Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Road Funds, financed from user charges; have been practiced in many countries in securing more reliable funding for rock The idea of an of budget source of funding is appealing. But they are most effective where they form part of a broader strategy to manage roads in a more business-like way on a fee-for-service basis: the link between user charges - tariffs for road use ~ and road expenditures, reinforced by user participation in their oversight creates a sense of ownership and puts pressure on road agencies for greater transparency, accountability, and efficiency. This is in tune with Indonesia 's moves towards better governance and democratic accountability under decentralization. This paper discusses the paradigm shifts that are now taking place and considers them as the rationales behind the attempt to establish a road fund in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
The _first generation of Road Funds were set up during the 1960's and 1970's in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. They were characterized by weak legal basis, relied on earmarked revenues, typically managed by national road agency, and have no oversight board The second generation road agency was born in early 1990 is with the introduction of new thought of commercial management of road They were distinct from the _first generation by having revenues generated from charges related to road use, managed through a separate administration, supported by sound legislation, and by having a public- private oversight board made up of nominees of organizations with a strong vested interest in well- managed roam. This paper o't1s'cusses the history of Road Funds, examines their advantage and disadvantages, and studies their impacts on the road management.