Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tujuan: Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efek stimulasi dengan metode kartu baca cepat Glenn Doman terhadap tajam penglihatan. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah uji klinis acak, tersamar tunggal. Sebanyak 36 anak usia 12-15 bulan yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dibagi menjadi dua kelompok yang masing-masing terdiri dari 18 anak. Kelompok pertama mendapatkan stimulasi dengan kartu baca cepat Glenn Doman selama tiga bulan sedangkan kelompok kedua tidak mendapatkan stimulasi. Setiap bulan dilakukan pemeriksaan tajam penglihatan monokular dan binokular. Keluaran sekunder menilai hubungan antara perubahan tajam penglihatan terhadap peningkatan nilai kognitif. Hasil: Sebanyak 36 anak mengikuti penelitian selama 3 bulan. Rerata tajam penglihatan akhir mata kanan pada kelompok uji dan kelompok kontrol meningkat namun tidak berbeda bermakna (log MAR 0,31 vs 0,33; p=0,55). Peningkatan rerata tajam penglihatan akhir juga terdapat pada mata kiri (log MAR 0,31 vs 0,32; p=0,55). Rerata tajam penglihatan binokular mengalami peningkatan namun tidak berbeda bermakna (log MAR 0,31 vs 0,33; p 0,31). Peningkatan tajam penglihatan terbesar terdapat di bulan pertama pada kedua kelompok ( OD log MAR 0,38 vs 0,42; OS log MAR 0,44 vs 0,44; OU 0,27 vs 0,36) namun peningkatan tersebut tidak berbeda bermakna (p>0,05). Hubungan antara perubahan tajam penglihatan dan perubahan nilai kognitif tidak berbeda bermakna antara kelompok uji dengan kelompok kontrol (p>0,05). Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan tajam penglihatan yang bermakna antara kelompok dengan stimulasi menggunakan metode Glenn Doman dengan kelompok tanpa stimulasi.

---

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of stimulation with Glenn Doman flash cards method in visual acuity.

Method: This was randomized single-blind controlled trial study. Thirty-six children age 12-15 months were participated in the study and were divided into two group consisted of eighteen children in each group. The intervention group had stimulation using Glenn Doman flash cards methods while control group had not given stimulation. Stimulation was continuosly held for three consecutive months. The visual acuity between two groups were compared. Secondary outcome was correlation between visual acuity changes and changes in cognitive score of Bayley Score Infant Development (BSID) in both groups.

Result: Thirty six children were participating in the study for three months. There was improvement in mean visual acuity of the right eye in both groups (log MAR 0,31 vs. 0,32; p=0,55) as well as the left eye on both groups but not statistically significant (log MAR 0,31 vs. 0,32; p=0,55). Mean binocular visual acuity in both groups was improved but not statistically significant (log MAR 0,31 vs. 0,33; p=0,31). Largest increase of visual acuity in both groups were in the first month (OD log MAR 0,38 vs. 0,42; OS log MAR 0,44 vs. 0,44; binocular log MAR 0,27 vs. 0,36) but not statistically significant (p>0,05). There was no statistically significant correlation between visual acuity changes and BSID cognitive score changes.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity between intervention group and control group."

"ABSTRAKPerkembangan anak merupakan sesuatu yang bersifat multidimensi dan terdiri atas area kognitif, bahasa, fungsi gerak, sosial emosional danperilaku adaptif, masing-masing memiliki nilai tersendiri namun salingberintegrasi. Dua metode stimulasi (Glenn Doman (GD) dan Kemenkes (K))dinilai kualitasnya dalam penelitian ini.Tujuan.Mengetahui pengaruh perbedaan stimulasi metode GD dan K terhadapskor perkembangan bayi usia 6-12 bulan.Metode.Penelitian kohort prospektif pada bayi normal.Skrining perkembanganawal dilakukan menggunakan alat ukur Denver.Pasca 3 bulan intervensi,perkembangan bayi dinilai menggunakan BSID edisi-III yang terlebih dahuludilakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas.Kualitas stimulasi rumah di nilaimenggunakan alat ukur HOME.Hasil.Skor validitas dari BSID edisi-III adalah 0,964 (kognitif), 0,934 (bahasa),0,822 (gerak) dengan Cronbach Alpha sebesar 0,918 serta reliabilitas test-retest0,846. Subjek yang memenuhi kriteria sebanyak 88 orang, dengan jenis kelaminlaki-laki (61,4%), usia 9-12 bulan (68,2%), status gizi baik (75%). Perbedaanbermakna terdapat pada skor HOME dan semua aspek penilaian perkembanganBSID di kedua grup setelah masa intervensi 3 bulan (p<0,001). Skor grup GDlebih unggul 1 angka dibandingkan K pada skor HOME (p=0,024) and 32 angkalebih unggul pada skor BSID (p=0,002). Faktor jumlah anak bermakna secarastatistik memengaruhi perkembangan dengan risiko relative 3.13 (IK 95% 1.18-8.33, p=0,022).Simpulan.Instrumen BSID edisi-III versi Bahasa Indonesia merupakan alat ukuryang sahih dan andal untuk digunakan pada penelitian ini. Secara umum tidakterdapat perbedaan skor perkembangan bayi usia 6-12 bulan yang mendapatstimulasi metode GD dan K kecuali perkembangan perilaku adaptif.

---

ABSTRACTChild development is multi-dimensional and encompasses cognitive, language, sensory-motor, social-emotional, adaptive behavior domains, all ofwhich are interdependent. Two stimulation interventions (Glenn Doman (GD) andKemenkes (K) methods) were conducted in this study.Aims.To investigate the difference in developmental aspects after interventionwith GD and K methods in infants age 6-12 months.Methods. This was a prospective cohort study in normal developmental infants.Developmental screening at enrollment used Denver instrument. Three monthspost intervention, the development was assessed with BSID III, in whichvalidation and reliability test were undertaken as first step. A modified version ofHOME inventory was used as edition to assess home environment.Results.The validity score of BSID-III was 0.964 (cognitive), 0.934 (language),0.822 (motor) with Cronbach alpha of 0.918 and a reliability test-retest of 0.846.There were 88 subjects fulfilled the criteria. Subject mostly were male (61.4%) 9-12 months old (68.2%), normal anthropometric status (75%). The results revealedsignificant differences in HOME score and all aspects of Bayley score in GD andK group after 3 months intervention period (p<0.001). The GD benefited 1 pointcompared with K group in HOME score (p=0.024) and 32 points in Bayley score(p=0.002). Number of children was the most influential factor in infants’development with a relative risk of 3.13 (CI95% 1.18-8.33, p=0.022).Conclusions.The Bahasa Indonesia version of BSID-III was a reliable and validtool for the assessment of this study. There was no difference in developmentalscore at age 6-12 months who had GD and K stimulation methods except foradaptive behavior scale."