Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi, faktor yang mempengaruhi, dan strategi penguatan implementasi UU ASN di Provinsi Banten. Paradigma penelitian berupa post-positivisme dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi dokumen. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman terdiri dari reduksi data, display data, dan penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi serta menerapkan teknik triangulasi untuk mengetahui keabsahan data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga hal utama. Pertama, implementasinya bersifat prosedural dan formalitas, sehingga menimbulkan dampak negatif seperti terjadinya kekosongan formasi tertentu, terhambatnya peningkatan kapasitas pegawai, rendahnya kinerja pegawai, dan belum terjaminnya pegawai purna bhakti. Permasalahan struktural dan kultural menjadi hambatan utama, seperti kurangnya aturan pendukung turunan UU ASN, rule based bureaucracy, kurang pengawasan, dan belum terbangun budaya sistem merit. Hasil tersebut mengarah pada good looking government. Kedua, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi menunjukkan bahwa context of implementation dan faktor lingkungan cenderung lebih berpengaruh dibandingkan content of policy dan struktur administrator. Political will kepala daerah cenderung masih rendah sehingga kurang mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan teknis yang terjadi. Ketiga, strategi penguatan implementasi menunjukkan kepala daerah dan perangkatnya membutuhkan internalisasi outcomes, mempertimbangkan strategic context, menentukan strategic content, dan merumuskan operational process. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya aturan pendukung, mendorong political will gubernur, strategi asistensi, ujicoba program, penganggaran terpusat untuk program skala ekonomi tinggi, menyusun simplifikasi peraturan, membuka ruang dan mendorong inisiatif lokal, dan peningkatan kapasitas pegawai lokal merupakan beberapa rekomendasi tersebut. Selain itu, terdapat rekomendasi yang berkaitan dengan implikasi teoritis berupa pengembangan konsep kerangka implementasi strategi dari Okumus disertai perubahan alur kerangka kerja dan adanya penambahan indikator.

---

This study aims to analyze the implementation, influence factors, and strategy strengthening the implementation of state civil apparatus policy in Banten Province. The research paradigm is post-positivism with qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and document studies. Data analysis using Miles and Huberman model consist of data reduction, data display, and conclusion / verification and applying triangulation technique in validation. The results show three main points. First, the implementation is procedural, programmatic, and formal, resulting in negative impacts such as vacancy formation, hampered capacity building of employees, low employee performance, minimum welfare of employees, and not guaranteed after employees pension. Structural and cultural issues are the main obstacles. These results lead to good-looking government. Second, influencing factors show that context of implementation and environmental factors are more influential than content of policy and administrator structure. Political will of sub-national governor is still low so that it is less able to direct the budget, capacity of employees, politics, economy, and legal framework. Third, the strategy of strengthening the implementation indicates that the sub-national governor and its agencies require outcomes, consider the strategic context, determine the strategic content, and formulate the operational process. This research recommendation targets implementation, influencing factors, and strategies for strengthening implementation. The need for supporting rules at both the central and sub-national levels encourages the political will of sub-national governor, assistance strategies, testing to technical stages, centralized budgeting for programs of a general nature, compiling simplification of regulations, opening up spaces and encouraging local initiatives, and capacity building of local officials are some of these recommendations. In addition, there are recommendations related to the theoretical implications of developing the concept of Okumus strategy with changes of the framework and addition of indicators.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Pada tanggal 15 Januari 2014 telah diundangkan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Dengan berlakunya undang-undang tersebut telah terjadi pula perubahan komposisi kelembagaan yang mengurusi urusan kepegawaian dan sumber daya aparatur negara yaitu, i Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi ldquo;Kemenpan-RB rdquo; , yang berwenang dalam perumusan dan penetapan kebijakan, koordinasi dan sinkronisasi kebijakan, serta pengawasan atas pelaksanaan kebijakan ASN; ii Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara ldquo;KASN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam monitoring dan evaluasi pelaksanaan kebijakan dan Manajemen ASN untuk menjamin terwujudnya Sistem Merit serta pengawasan terhadap penerapan asas serta kode etik dan kode perilaku ASN; iii Lembaga Administrasi Negara ldquo;LAN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam penelitian, pengkajian kebijakan Manajemen ASN, pembinaan, dan penyelenggaraan pendidikan dan pelatihan ASN; dan iv Badan Kepegawaian Negara ldquo;BKN rdquo; yang berwenang dalam penyelenggaraan Manajemen ASN, pengawasan dan pengendalian pelaksanaan norma, standar, prosedur, dan kriteria Manajemen ASN. Namun dalam penerapan Manajemen ASN masih jauh dari kata sempurna. Hal ini terjadi karena masih banyak terdapat penyimpangan-penyimpangan yang terjadi baik dari lembaga pemerintah, Aparatur Sipil Negara itu sendiri, maupun Pejabat daerah terkait.

---

ABSTRACT
Law No. 5 of 2014 concerning on State Civil Apparatus ldquo State Civil Apparatus Law rdquo has became effective since15 January 2014. The effectiveness of this State Civil Apparatus Law changed the organizational composition that will be taking care of the personnel affairs and resources of the state apparatus which are, i The Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara or ldquo Kemenpan RB rdquo , that authorized in the policies formulation and stipulation, coordination, synchronization, and supervision of policies implementation ASN ii State Civil Apparatus Commission Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara ldquo KASN rdquo , that authorized in the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of ASN Management and Policy to ensure the realization of merit system along with the supervision of the application of ASN rsquo s principles and codes of conduct iii Public Administration Institute Lembaga Administrasi Negeara or ldquo LAN rdquo , that authorized in conducting research, ASN Management policy review, and ASN coaching and training iv State Personnel Board Badan Kepegawaian Negara or ldquo BKN rdquo that authorized in the implementation of ASN Management, conducting supervision and control of the norms, standards, procedure, and criteria of ASN Management. However, the application and implementation of the ASN Management itself is still far from the word of perfect. This happens because there are still many of deviations occur either from the government agencies, or the ASN itself, as well as the related local officials.

Abstrak :
Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) membawa perubahan besar bagi manajemen ASN di Indonesia melalui penerapan sistem merit. Sistem merit adalah prinsip penting dalam manajemen ASN yang bertumpu pada kualifikasi, kompetensi, dan kinerja secara adil dan wajar tanpa membedakan latar belakang politik, ras, warna kulit, agama, asal usul, jenis kelamin, status pernikahan, unsur, atau kondisi kecacatan (UU No. 5 Tahun 2014). Perjalanan menuju sistem meritokrasi yang sehat juga sangat berliku. Menjamurnya praktik jual beli jabatan yang masuk dalam kategori korupsi dan sudah melembaga juga menjadi keresahan besar bagi masyarakat. Seseorang bisa mendapatkan jabatan tertentu hanya dengan “orang dalam”, tanpa memperhatikan kompetensi dan juga kualifikasinya. Untuk itu, sistem merit hadir sebagai sistem yang diharapkan dapat menciptakan birokrasi yang profesional, kompeten, dan berintegritas tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis refleksi pelaksanaan sistem merit di Indonesia dalam seleksi rekrutmen CASN dan seleksi terbuka JPT. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori sistem merit dengan dimensi competence, qualification, performance, openness, dan fair and orderly process. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist dengan teknik pengumpulan data kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan sistem merit di Indonesia belum baik akibat dari resistensi internal, keterbatasan kapasitas pengawasan, dan praktik nepotisme. ......The enactment of Law No. 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus (ASN) has brought significant changes to ASN management in Indonesia through the implementation of the merit system. Merit system is an important principle in ASN management that emphasizes qualification, competence, and performance fairly and justly without discrimination based on political background, race, skin color, religion, origin, gender, marital status, elements, or disability status (Law No. 5 of 2014). The journey towards a healthy meritocracy has also been very winding. The rampant practice of buying and selling positions, which is categorized as corruption and has become institutionalized, is also a major concern for the public. Someone can get a certain position only with "insiders", without considering their competence and qualifications. Therefore, the merit system comes as a system that is expected to create a bureaucracy that is professional, competent, and has high integrity. This study aims to analyze the reflection of the implementation of the merit system in Indonesia in CASN recruitment selection and open JPT selection. This study uses the merit system theory with the dimensions of competence, qualification, performance, openness, and fair and orderly process. This study uses a post-positivist approach with qualitative data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature studies. The results of this study show that the implementation of the merit system in Indonesia is not yet good due to internal resistance, limited supervisory capacity, and nepotism practices.