Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
"Economic crime is a significant feature of the UK's economic landscape and yet despite the government's bold mission statements 'to hold those suspected of financial wrongdoing to account' as part of their 'day of reckoning' and 'serious about white-collar crime' agenda, there is a sense that this is still not being done effectively. This book examines the history of the creation of the UK's anti-economic crime institutions and accompanying legislation, providing a critique of their effectiveness. The book analyses whether the recent regulatory regime is fit for purpose as well as being appropriate for the future. In order to explore how the UK's economic crime strategies could be improved the book takes a comparative approach analysing policy and legislative responses to economic crime in the United States and Australia in order to determine whether the UK could or should import similar structures or laws to improve the enforcement of UK economic crime."--Provided by publisher.

Abstrak :
Terrorism experts continue to debate how and why people become radicalised and commit violence. Significantly less emphasis and coherence of thought has been deployed to understand those processes in reverse. From the perspective of counterterrorism practitioners within both government and civil society, the question has tended to bifurcate around two contrasting conceptual approaches: should the focus be on ‘deradicalization’ (an internal or philosophical outcome seeking change in beliefs, values and attitudes) or ‘disengagement’ (a social or temporal outcome seeking change in behaviours away from violence)? This article seeks to contribute to the debate about how disengagement functions and stands as a practical and effective counterterrorism methodology, and is based on detailed analysis of field work and project implementation in Indonesia. This article and the methodologies implemented and tested are grounded in previous research on disengagement of Indonesian jihadists and countering violent extremism (CVE) projects conducted by several of the authors over many years, and extends and codifies the findings of a valuable body of earlier academic literature. The authors argue that a disengagement process grounded in the social methodology of personal mentoring (defined infra this paper by a process we have called ‘Hearts, Hands and Heads’) can achieve a measurable and meaningful change in how individuals withdraw from violent extremist networks. This article will further show why disengagement programs in Indonesia should prioritise targeting specific at-risk groups, including returned foreign fighters, who have been known to conduct terrorist activities in Indonesia as well as advocate for their cause and recruit more effectively than those that have never been to Syria or other conflict zones. With the proper implementation, disengagement can be an effective preventive tool in Indonesia in addition to preparing the groundwork for later, more formal deradicalization processes and programs.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Pasca terjadinya serangan 9/11, angka serangan teror yang berasal dari kelompok teroris transnasional mengalami peningkatan. Menurut data Europol dari tahun 2006- 2012, Inggris, Spanyol dan Perancis mengalami serangan teror yang lebih dominan jika dibandingkan dengan negara Uni Eropa yang lainnya. Namun dari data tersebut, Inggris merupakan negara dengan angka rata-rata serangan teror terendah. Tesis ini membandingkan upaya Inggris, Spanyol dan Perancis dalam menanggulangi ancaman terorisme menggunakan kerangka analisa strategi penggentaran. Data mengenai penanggulangan terorisme di ketiga negara dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan tiga elemen strategi penggentaran, yaitu penggentaran dengan hukuman, penggentaran dengan penangkalan, dan penggentaran dengan insentif. Berdasarkan data dari penelitian ini, disimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan Inggris terletak pada kemampuan pemerintahnya dalam mengkombinasikan pendekatan keras (hard approach) dan pendekatan lunak (soft approach) serta meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat yang tidak terdapat pada penanggulangan terorisme Spanyol dan Perancis. Selain itu, keberhasilan Inggris juga didukung oleh mekanisme kontrol imigrasi yang dipegang sepenuhnya oleh Pemerintah Inggris.

---

ABSTRACT
After the event of 9/11, the number of attacks from transnasional terrorist group has been significantly increasing. According to The Europol’s data from 2006 to 2012, United Kingdom, Spain and France encountered more dominant terror attacks compared to other countries including those in European Union . However, the data shows that, UK had the lowest number of terror attack from three countries. This thesis compares the efforts of UK, Spain and France in tackling the threat of terrorism using deterrence strategy framework. Data concerning counter terrorism in three countries was analyzed using qualitative method with three elements of deterrence strategy namely deterrence by punishment, deterrence by denial, and deterrence by incentive. Based on the result of the research, UK’s success due to its government’s capability to combining hard and soft approach and as well as to increase society’s active participation in implementing counter terrorism’s policy. Moreover, UK’s success was also supported by immigration control mechanism that was fully handled by British Goverment.

Abstrak :
Pencegahan penyalahgunaan Teknologi Finansial atau Fintech sebagai media pencucian uang dan pendanaan terorisme memerlukan pendekatan pencegahan kejahatan multi-agen untuk mendapatkan solusi yang lebih komprehensif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa bagaimana aktor yang terlibat dalam penerapan rezim internasional Anti Pencucian Uang dan Pencegahan Pendanaan Terorisme (APUPPT), khususnya Komite TPPU sebagai badan koordinasi nasional untuk mengantisipasi kedua jenis kejahatan tersebut, berupaya untuk menerapkan kebijakan APUPPT bagi industri Fintech. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang data primernya didapatkan melalui wawancara tidak terstruktur dengan PPATK, Dittipideksus Bareskrim Polri, Espay, dan NCB-INTERPOL Indonesia. Teori yang digunakan adalah space-transition theory, rational choice theory, teori pencegahan kejahatan multi-agen dan teori kemitraan. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa untuk mencapai kerja sama yang maksimal dalam mencegah penyalahgunaan Fintech sebagai media pencucian uang dan pendanaan terorisme perlu menggunakan prinsip kemitraan. Konsep kemitraan pada penelitian ini ditekankan pada hubungan kerja sama publik-swasta yang terbangun antara Asosiasi Fintech Indonesia (Aftech) dengan regulator.

---

Preventing the abuse of Financial Technology (Fintech) as a media of money laundering and terrorism financing needs an approach of multi-agent crime prevention for a more comprehensive solution. The purpose of this research is to analyze the efforts of the actors involved in the implementation of the Anti Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML-CFT) international regime, particularly the National Coordination Committee of Prevention and Eradication of the Criminal Act of Money Laundering as the national coordination body to anticipate these two criminal acts, in implementing a policy on AML-CFT for Fintech industries. This research is conducted in qualitative approach with primary data gathered from unstructured interview(s) with Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (INTRAC/PPATK); Directorate of Financial Crime, Criminal Investigation Department of Indonesian National Police; Espay; and NCB-INTERPOL Indonesia. The theories used in this research are space-transtition theory, rational choice theory, multi-agency crime prevention theory, and theory of partnership. The outcome of this research suggests that a principle of partnership is needed to achieve a full cooperation in preventing the abuse of Fintech as a media of money laundering and terrorism financing by all the actors involved. The concept of partnership in this research is emphasized on public-private cooperation between Indonesian Association of Fintech (Aftech) and regulators.