Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk memahami fenomena media sosial dalam kaitannya mengenai konstruksi memori kolektif mengenai PKI dan komunisme. Penelitian ini mencoba menjelaskan cara kerja memori kolektif di media sosial, konstruksi narasinya, dan bentukan identitas. Dengan mengumpulkan data dari sebelas komunitas mnemonik, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tiga bentuk konstruksi memori di media sosial, yakni memori dominan, memori penanda kosong, dan kontra memori. Identitas yang terbentuk ada dua, yakni antikomunis yang partikularis dan kontra antikomunis yang universalis. Sementara itu terdapat dua wacana besar yang digunakan untuk mengonstruksikan narasi masa lalu mengenai PKI dan komunisme, yakni wacana antikomunis yang melihat Peristiwa Enam Lima sebagai pembunuhan para perwira militer dan wacana HAM yang melihatnya sebagai pembunuhan massal anggota dan simpatisan PKI.

---

ABSTRACT
This qualitative research aims to understand the phenomenon of social media as sites of memory construction of PKI and communism. This research tries to give explanation on how collective memory works on social media and its narrative and identity construction. By collecting and analyzing eleven mnemonic communitites, this research shows that the memory of PKI and communism in social media takes three forms in general, which are the dominant memory, the empty signifying memory, and the counter memory. The constructed collective identity is divided by two the particularists from which come the anticommunist groups and the universalists from which come the counter anticommunist groups. Furthermore this research argues that there are two big discourse constantly in contestation with one another, the anticommunist discourse and the human right discourse, within which the twos are used to view the 1965 Event mdash the former seeing it as the murder of seven military general and the latter seeing it as a mass murder towards the members of PKI.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh kemenangan pasangan Irwan Prayitno dan Nasrul Abit pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat tahun 2015. Kemenangan pasangan Irwan Prayitno dan Nasrul Abit ini disebabkan oleh tiga faktor, yaitu faktor jaringan sosial, dukungan partai politik dan kepemimpinan Irwan Prayitno. Dalam melakukan analisis, penulis menggunakan konsep social capital oleh Robert Putnam, modal politik dan kepemimpinan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan data primer dan data sekunder. Temuan penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kemenangan pasangan Irwan Prayitno dan Nasrul Abit disebabkan oleh modal sosial dan politik yang kuat yang bersumber dari faktor jaringan sosial dan dukungan partai politik pengusungnya. Selain itu, Kepemimpinan yang ditampilkan oleh Irwan Prayitno mampu mendapatkan kepercayaan dari masyarakat sehingga memperkuat modal sosial yang dimiliki oleh Pasangan Irwan Prayitno dan Nasrul Abit.

---

ABSTRAK
This research is based on the case of Irwan Prayitno and Nasrul Abit who won The Local Leaders Election in West Sumatera in 2015. The victory of Irwan Prayitno and Nasrul Abit was caused by three factors, such as social networks, support of political parties and Irwan Prayitnos leadership. By conducting and analyzing this research, the author uses the concept of social capital by Robert Putnam, therefore supported by political capital and leadership theory. This study uses qualitative methods with primary and secondary data. The research shows that the triumph of Irwan Prayitno and Nasrul Abit were strongly influenced by social and political capital which is originated by social networks and the support of political parties. Morever, the leadership which is showed by Irwan Prayitno was able to gain trust from the community so as to strengthen the social capital owned by Irwan Prayitno and Nasrul Abit.

Abstrak :
The essays in Outside In show how Americans lived within transnational circuits featuring impacts and influences running in multiple directions. While the field of international history generally emphasizes the impact of the United States on the rest of the world during the period of US ascendancy and while some scholars today stress how America has been shaped by external forces, the work assembled here rises above such disputes by showing the immense complexity of transnational currents that both shaped the United States and of which the United States was an inextricably, often central part. Here, the agents of globalization appear very concrete, not at all the disembodied, irresistible forces of some conventional narratives. Outside In also transcends the divide between work focusing on the international system of nation-states and transnational history that treats nonstate actors exclusively. The authors range very widely in topic from international economic management and international statecraft to missionary activity and global antiwar dissent, from intellectuals discussing womens rights and working for a minimum wage across borders to right-wing counterinsurgency operatives, from oil tycoons and worldwide evangelists to neoliberal ideologues and officeholders. Religion, diplomacy, economics, and warfare all have their places here, as do people ranging across the entire political spectrum, from left to right. These essays point to the best and most current research directions in the transnationalization of US history.