Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Any events presumed to risk the safety of a nuclear reactor should be analyzed. In a research reactor, the applicability of best estimate thermal-hydraulic codes has been assessed for safety analysis purposes. In this paper, the applicability of the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 thermal-hydraulic code to one Indonesian research reactor, which is named TRIGA-2000, is performed. The aim is to validate the model and use the model to analyze the thermal-hydraulic characteristics of TRIGA-2000 for main transient events considered in the Safety Analysis Report. The validation was done by comparing the calculation results with experimental data mainly in steady state conditions. The comparison of calculation results with the measurement data showed good agreement with little discrepancies. Based on these results, simulations for thermal-hydraulic analyses were performed for loss of coolant transients. The calculation results also properly depicted the physic of the thermal-hydraulic phenomena following the loss of coolant transients. These results showed the adequacy of the model. It could be shown that the engineered safety features of TRIGA-2000 play an important role in keeping the reactor safe from the risk of postulated loss of a coolant accident.

Abstrak :
The validation of Pressurized Water Reactor typed Nuclear Power Plant simulator developed by BATAN (SIMBAT-PWR) using standard code of COBRA-EN on reactor transient condition has been done. The development of SIMBAT-PWR has accomplished several neutronics and thermal-hydraulic calculation modules. Therefore, the validation of the simulator is needed, especially in transient reactor operation condition. The research purpose is for characterizing the thermal-hydraulic parameters of PWR1000 core, which is able to be applied or as a comparison in developing the SIMBAT- PWR. The validation involves the calculation of the thermal-hydraulic parameters using COBRA-EN code. Furthermore, the calculation schemes are based on COBRA-EN with fixed material properties and dynamic properties that are calculated by MATPRO sub routine (COBRA-EN+MATPRO) for reactor condition of startup, power rise and power fluctuation from nominal to over power. The comparison of the temperature distribution at nominal 100% power shows that the fuel centerline temperature calculated by SIMBAT-PWR has 8.76% higher than COBRA-EN and 7.70% lower than COBRA-EN+MATPRO. In general, SIMBAT- PWR calculation results on fuel temperature distribution are mostly between COBRA-EN and COBRA- EN+MATPRO results. The deviations of the fuel centerline, fuel surface, inner and outer cladding as well as coolant bulk temperature in the SIMBAT-PWR and the COBRA-EN calculation, are due to the difference of the gap between heat transfer coefficient and the cladding thermal conductivity.