Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai maraknya kasus antisemitisme di Rusia pada kurun waktu 2004-2008 yang merupakan era pemerintahan Vladimir Putin yang kedua. Metode yang digunakan untuk menganalisis topik skripsi ini yaitu metode historis (sejarah) dan hasilnya akan disajikan dengan metode deskriptif-analitis. Hasil yang didapat dari hasil analisis bab empat adalah kasus antisemitisme di Rusia selama ini terjadi karena adanya stereotip-stereotip berkaitan dengan kaum Yahudi yang diwariskan secara turun-menurun dalam masyarakat Rusia yang multikultur serta anggapan bahwa kaum yahudi adalah sumber sagala masalah sehingga hal tersebut semakin menguatkan alas an tindak kekerasan terhadap mereka. Selain itu, pemerintah Rusia pada era kekuasaan Vladimir Putin kurang tanggap dalam merespon kasus-kasus antisemitisme yang terjadi sehingga kasusnya terus meningkat.

---

The focus of this final paper is about the problem of anti-Semitism which occurred in Russia during Vladimir Putin's second term in office namely 2004-2008. The method used o analyze the problem here is historical method, while the result will be presented with descriptive-analytical method. Result that obtained from the fourth chapter is anti-Semitic problems is Russia occurred because of the stereotypes which are associated with Jews, always passed from older generations to younger generations in multicultural Russian society, and the assumption that Jews are the source of all problems strengthen the reason for majority Russians to do violence on them. Besides that, the Russian government in Vladimir Putin's second term in office was less responsive in responding the anti-Semitic problem so that it keeps increasing time after time."

"Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis tentang pengadopsian model politik kekaisaran Byzantium dalam sistem pemerintahan Rusia pada masa pemerintahan pangeran Oleg hingga tsar Fyodor Ivanovich antara tahun 907-1598. Setelah mengidentifikasi pengadopsian tersebut, dapat diketahui seberapa besar kekaisaran Byzantium mempengaruhi Rusia pada Abad Kegelapan dan Abad Pertengahan. Dikarenakan Rusia banyak mengadopsi budaya dan ritus Byzantium, sangat penting untuk mengetahui alasan dibalik pengadopsian ini. Teori yang digunakan dalam skripsi ini adalah teori kekuasaan yang terdapat dalam buku “The Institutes of Justinian” yang bertujuan untuk membuktikan tentang pengaruh kekaisaran Byzantium dalam sistem pemerintahan Rusia. Mengenai penggunaan metode penelitian, digunakan metode penelitian sejarah. Sumber-sumber primer dari sisi Rusia, Byzantium, serta Eropa Barat juga digunakan untuk mendukung argumen-argumen yang ada. Setelah menyelesaikan penelitian ini, pengaruh kekaisaran Byzantium dalam bidang politik pada sistem pemerintahan Rusia dapat dibuktikan melalui sumber-sumber primer tersebut.

---

This undergraduate thesis is aimed to identifying and analyzing about the adoption of the Byzantine Empire’s political model in Russian government system during the reign of prince Oleg until tsar Fyodor Ivanovich from 907-1598 AD. After examining this adoption, it can be discovered how much Byzantine Empire had influenced Russia in dark age and medieval era. Because Russia adopted many Byzantine habits and rites, it is very important to know the reason behind this adoption. In this undergraduate thesis, the theory of power from “The Institutes of Justinian” is used to giving evidence about the influences of Byzantine Empire in Russia in their government system. In usage of method, historical method was used and primary sources from Russian, Byzantine, and Western Europe also mentioned to support the arguments. By finishing this research, the political influence of Byzantine Empire in Russia can be proven through literature review of primary sources.;"

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang kebijakan smart power Pemerintahan Vladimir Putin dalam menghadapi perluasan keanggotaan yang dilakukan oleh NATO pada tahun 2000-2008 ke Ukraina dan Georgia. Penulisan skripsi ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan bahwa pemerintahan Vladimir Putin tahun 2000-2008 berhasil mencegah ekspansi NATO ke Georgia dan Ukraina. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah deskriptif-analitis. Kebijakan smart power Vladimir Putin terdiri atas pendekatan lunak (soft power) dan pendekatan keras (hard power). Putin berusaha menaikkan citra Rusia di tingkat global untuk mendapat perhatian dunia melalui kedua pendekatan tersebut. Hard power dan soft power juga diterapkan di Ukraina dan Georgia dengan proporsi yang berbeda. Hingga akhir masa pemerintahannya Putin berhasil mencegah upaya Georgia dan Ukraina untuk bergabung dangan NATO melalui kebijakan Smart Power.

---

This thesis discusses the policy of Vladimir Putin?s smart power toward the expansion of NATO membership in 2000-2008 in Ukraine and Georgia. This thesis aims to prove that the Vladimir Putin government in 2000-2008 succeeded in preventing the expansion of NATO over Georgia and Ukraine. The research method used this thesis is a descriptive-analycal. Vladimir Putin?s policy of smart power concists of the soft approach (soft power) and the hard approach (hard power). Putin tried to raise the image of Russia at the global level to get world attention through both approaches. Both approaches are also implemented in Ukraine and Georgia in different proportions. By the end of his reign Putin managed to prevent Georgia and Ukraine?s efforts to join NATO through Smart Power policy."

"Solidarnost' adalah gerakan oposisi di Rusia yang muncul pada tahun 2008 dan hingga kini masih ada. Gerakan ini menjadi payung oposisi liberal-demokrat terhadap pemerintahan Putin-Medvedev. Data primer penelitian berupa laporan independen, siaran pers, dan survei tentang gerakan ini pada tahun 2008-2017. Melalui metode kualitatif dan studi pustaka, skripsi ini berusaha menjelaskan keberadaan gerakan Solidarnost' dengan menggunakan teori dan tipe oposisi Robert A. Dahl dan H. Gordon Skilling. Berdasarkan hal itu, gerakan Solidarnost' berperan sebagai oposisi faksional dalam demokrasi Rusia. Dengan afiliasi partai politik, Solidarnost' melancarkan aksi massa dan wacana anti-Putin dengan cara mengkritik kebijakan-kebijakan dibidang politik dan pemerintahan, ekonomi dan energi, serta perang dan HAM.

---

Solidarnost rsquo is an opposition movement in Russia that appeared in 2008 and still exists. This movement became the umbrella of the liberal democratic opposition to the Putin Medvedev government. The primary data were independent reports, press releases, and surveys of the movement in 2008 mdash 2017. Through qualitative method and literature study, this thesis aims to explain the existence of Solidarnost rsquo movement by using theory and opposition type of Robert A. Dahl and H. Gordon Skilling. Based on this, the Solidarnost rsquo movement serves as a factional opposition in Russian democracy. With political party affiliation, Solidarnost rsquo launches mass action and anti Putin discourse by criticizing policies in the field of politics and government, economy and energy, and war and human rights. "

"Summary: "A timely, topical book grounding Russia's recent turn towards conservativism in pre-1917 culture and explaining what this shift could mean for the rest of the world"--"

"Vladimir Putin's intervention into the Georgia/​South Ossetia conflict in summer 2008 was quickly recognized by Western critics as an attempt by Russia to increase its presence and power in the "near abroad", or the independent states of the former Soviet Union that Russia still regards as its wards. Though the global economic recession that began in 2008 moved the incident to the back of the world's mind, Russia surged to the forefront again six years later when they invaded the heavily Russian Crimea in Ukraine and annexed it. In contrast to the earlier Georgia episode, this new conflict has generated a crisis of global proportions, forcing European countries to rethink their relationship with Russia and their reliance on it for energy supplies, as Russia was now squeezing natural gas from what is technically Ukraine. In Near Abroad, the eminent political geographer Gerard Toal analyzes Russia's recent offensive actions in the near abroad, focusing in particular on the ways in which both the West and Russia have relied on Cold War-era rhetorical and emotional tropes that distort as much as they clarify. In response to Russian aggression, US critics quickly turned to tried-and-true concepts like "spheres of influence" to condemn the Kremlin. Russia in turn has brought back its long tradition of criticizing western liberalism and degeneracy to grandly rationalize its behavior in what are essentially local border skirmishes. It is this tendency to resort to the frames of earlier eras that has led the conflicts to "jump scales," moving from the regional to the global level in short order. The ambiguities and contradictions that result when nations marshal traditional geopolitical arguments-rooted in geography, territory, and old understandings of distance-further contributes to the escalation of these conflicts. Indeed, Russia's belligerence toward Georgia stemmed from concern about its possible entry into NATO, an organization of states thousands of miles away. American hawks also strained credulity by portraying Georgia as a nearby ally in need of assistance. Similarly, the threat of NATO to the Ukraine looms large in the Kremlin's thinking, and many Ukrainians themselves self-identify with the West despite their location in Eastern Europe"