Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Anterior knee pain (AKP) sering disamakan dengan nyeri patellofemoral, merupakan keluhan yang sering dirasakan dari individu yang aktif secara fisik. Pada militer kejadian AKP sering tidak terlaporkan sehingga diperlukan instrumen evaluasi luaran klinis khususnya pada populasi militer. Anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) atau Skor Kujala, dalam Bahasa Indonesia merupakan instrumen yang sudah terbukti sahih dan andal mengevaluasi keterbatasan fungsional pada pasien umum dengan diagnosis patellofemoral pain syndrome. Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menguji kesahihan dan keandalan kuesioner AKPS versi Bahasa Indonesia pada prajurit militer khususnya Kostrad dengan nyeri lutut anterior. Metode penelitian adalah studi potong lintang dengan jumlah subjek 34 orang yang sesuai kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi. Subjek kemudian dilakukan inform consent, pemeriksaan fisik, pengisian kuesioner, dan dilakukan test-retest kuesioner pada hari ke tiga sejak pengisian pertama. Hasil penelitian didapatkan koefisien korelasi antara 0,423-0,779, dan Cronbach’s alpha keseluruhan adalah 0,806. Nilai ICC 0,993 dengan tingkat kepercayaan 95%. Hasil analisis menunjukkan nilai korelasi dan konsistensi internal diatas nilai minimal yang berarti sahih dan andal dengan tingkat signifikansi p<0.05. Kesimpulannya, AKPS versi Bahasa Indonesia terbukti sahih dan andal digunakan sebagai alat ukur keterbatasan fungsional penderita nyeri lutut anterior pada prajurit militer.

---

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is often referred to as patellofemoral pain and is often felt in physically active individuals. The incidence of AKP often goes unreported in the military, so clinical outcome evaluation instruments are needed, especially in the military population. Anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) or Kujala Score in the Indonesian version, is an instrument that has been proven valid and reliable to evaluate functional limitations in patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the AKPS questionnaire on military soldiers, especially Kostrad with anterior knee pain. Study design is cross sectional with the total of subject are 34 that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were then given informed consent, physical examination, filling out the questionnaire, and a test-retest was conducted for filling out the questionnaire on the third day after the first filling. The results showed that the correlation coefficient was between 0.423-0.779, and the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.806. The ICC value is 0.993 with a 95% confidence level. The results of the analysis show that the correlation and internal consistency values are above the minimum value, which means they are valid and reliable with a significance level of p<0.05. In conclusion, the Indonesian version of the AKPS proved valid and reliable to measure functional limitations in patients with anterior knee pain in military soldiers."

"Latar belakang: Anterior knee pain (AKP) merupakan penyebab utama terjadinyapermasalahan yang persisten paska dilakukannya TKR. Saat ini di Indonesia belumterdapat data mengenai luaran ini untuk mengevaluasi paska dilakukannya operasiTKR, oleh karenanya kami merasa perlu untuk dilakukannya penelitian ini.Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kohort retrospektif. Subjek adalahpasien yang menjalani operasi TKR di RS Cipto Mangunkusomo sejak Januari 2011sampai Januari 2019. Pada penelitian ini, didapatkan total 69 lutut dimana 39 lututdilakukan tindakan non-resurfacing sementara 30 lutut dilakukan resurfacing.Pasien dengan revisi TKR, riwayat infeksi sendi lutut atau tumor, implantloosening, riwayat operasi pada sendi lutut sebelumnya di eksklusi dari penelitianini.Hasil: Pada kelompok non-resurfacing terdapat 32 lutut perempuan (82,1%) dan 7lutut laki-laki (17,9%), sementara kelompok resurfacing terdapat 22 lututperempuan (73,3%) dan 8 lutut laki-laki (26,7%). Baik pada kelompok nonresurfacingdan resurfacing, terdapat peningkatan skor paska operatif joint motion(p<0,001) dan expectation (p=0,046) dengan pengukuran KSS, namun nilaisatisfaction dibandingkan preoperative dan paska operatif pada kedua kelompokmenunjukan perbedaan yang tidak bermakna (p=0,314) dibandingkan dengansebelum dilakukannya operasi. Pada penilaian dengan kuesioner Kujala, ditemukanperbedaan bermakna skor total (47 [42-58] vs 55 [45-63]; p < 0,001), limp (3 [3-5]vs 5 [2-5]; p < 0,001), support (3 [3-5] vs 5 [3-5]; p < 0,001), walking (2 [2-3] vs 2[2-5]; p < 0,035), running (0 [0-6] vs 3 [0-8]; p < 0,001), jumping (0 [0-0] vs 3 [0-8]; p = 0,010), dan flexion deficiency (3 [0-3] vs 3 [0-5]; p = 0,021).Kesimpulan: Kami menemukan bahwa TKR non-resurfasing berhubungan dengankejadian AKP. Namun tidak terdapat perbedaan skala nyeri diantara kelompokresurfacing dan non-resurfacing patella. Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan signifikanskor Kujala dan KSS pada kedua kelompok.

---

Background: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a main problem that commonly occurs

after total knee replacement (TKR). In Indonesia, there are no data regarding this

outcome.

Methods: This study aims to evaluate AKP after TKR. This was a retrospective

study. Subjects were patients who underwent TKR from January 2011 to January

2019.

Results: There were 69 knees in this study, in which 39 subjects were nonresurfaced.

Those with revision TKR, history of infected knee joint or tumor,

implant loosening, history of infected knee joint, were excluded from this study. In

the non-resurfaced group, there were 32 (82.1%) women’s knees and 7 (17.9%)

men’s knees. Whereas, in the resurfaced group, there were 22 (73.3%) women’s

knees, and 8 (26.7%) men’s knees. In both the non-resurfaced and resurfacing

groups, there was an increase in joint motion scores (p<0.001) and expectation

(p=0.046) by measuring KSS but satisfaction scores compared to preoperative and

postoperative in both groups showed no significant differences (p=0.314)

compared to before surgery. In the assessment using the Kujala questionnaire,

differences in total score (47 [42-58] vs 55 [45-63]; p <0.001), limping (3 [3-5] vs

5 [2-5]; p <0.001 ), support (3 [3-5] vs 5 [3-5]; p <0.001), walking (2 [2-3] vs 2

[2-5]; p <0.035), running (0 [0- ] 6] vs 3 [0-8]; p <0.001), jump (0 [0-0] vs 3 [0-

8]; p = 0.010), and flexion deficiency (3 [0-3] vs 3 [ 0 -5]; p = 0.021).

Conclusion: We found that non-resurfacing patellar TKR was associated with

AKP. But there was no difference in pain scale between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing

patella groups Moreover, there were significant differences of both

Kujala Score and Knee Society Score in both groups."