Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur efektivitas program pelatihan KASTURI (Sikap Positif Guru Inklusi) untuk meningkatkan sikap positif terhadap pendidikan inklusif pada guru Taman Tanak-Kanak (TK) inklusi. Desain penelitian ini adalah two-group pretest-posttest design. Partisipan dari penelitian ini adalah guru dari dua TK Negeri inklusi yang berbeda, yang dibagi menjadi kelompok kontrol (n=6) dan kelompok eksperimen (n=7). Pelatihan KASTURI berlangsung selama 5 hari dalam 1 sesi pembuka, 5 sesi materi, dan 1 sesi penutup. Topik yang dibahas dalam pelatihan in adalah konsep pendidikan inklusif, siswa berkebutuhan khusus, collaborative work, empati, dan Individualized Education Program (IEP). Untuk mengetahui efektivitas program pelatihan KASTURI, sikap guru diukur dengan menggunakan alat ukur the Multidimensional Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education Scale (MATIES) oleh Mahat (2008) dan diadaptasi untuk guru PAUD (Rizkiah & Kurniawati, 2019). Hasil analisis efek perbedaan skor pre-test dan post-test MATIES VI antara kelompok kontrol dan kelompok eksperimen menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,05) antara kedua kelompok di semua komponen sikap guru, yaitu kognitif (p=0,000), afektif (p=0,008), dan konatif atau perilaku (p=0,000). Terdapat peningkatan skor yang signifikan pada kelompok eksperimen sesudah diberikan pelatihan pada komponen sikap kognitif (Mean Difference/MD=6,286; p<0,05), sikap afektif (MD=9,143; p<0,05) dan sikap konatif (MD=4,714; p<0,05). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa program pelatihan KASTURI efektif untuk meningkatkan sikap positif guru TK terhadap pendidikan inklusif. Implikasi dari temuan ini dibahas dalam kaitannya dengan hasil penelitian- penelitian lain yang relevan dan saran bagi intervensi untuk guru TK inklusi di Indonesia. ......This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the KASTURI (Positive Attitude of Inclusive Teachers) training program for inclusive kindergarten teachers. The study used a two-group pretest-posttest design. The participants were teachers from two different inclusive public kindergartens, divided into a control group (n = 6) and an experiment group (n = 7). The KASTURI training lasted for 5 days, which consisted of 1 opening session, 5 training sessions, and 1 closing session. Topics delivered in the training were related to the concept of inclusive education, students with special needs, collaborative work, empathy, and Individualized Education Programs (IEP). Teachers’ attitudes were measured by Multidimensional Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education Scale (MATIES) by Mahat (2008), adapted for preschool teachers (Rizkiah & Kurniawati, 2019). Analysis on pre-test and post- test scores of MATIES VI between study groups showed significant difference (p <0.05) between the two in all three components of teacher’s attitudes, namely cognitive (p = 0.000), affective (p = 0.008), and conative or behavioral component (p = 0.000). Experiment group’s attitude scores increased significantly in the cognitive (Mean Difference / MD = 6.286; p <0.05), affective (MD = 9.143; p <0.05) and conative component ( MD = 4.714; p <0.05). These findings show that the KASTURI training program is effective in enhancing inclusive kindergarten teachers’ positive attitude towards inclusive education. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation with other relevant studies and intervention suggestions for inclusive kindergarten teachers in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
It is the continuous reports of unethical behavior in the form of data manipulation, cheating, plagiarism, and other forms of unacceptable behavior that draw attention to the issues of misconduct. The causes of misconduct are manifold whether it is the need to advance in a chosen discipline or to compete successfully for and obtain research funding. Disappointingly, individuals who are oriented to any form of dishonesty are individuals who had previously displayed little or no consideration for the feelings of others and are therefore more interested in themselves, at the expense of the students, and others recognizing them by any means necessary. This ground-breaking and honest examination of ethics in the university setting is unabashed in its descriptions of misconduct in the academic world. The text is well furbished with numerous citations that point to academic misconduct and the final chapter deals with the means by which misconduct can be mitigated, a strong reminder to everyone in the academic community that above board conduct must be part of our overall message of learning and part of the whole point of education in the first place. A must-have for academics and non-academics alike, this text is the second in a series of books on ethics by James G. Speight, and it is useful to anyone, in any industry, who is interested in ethical behavior and how to navigate the sometimes murky depths of our professional lives.