Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Pengembangan humanisme sebagai inti profesionalisme diperlukan karena dokter profesional masa kini dituntut melakukan pelayanan berpusat pada pasien dan mengesampingkan kepentingan pribadi. Pengembangan humanisme dipengaruhi persepsi mahasiswa terhadap lingkungan pembelajaran terutama di klinik. Meskipun demikian, belum ada instrumen untuk menilai hal tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menyusun instrumen penilaian iklim humanis lingkungan pembelajaran klinis. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain sequential exploratory mixed method dan dilakukan di Rumah Sakit dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM) pada bulan Januari – Desember 2019. Penelitian dilakukan dalam empat tahap yaitu penyusunan instrumen, uji coba, penyusunan model iklim humanis lingkungan pembelajaran klinis dan implementasi. Tahapan penyusunan instrumen dimulai dengan sintesis konsep iklim humanis lingkungan pembelajaran klinis melalui telaah pustaka, focus group discussion dan wawancara mendalam. Dari penyusunan tersebut diperoleh konsep yang dijadikan rujukan draf instrumen Humanistic Climate Measure (H-CliM) yang terdiri atas 89 butir pertanyaan; 7 domain. Tahap kedua, dilakukan uji coba H-CliM bersama instrumen untuk menilai kompetensi humanisme Integrity Compassion Altruism Respect Empathy (ICARE). Kedua instrumen terbukti valid (r > 0,3) dan reliabel (α-cronbach > 0,7). Dilakukan analisis faktor untuk memvalidasi konstruk dan menghasilkan instrumen H-CliM final (46 butir pertanyaan; 4 domain) serta ICARE final (15 butir pertanyaan; 2 domain). Analisis receiver operating characteristic (ROC) menghasilkan titik potong ≥ 184,5 artinya, skor H-CliM ≥ 184,5 tergolong humanis. Analisis regresi logistik menghasilkan model iklim humanis yang 62% dapat menjelaskan variasi iklim humanis (R2 = 0,62). Model tersebut adalah: Logit P (iklim humanis) = 0,782 (rotasi klinis non-bedah) + 0,048 (kurikulum formal dan informal terkait humanisme) – 0,213 (hidden curriculum) + 0,036 (relasi dan fasilitas yang mendukung humanisme) + 0,044 (pengembangan kepribadian dan profesionalisme) + 0,409 (perempuan) + e. Penelitian ini berhasil mengembangkan instrumen penilaian iklim humanis yang valid dan reliabel yaitu instrumen H-CliM (α-Cronbach = 0,86). Lingkungan pembelajaran non-bedah 2 kali lebih humanis dibanding bedah (p = 0,0001). Persepsi terhadap iklim humanis lingkungan pembelajaran klinis berkorelasi lemah dengan capaian kompetensi humanisme. ......The development of humanism as the core of professionalism is crucial, seeing that professional doctors today are expected to carry through patient-centered services and put aside their personal interests. In clinical setting, cultivating humanism is highly influenced by students 'perceptions on clinical learning climate, therefore, it is necessary to assess that perception. However, to date there is no instrument to assess clinical learning climate. The purpose of this study is to develop an instrument to assess humanistic learning climate. This study utilizes a sequential exploratory mixed method design and is conducted at the Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital (RSCM) in January - December 2019. The research was conducted in four stages, which are the preparation of instruments, trials, development of humanistic climate models of clinical learning environments and implementation of the instrument. The stages of instrument preparation begin with the synthesis of concept of the humanistic clinical learning climate through literature review, focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Afterward, the concept that was obtained utilized as a reference for drafting instrument of Humanistic Climate Measure (H-CliM) consisting of 89 questions; 7 domains. The second stage, an H-CliM trial was carried out along with instruments to assess the competence of the Integrity Compassion Altruism Respect Empathy (ICARE). Both instruments proved to be valid (r > 0.3) and reliable (α-Cronbach > 0.7). Factor analysis was carried out to validate the construct and produce the final H-CliM instrument (46 questions; 4 domains) and the final ICARE (15 questions; 2 domains). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis resulted in cut-off point of 184.5, which means that the H-CliM score ≥ 184.5 was classified as humanistic climate. Humanistic climate models obtained from the logistic regression analysis could explain 62% of variation of humanistic climate (R2= 0,62). The model is: Logit P (humanistic climate) = 0.782 (non-surgical clinical rotation) + 0.048 (formal and informal curriculum related to humanism) - 0.213 (hidden curriculum) + 0.036 (relationship and facilities that support humanism) + 0.044 (personality development and professionalism) + 0,409 (female) + e. This research succeeded in developing a valid and reliable humanistic climate assessment instrument, the H-CliM instrument (α-Cronbach = 0,86). Compare with surgical rotation, the non-surgical learning environment is twice more humanistic (p = 0.0001). Perceptions of the humanistic climate of the clinical learning environment are weakly correlated with the achievement of humanism competencies.

Abstrak :
Vocational education has some characteristics that might be different from other formal schools such as ; education purpose, learning substance , education demand and output.

Abstrak :
Pendahuluan: Pembelajaran klinik pada pendidikan kedokteran harus mengalami perubahan yang drastis akibat terjadinya pandemi COVID-19, yaitu transisi dari sistem pendidikan tradisional menuju ke sistem daring yang mengakibatkan hilangnya dan berkurangnya pengalaman keterampilan klinis yang diperoleh mahasiswa. Transisi yang tiba-tiba mengakibatkan mahasiswa harus beradaptasi secara cepat tanpa tersedianya panduan dan sumber daya yang memadai. Proses adaptasi ini menjadi tantangan tersendiri dan memegang peran penting dalam keberhasilan pendidikan klinis. Tujuan: Mengeksplorasi adaptasi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran bauran pada pendidikan kedokteran tahap klinis di masa pandemi COVID-19. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain studi kualitatif fenomenologi. Data dikumpulkan melalui focus group discussion (FGD) dengan 33 mahasiswa yang terbagi dalam empat sesi. Data diolah dengan metode analisis tematik. Untuk memastikan trustworthiness dilakukan triangulasi peneliti dan member checking. Analisis dilakukan berdasarkan tema yang muncul. Hasil: Terdapat 9 tema dalam 3 kategori. Kategori pertama yakni perubahan yang terjadi pada pembelajaran klinis di masa pandemi yang terdiri dari perasaan mahasiswa, perubahan pada sistem pembelajaran klinis dan kendala yang ditemui. Kategori kedua adalah persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran bauran pada pendidikan klinis di masa pandemi COVID-19 yang terdiri dari keunggulan dan kekurangan dari pembelajaran bauran. Kategori ketiga yaitu adalah adaptasi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran bauran di masa pandemi COVID-19 yang terdiri dari tema adaptasi mahasiswa terhadap kondisi pandemi dan adaptasi mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran bauran. Kesimpulan: Mahasiswa melakukan upaya penyesuaian diri baik terhadap kondisi pandemi dan terhadap pembelajaran bauran. Mahasiswa memiliki persepsi dari keunggulan dan kekurangan pembelajaran bauran. Terdapat faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi keberhasilannya dalam pembelajaran bauran ynag terdiri dari faktor internal dan eksternal. ......Introduction: Clinical teaching in medical education experienced drastic changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Without any available guideline and appropriate sources, the adaptation process become challenge for students and it is crucial to determine the success in clinical education. Purpose: To explore student adaptation in blended learning in clinical stage medical education during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study used qualitative phenomenology design. Data was collected through focus group discussions (FGD) with 33 students divided into 4 sessions. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis methods. Triangulation and member checking were used to ensure trustworthiness. Results: There are 9 themes in 3 categories found in the study. First category is changes in clinical learning during pandemic which consist of changes in education system, student's emotional reactions and obstacles. Second category is medical student perception about blended learning during pandemic consist of benefits and burdens. Third category is student adaptation consist of student adaptation towards pandemic situation, adaptation towards blended learning, factors influencing and student expectations. Conclusion: Students made efforts to adapt both toward pandemic conditions and blended learning. Students identified benefits and burdens using blended learning model. Some factors influence their success in blended learning which consists of internal and external factors.