Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Gangguan sendi temporomandibula dapat memengaruhi kualitas tidur. Penelitian mengenai hubungan gangguan sendi temporomandibula dan kualitas tidur pada perawat umum di rumah sakit dengan menggunakan kuesioner ID-TMD dan PSQI belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia. Tujuan: Menganalisis hubungan gangguan sendi temporomandibula dengan kualitas tidur, stres kerja, dan faktor sosiodemografis jenis kelamin, usia, status sosial ekonomi, tingkat pendidikan, dan status pernikahan pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Menganalisis hubungan kualitas tidur dengan stres kerja dan faktor sosiodemografis jenis kelamin, usia, status sosial ekonomi, tingkat pendidikan, dan status pernikahan pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Metode: Penelitian menggunakan desain cross sectional pada 92 subjek perawat di rumah sakit Hasanah Graha Afiah. Subjek mengisi tiga buah kuesioner yaitu; ID-TMD untuk mengukur gangguan sendi temporomandibula, PSQI versi bahasa Indonesia untuk mengukur kualitas tidur, dan ENSS versi bahasa Indonesia untuk mengukur stres kerja. Hasil Penelitian: Uji chi-square menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan bermakna p=0.02 antara gangguan sendi temporomandibula dengan kualitas tidur pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Uji Mann-Whitney dan Independen T-test menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna yang signifikan p>0.05 antara gangguan sendi temporomandibula dengan stres kerja pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Uji chi-square menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna p>0.05 antara gangguan sendi temporomandibula dengan faktor sosiodemografi jenis kelamin, tingkat pendidikan, status sosial ekonomi, status pernikahan pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Uji Indepeden T-test menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan bermakna p=0.035 antara kualitas tidur dengan komponen ENSS masalah dengan pasien dan keluarganya pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Uji chi-square menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna p>0.05 antara kualitas tidur dengan faktor sosiodemografi jenis kelamin, tingkat pendidikan, status sosial ekonomi, status pernikahan pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C. Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara gangguan sendi temporomandibula dengan kualitas tidur pada perawat umum di rumah sakit swasta tipe C.

---

Backgroud: Temporomandibular disorder can affect quality of sleep. The study analyzing the association between temporomandibular disorder and quality of sleep on nurses in type C private hospital using ID TMD and PSQI Indonesian version questionnaire has never been conducted in Indonesia.

Objectives: Analyzing the relationship between temporomandibular disorder with quality of sleep, work stress, and sociodemographic factors gender, age, sosial economic status, education level, and marital status on nurses in type C private hospital. Analyzing the relationship between quality of sleep with work stress and sociodemographic factors gender, age, sosial economic status, education level, and marital status on nurses in type C private hospital.

Methods: This cross sectional study assessed the data of 92 nurses in Hasanah Graha Afiah Hospital. Three questionnaires were given to each hospital nurse. The ID TMD questionnaire was used to evaluate temporomandibular disorder, the PSQI Indonesian version was used to evaluate quality of sleep, and the ENSS Indonesian version was used to evaluate work stress.

Results: Chi square test showed significant differences p 0.02 between temporomandibular disorder and quality of sleep on nurses in type C private hospital. Mann Whitney and Independent T test showed that there are no significant differences p 0.05 between temporomandibular disorder and work stress on nurses in type C private hospital. Chi square test showed that there are no significant differences p 0.05 between temporomandibular disorder and sociodemographic factors gender, age, sosial economic status, education level, and marital status on nurses in type C private hospital. Independent T test showed significant differences p 0.035 between quality of sleep and one of the ENSS component patients and their families on nurses in type C private hospital. Chi square test showed that there are no significant differences p 0.05 between quality of sleep and sociodemographic factors gender, age, sosial economic status, education level, and marital status on nurses in type C private hospital.

Conclusion: Temporomandibular disorder was associated with quality of sleep on nurses in type C private hospital. "

"Gangguan sendi temporomandibula (GSTM) adalah istilah untuk Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), yaitu kumpulan gangguan yang melibatkan sendi temporomandibula, otot, dan struktur di sekitarnya. Dokter gigi dan dokter gigi spesialis merasakan hambatan dalam menangani pasien GSTM. Saat ini belum diketahui bagaimana pengetahuan, sikap, dan perilaku dokter gigi dan dokter gigi spesialis di Indonesia dalam menangani pasien GSTM. Etiologi GSTM multifaktorial dan salah satu penanganannya adalah perawatan ortodonti. Namun di sisi lain perawatan ortodonti diduga menjadi salah satu penyebab GSTM akibar perubahan posisi gigi, mandibula, dan letak kondil. Hal ini dapat dilihat melalui kondisi klinis dan radiograf sefalometri. Gangguan sendi temporomandibula dapat menjadi suatu inflamasi sehingga biomarker inflamasi banyak diteliti. Tujuan: Penelitian ini terdiri dari dua tahap. Penelitian tahap I (Kualitatif) bertujuan mendapatkan alat ukur/kuesioner kemampuan operator (dokter gigi dan dokter gigi spesialis) tentang pengetahuan, sikap, dan perilaku terhadap pasien dengan GSTM, yang valid dan reliabel. Penelitian tahap II (Kuantitatif) bertujuan memperoleh indeks prediksi risiko GSTM berdasarkan kemampuan operator (skor kuesioner), kondisi klinis terkait faktor klinis (usia, jenis maloklusi, overjet, overbite, dan indeks etiologi GSTM), kondisi klinis terkait faktor mekanis (jenis bracket, kasus ekstraksi, dan alat tambahan), radiograf sefalometri (sudut ANB, SN-MP, Go Angle, I-I dan Y-Axis), dan biomarker inflasi (IL-1β dan CRP) Metode: Penelitian disetujui Komite Etik Kedokteran Gigi, FKG-UI, No: 11/Ethical Approval/FKGUI/III/2022 dan dilakukan di Klinik Ortodonti dan Laboratorium Biologi Oral, RSKGM, FKG UI, Jakarta, Indonesia, pada November 2021-Januari 2024. Penelitian tahap I, pembuatan kuesioner melalui telaah pustaka, observasi, dan diskusi kelompok terarah (FGD) oleh 10 orang dokter gigi dan dokter gigi spesialis. Hasil FGD dianalisis menggunakan metode Framework dilanjutkan uji face dan content validity menggunakan analisis Aiken’s V, I-CVI, dan I-CVR. Kuesioner juga dilakukan uji validitas (korelasi Spearman) dan uji reliabilitas (Cronbach’s Alpha dan CITC). Setiap tahap pengujian dilakukan diskusi dan revisi terkait substansi oleh pakar. Kuesioner akhir (Kuesioner PSP-GSTM) diujikan pada 370 responden dan PPDGS Ortodonti (operator) yang merawat subjek pada penelitian tahap II. Penelitian tahap II, dilakukan pada 105 subjek pasien pascaperawatan ortodonti yang dipanggil kembali untuk menandatangani informed consent, mengisi indeks etiologi GSTM, dilakukan pemeriksaan DC/ TMD, dan swab mukosa bukal. Data lainnya dilengkapi dari skor kuesioner, rekam medis, dan radiograf sefalometri. Dilakukan analisis bivariat untuk melihat hubungan setiap variabel dengan GSTM dan multivariat regresi logistik berganda. Hasil: Alat ukur/kuesioner PSPGSTM berisi 73 pernyataan, terdiri dari 50 pernyataan domain pengetahuan, 14 pernyataan domain sikap, dan sembilan pernyataan domain perilaku. Domain pengetahuan terdiri dari 12 pernyataan subdomain tanda dan gejala, 14 pernyataan subdomain etiologi, 11 pernyataan subdomain diagnosis, dan 13 pernyataan subdomain perawatan. Kuesioner PSP-GSTM memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik. Dihasilkan indeks prediksi risiko GSTM dengan empat faktor prediktor yaitu indeks etiologi GSTM, alat tambahan, SN-MP, dan Go Angle. Kesimpulan: Kemampuan dokter gigi dan dokter gigi spesialis terkait pengetahuan, sikap, dan perilaku terhadap pasien dengan GSTM dapat diukur menggunakan kuesioner PSP-GSTM. Indeks prediksi risiko GSTM yang terdiri dari indeks etiologi GSTM, alat tambahan, SN-MP, dan Go Angle dapat digunakan untuk memprediksi faktor risiko terjadinya GSTM.

---

The temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of disorders involving the temporomandibular joint, muscles, and surrounding structures. Dentists or dental specialists often encounter challenges when dealing with TMD patients. It is unknown how the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of dentists and dental specialists in Indonesia are in dealing with TMD patients. The etiology of TMD is multifactorial and one of the treatments is orthodontic treatment. On the other hand, orthodontic treatment is thought to be one of the causes of TMD due to changes in the position of the teeth, mandibles, and the location of the condyle. This can be seen through clinical conditions and cephalometric radiographs. Temporomandibular joint disorders can become inflammatory so inflammatory biomarkers are widely studied. Objective: The research consists of two stages. Phase I (Qualitative) aims to obtain a measurement/questionnaire of operator’s ability (dentists and dental specialists) about knowledge, attitudes, and behavior towards patients with TMD (PSP-TMD Questionnaire), which is valid and reliable. Phase II (Quantitative) aims to obtain TMD risk prediction index based on operator capability (PSP-TMD questionnaire score), clinical conditions related to clinical factors (age, malocclusion type, overjet, overbite, and TMD etiology index), clinical conditions related to mechanical factors (bracket type, extraction case, and auxiliary tools), cephalometric radiographs (ANB, SN-MP, Go Angle, I-I and Y-Axis angles), and biomarkers of inflammation (IL-1β and CRP) Method: The research was approved by the Dental Ethics Committee, FKG-UI, No: 11/Ethical Approval/FKGUI/III/2022 and conducted at the Orthodontics Clinic and Oral Biology Laboratory, RSKGM, FKG UI, Jakarta, Indonesia, in November 2021-January 2024. Phase I involves creating questionnaires through literature review, observation, and focus group discussion (FGD) by 10 dentists and dental specialists. The FGD results were analyzed using the Framework method followed by face and content validity tests using Aiken's V, I-CVI, and I-CVR analysis. Questionnaires were tested using validity tests (Spearman correlation) and reliability tests (Cronbach's Alpha and CITC). Every stage and testing related to the substance is discussed and revised by experts. The final questionnaire (PSPGSTM Questionnaire) was tested on 370 respondents and Orthodontics residents (operators) who treated subjects in phase II research. The phase II study was conducted on 105 subjects of orthodontic post-treatment patients who were called back to sign an informed consent and fill in the TMD etiology index, DC/TMD examination, and buccal mucosal swabs. Other data were supplemented from questionnaire scores, medical records, and cephalometric radiographs. Bivariate analysis was performed to see the relationship of each variable with TMD and multivariate multiple logistic regression. Results: The PSP-TMD measurement tool/questionnaire contained 73 statements, consisting of 50 knowledge domain statements, 14 attitude domain statements, and nine behavior domain statements. The knowledge domain consists of 12 sign and symptom subdomain statements, 14 etiology subdomain statements, 11 diagnosis subdomain statements, and 13 treatment subdomain statements. The PSP-TMD questionnaire has good validity and reliability. The TMD risk prediction index was generated with four predictor factors, namely the TMD etiology index, auxiliary tools, SN-MP, and Go Angle. Conclusion: The capability of dentists and dental specialists regarding knowledge, attitudes, and behavior towards patients with TMD can be measured using the PSP-TMD questionnaire. The TMD risk prediction index consisting of the TMD etiology index, auxiliary tools, SN-MP, and Go Angle can be used to predict risk factors for TMD"

"

---

ABSTRACTThe AAOP Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management of Orofacial Pain is an invaluable resource for all health care professionals who evaluate and treat patients with orofacial pain and face the daunting task of "keeping up with the literature" in the rapidly emerging arena of pain management in clinical practice. This new edition continues to emphasize evidence-based knowledge and, for the first time, offers a summary of key points at the beginning of each chapter. Other important changes include an entirely new chapter on sleep and its relationship to pain and well-being; new imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of headache, TMD, and neuropathic pain; a new section on dysesthesias related to neuropathic pain; comprehensive descriptions of SUNCT/SUNA in the chapter devoted to primary headache disorders; and recommendations for quantitative sensory testing, narcotic agreement, and brief screening questionnaires used in patient assessment. Most important, the differential diagnosis and TMD chapters reflect the recommendations of the long-awaited RDC/TMD taxonomy, which will have a significant impact on clinical practice. "