to do to break the chain of spreading the Corona virus. Referring to the Health Belief Model, this study aims to determine the role of perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, framing, eHealth literacy, and gender which simultaneously predict social distancing intentions in Balinese people. The characteristics of the participants in this study are at least 18 years old, the minimum education level is at the high school level, and domiciled in Bali. This research is an experimental study with a cross-sectional study design. The total participants were 406 people. Based on the results of multiple linear regression analysis, it was found that perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, eHealth literacy, framing, and gender simultaneously affected social distancing intentions (R2 = .097, p < 0.05). Perceived severity is the strongest predictor in this model, followed by gender, then perceived susceptibility. In this study, neither framing nor eHealth literacy were predictors of social distancing intentions. The results of this study can be used as an illustration and reference for future research."

"Vaksin COVID-19 sudah berhasil diciptakan dan memiliki potensi untuk mengakhiri pandemi COVID-19, tetapi tidak semua orang bersedia untuk menerimanya. Intellectual Humility (IH) ditemukan sebagai salah satu prediktor intensi vaksinasi seseorang. Orang yang rendah hati secara intelektual diduga lebih terbuka untuk menerima segala jenis informasi, sehingga memiliki persepsi risiko terhadap COVID-19, sikap terhadap vaksin COVID-19, dan kepercayaan terhadap ilmuwan dan ahli kesehatan yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kembali hubungan IH dengan intensi vaksinasi dan menguji efek mediasi dari variabel persepsi risiko, sikap terhadap vaksin, dan kepercayaan pada hubungan tersebut. Sejumlah warga negara Indonesia (N = 261, M usia = 20,8, SD = 1,93) yang tinggal di berbagai kota besar di Indonesia mengisi Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale (CIHS), COVID-19 Perceived Risk Scale (CPRS), Anti-vaccination Attitudes (VAX) Scale, sebuah pertanyaan mengenai kepercayaan mereka terhadap ilmuwan, dan dua pertanyaan mengenai intensi vaksinasi COVID-19. Hasil uji analisis mediasi menunjukkan bahwa IH berkorelasi secara positif dan signifikan dengan intensi vaksinasi COVID-19 (b = 0.063, t = 4,096, p < .001) dan hubungan ini dimediasi oleh sikap yang positif terhadap vaksin COVID-19 (b = 0.054, t = 0,512, p < .001) dan kepercayaan terhadap ilmuwan yang mengembangkan vaksin (b = 0.013, t = 2.982, p < .01). Selain itu, peneliti juga menemukan bahwa IH berhubungan secara signifikan dengan aspek kognitif, tetapi tidak dengan aspek afektif dari persepsi risiko. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa IH tidak dapat memengaruhi emosi negatif dari kejadian yang bersifat mengancam kesehatan atau nyawa. Implikasi dari penelitian ini mempertegas manfaat IH dalam perilaku sehat individu, sehingga perlu diajarkan dan ditanamkan pada individu.

---

Vaccine COVID-19 has been developed and may potentially end the COVID-19 pandemic, but not everyone is willing to accept it. Intellectual humility (IH) was found to be one of the predictors of a person's vaccination intention. Intellectually humble people are more open to receiving all kinds of information, so they are expected to have higher perceptions of risk to COVID-19, attitudes towards the vaccine COVID-19, and trust in scientists and health experts. This study aimed to re-examine the relationship between IH and vaccination intention and the mediating effect of risk perception, attitude towards vaccines, and trust. Indonesian citizens (N = 261, M age = 20.8, SD = 1.93) who live in various big cities in Indonesia fill out the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale (CIHS), COVID-19 Perceived Risk Scale (CPRS), Anti-vaccination Attitudes (VAX) Scale, a question about their trust in scientists, and two questions about the intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. The results of the mediation analysis showed that IH was positively and significantly correlated with the intention of vaccination COVID-19 (b = 0.063, t = 4.096, p < .001) and this relationship was mediated by a positive attitude towards the vaccine COVID-19 (b = 0.054, t = 0.512, p < .001) and trust towards scientists who developed the vaccine (b = 0.013, t = 2,982, p < .01). In addition, the researcher also found that IH was significantly related to the cognitive aspect but not to the affective aspect of risk perception. This finding indicates that IH cannot influence negative emotions from events that are health or life-threatening. The implication of this study confirms IH's benefits on inducing healthy behavior, thus it needs to be taught and instilled in individuals."