Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Ilmu pragmatik sebagai bagian dari ilmu linguistik mulai berkembang di Indonesia pada awal tahun 70-an. Walaupun sudah berjalan sekitar 20 tahun belum banyak orang yang menulis maupun yang membuat penelitian mengenai pragmatik. Saya mencoba membuat penelitian mengenai konvensi pragmatik sekelompok penutur bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Jerman. Masalah-masalah yang dibahas dalam tesis ini terdiri atas: bentuk-bentuk pragmatik bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Jerman; persamaan dan perbedaan bentuk-bentuk pragmatik bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Jerman; dan faktor-faktor pragmatik yang harus ditekankan dalam pengajaran bahasa Jerman di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah; agar diperoleh bentuk-bentuk pragmatik bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Jerman; persamaan dan perbedaan bentuk-bentuk pragmatik bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Jarman; juga agar diperoleh hal-hal yang harus ditekankan dalam pengajaran bahasa Jerman di Indonesia. Hasil analisis menunjukkan faktor-faktor yang harus ditekankan dalam pengajaran bahasa Jerman ialah pengungkapan makna-makna yang berlainan caranya dalam bahasa Jerman dan dalam bahasa Indonesia, antara lain, pemakaian kata Herr... tidak bisa berdiri sendiri, tidak bisa dikombinasikan dengan nama depan atau nama panggilan, tetapi dikombinasikan dengan nama keluarga. Dalam bentuk sopan santun dipakai bentuk pengandaian Konnten Sie...? serta klausa pengandaian "Es ware nett, ...." Pemakaian partikel vielleicht; mal; doch besar pengaruhnya dalam kalimat sopan santun. Juga bentuk es dan man yang tidak terdapat dalam bahasa Indonesia perlu ditekankan oleh pengajar bahasa Jerman.

---

Pragmatics is a discipline that has been developed since in the early 1970s. Although it has been over 20 year now, not many people have written nor showed an interest in this area. This Thesis is an attempt to study the pragmatic convention of a group of speakers both in the Indonesian and German language. The problems discussed in this thesis are as follows: the differences and similarities of pragmatic forms in both Indonesian and German; and pragmatic factors that should be emphasized in the teaching of Indonesian and German. The purpose of this study is to obtain the pragmatic forms in Indonesia, the similarities and differences in pragmatic form in both Indonesian and German; and to find the factors that should be emphasized in teaching of German-in Indonesia The finding in this analysis shows that the factors that should be emphasized in the teaching of German the differences in the expression of meanings in Indonesian and German, for example, the word `Herr' which cannot occur in isolation, and cannot be use with forenames or nicknames, but it should occur with Emily names. The polite form in German uses the conditional forms `Konnten Sle.... ?' and the conditional clause `Es ware nett '. The Use of the particles `vielleicht, mil, dock' has a great effect the polite forms. Also the forms `es' and `man' that do not exist in Indonesian should be emphasized by the teacher of German.

Abstrak :
"Pragmatics is the study of human communication: the choices speakers make to express their intended meaning and the kinds of inferences that hearers draw from an utterance in the context of its use. This Handbook surveys pragmatics from different perspectives, presenting the main theories in pragmatic research, incorporating seminal research as well as cutting-edge solutions. It addresses questions of rational and empirical research methods, what counts as an adequate and successful pragmatic theory, and how to go about answering problems raised in pragmatic theory. In the fast-developing field of pragmatics, this Handbook fills the gap in the market for a one-stop resource to the wide scope of today's research and the intricacy of the many theoretical debates. It is an authoritative guide for graduate students and researchers with its focus on the areas and theories that will mark progress in pragmatic research in the future"--

Abstrak :
Pragmatics is the study of human communication: the choices speakers make to express their intended meaning and the kinds of inferences that hearers draw from an utterance in the context of its use. This Handbook surveys pragmatics from different perspectives, presenting the main theories in pragmatic research, incorporating seminal research as well as cutting-edge solutions. It addresses questions of rational and empirical research methods, what counts as an adequate and successful pragmatic theory, and how to go about answering problems raised in pragmatic theory. In the fast-developing field of pragmatics, this Handbook fills the gap in the market for a one-stop resource to the wide scope of today's research and the intricacy of the many theoretical debates.

Abstrak :
"Pragmatics is the study of human communication: the choices speakers make to express their intended meaning and the kinds of inferences that hearers draw from an utterance in the context of its use. This Handbook surveys pragmatics from different perspectives, presenting the main theories in pragmatic research, incorporating seminal research as well as cutting-edge solutions. It addresses questions of rational and empirical research methods, what counts as an adequate and successful pragmatic theory, and how to go about answering problems raised in pragmatic theory. In the fast-developing field of pragmatics, this Handbook fills the gap in the market for a one-stop resource to the wide scope of today's research and the intricacy of the many theoretical debates. It is an authoritative guide for graduate students and researchers with its focus on the areas and theories that will mark progress in pragmatic research in the future"-- Provided by publisher. "Pragmatics is the study of human communication: the choices speakers make to express their intended meaning and the kinds of inferences that hearers draw from an utterance in the context of its use. This Handbook surveys pragmatics from different erspectives, presenting the main theories in pragmatic research, incorporating seminal research as well as cutting-edge solutions. It addresses questions of rational and empirical research methods, what counts as an adequate and successful pragmatic theory, and how to go about answering problems raised in pragmatic theory. In the fast-developing field of pragmatics, this Handbook fills the gap in themarket for a one-stop resource to the wide scope of today's research and the intricacy of the many theoretical debates. It is an authoritative guide for graduate students and researchers with its focus on the areas and theories that will mark progress in pragmatic research in the future"-- Provided by publisher. Contents Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction: pragmatic objects and pragmatic methods Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Keith Allan; Part I. Problems and Theories: 2. Research paradigms in pragmatics Mira Ariel; 3. Saying, meaning, and implicating Kent Bach; 4. Implying and inferring Laurence R. Horn; 5. Speaker intentions and intentionality Michael Haugh and Kasia M. Jaszczolt; 6. Context and content: pragmatics in two-dimensional semantics Berit Brogaard; 7. Contextualism: some varieties François Recanati; 8. The psychology of utterance processing: context vs. salience Rachel Giora; 9. Sentences, utterances, and speech acts Mikhail Kissine; 10. Pragmatics in update semantics Henk Zeevat; 11. The normative dimension of discourse Jaroslav Peregrin; 12. Pragmatics in the (English) lexicon Keith Allan; 13. Conversational interaction Michael Haugh; 14. Empirical investigations and pragmatic theorising Napoleon Katsos; Part II. Phenomena and Applications: 15. Referring in discourse Arthur Sullivan; 16. Propositional attitude reports: pragmatic aspects Kasia M. Jaszczolt; 17. Presupposition and accommodation in discourse Rob van der Sandt; 18. Negation Jay David Atlas; 19. Connectives Caterina Mauri and Johan van der Auwera; 20. Spatial reference in discourse Luna Filipović; 21. Temporal reference in discourse Louis de Saussure; 22. Textual coherence as a pragmatic phenomenon Anita Fetzer; 23. Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction Robyn Carston; Part III. Interfaces and the Delimitation of Pragmatics: 24. Pragmatics in the history of linguistic thought Andreas H. Jucker; 25. Semantics without pragmatics? Emma Borg; 26. The syntax/pragmatics interface Ruth Kempson; 27. Pragmatics and language change Elizabeth Closs Traugott; 28. Pragmatics and prosody Tim Wharton; 29. Pragmatics and information structure Jeanette K. Gundel; 30. Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies Istvan Kecskes; 31. Politeness and pragmatics Marina Terkourafi.

Abstrak :
In paramagmatic research one of the data collection instrument whichreleability is being questioned about its realibility is the Discourse Completion Test (DCT)....

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Dampak Penggunaan Strategi Penerjemahan pada Kesepadanan Pragmatis dalam Subtitle Film Jumanji.Tesis ini membahas dampak penggunaan strategi penerjemahan pada subtitle dalam film Jumanji. Dampak itu dilihat melalui kesepadanan pragmatis antara subtitle dan situasi adegan film. Penelitian ini berancangan kualitatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah replik dialog, subtitle, dan gambar situasi adegan film Jumanji yang mengandung tindak tutur direktif perintah dan larangan. Langkah awal penelitian ini adalah penjabaran situasi adegan dari replik dialog dan subtitle yang mengandung tindak tutur direktif perintah dan larangan. Langkah berikutnya adalah menganalisis strategi penerjemahan yang digunakan penerjemah dalam menerjemahkan replik dialog pada subtitle. Kemudian, menganalisis fungsi tuturan penutur dan tanggapan mitra tutur dalam peristiwa tutur yang terjadi dalam situasi adegan untuk menjabarkan tindak tutur direktif perintah dan larangan. Langkah terakhir adalah menganalisis koherensi antara subtitle dan situasi adegan dari data terpilih. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa sepuluh data dinyatakan tidak berhasil, lima data dinyatakan kurang berhasil, dan tujuh data dinyatakan sudah berhasil mencapai kesepadanan pragmatis. Dengan begitu, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kesepadanan pragmatis merupakan tujuan dari penerjemahan dalam film. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penggunaan strategi penerjemahan merupakan faktor penting dalam mencapai kesepadanan pragmatis dalam film.

---

ABSTRACT
The impact can be seen through pragmatic equivalence between subtitle and ongoing situation scene. This research is a qualitative research that uses descriptive analysis method. The source of this research is taken from replica dialog, subtitle, and ongoing situation picture that are containing directive speech acts of command and prohibition. First step to do in this research is describing ongoing situation when speaker and co speaker are doing conversation. Then researcher analyzes translation strategy that translator used to translate the directive speech acts into subtitle. Then researcher also analyzes speaker rsquo s speech and co speaker rsquo s reaction to the directive speech to describe the speech acts function in ongoing situation scene. For the last step, researcher analyzes coherency between subtitle and ongoing situation scene. By this research, researcher finds that ten data are declared unsuccessful, five data are expressed less successful, and seven data are successful to achieve pragmatic equivalence. So that, this research shows that the pragmatic equivalence can impact the quality of subtitle. Besides, researcher also finds that the aim of making subtitle in film translation is to be accurate and natural to the ongoing situation scene.