Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 2 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Muhammad Fauzi
"[ ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini tentang pengaruh ketidakpastian dalam informasi kandidat
terhadap preferensi politik. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga ingin melihat pengaruh
sikap terhadap risiko sebagai moderator dari pengaruh ketidakpastian terhadap
preferensi politik. Penelitian ini melibatkan 83 Mahasiswa Diploma dan Strata-
1 yang ada di berbagai fakultas di Universitas Indonesia. Ketidakpastian dilihat
dari informasi kandidat, dengan kandidat petahana yang memiliki
ketidakpastian rendah, dan kandidat penantang dengan ketidakpastian tinggi.
Untuk mengukur sikap terhadap risiko digunakan alat ukur Domain Specific
Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT). Preferensi politik diukur melalui penilaian
positif terhadap masing-masing kandidat. Melalui teknik statistik Mixed-Anova,
hasil dari penelitian ini tidak menunjukkan adanya pengaruh ketidakpastian
dalam informasi kandidat terhadap preferensi politik seseorang untuk memilih
kandidat, dan tidak adanya pengaruh moderasi dari sikap terhadap risiko pada
pengaruh ketidakpastian terhadap preferensi politik
ABSTRACTThis research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences In addition this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata 1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties and challenger candidates with high uncertainties Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale DOSPERT used to measure risk attitude Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate Through Mixed ANOVA statistical techniques the results of this study did not show any effect of This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences. In addition, this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences. The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata-1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia. Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates, the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties, and challenger candidates with high uncertainties. Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT) used to measure risk attitude. Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate. Through Mixed-ANOVA statistical techniques, the results of this study did not show any effect of uncertainty in the information candidates against one's political preference for choosing a candidate, and there is no moderating effect of risk attitude of the effect of uncertainty to political preferences.;This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences In addition this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata 1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties and challenger candidates with high uncertainties Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale DOSPERT used to measure risk attitude Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate Through Mixed ANOVA statistical techniques the results of this study did not show any effect of This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences. In addition, this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences. The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata-1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia. Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates, the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties, and challenger candidates with high uncertainties. Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT) used to measure risk attitude. Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate. Through Mixed-ANOVA statistical techniques, the results of this study did not show any effect of uncertainty in the information candidates against one's political preference for choosing a candidate, and there is no moderating effect of risk attitude of the effect of uncertainty to political preferences.;This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences In addition this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata 1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties and challenger candidates with high uncertainties Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale DOSPERT used to measure risk attitude Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate Through Mixed ANOVA statistical techniques the results of this study did not show any effect of This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences. In addition, this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences. The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata-1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia. Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates, the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties, and challenger candidates with high uncertainties. Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT) used to measure risk attitude. Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate. Through Mixed-ANOVA statistical techniques, the results of this study did not show any effect of uncertainty in the information candidates against one's political preference for choosing a candidate, and there is no moderating effect of risk attitude of the effect of uncertainty to political preferences., This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences In addition this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata 1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties and challenger candidates with high uncertainties Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale DOSPERT used to measure risk attitude Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate Through Mixed ANOVA statistical techniques the results of this study did not show any effect of This research is about the effect of uncertainty in the candidates information on political preferences. In addition, this study also wants to see the effect of risk attitude as the moderator of the effect of uncertainty political preferences. The study involved 83 students Diploma and Strata-1 in various faculties at the University of Indonesia. Uncertainty seen from the information the candidates, the incumbent candidates who have low uncertainties, and challenger candidates with high uncertainties. Domain Specific Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT) used to measure risk attitude. Political preferences measured by a positive assessment of each candidate. Through Mixed-ANOVA statistical techniques, the results of this study did not show any effect of uncertainty in the information candidates against one's political preference for choosing a candidate, and there is no moderating effect of risk attitude of the effect of uncertainty to political preferences.]"
Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S61928
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Adena Ramadhany
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi budaya sadar risiko pada Perusahaan Asuransi berdasarkan The Institute of Management (IRM) Risk Culture Framework dengan menilai perspektif individu dan organisasi. Studi ini menekankan bahwa budaya kesadaran risiko yang kuat merupakan fondasi kematangan manajemen risiko. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Sumber yang digunakan adalah data primer yang diperoleh langsung dari objek penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei dan wawancara. Statistik deskriptif dan analisis naratif digunakan untuk menganalisis data yang telah dikumpulkan. Berdasarkan analisis tingkat individu, personel PT XYZ mempunyai tingkat toleransi risiko sedang dan rendah. Mereka cenderung tidak nyaman mengambil risiko tanpa analisis dan perhitungan yang memadai serta memiliki karakter yang penuh persiapan. Personel juga mempertimbangkan ketiga etika yakni kepatuhan, kepedulian dan logika dalam pengambilan keputusan sehari-hari. Berdasarkan analisis tingkat organisasi, budaya organisasi PT XYZ masuk dalam kategori komunal yang memiliki dimensi solidaritas dan sosial tinggi. Orang-orang dalam kategori ini mempunyai ciri kerja tim yang baik di seluruh fungsi serta mempunyai fokus tujuan yang sama. Evaluasi terhadap delapan aspek budaya risiko berdasarkan IRM risk culture aspects model, terdapat empat aspek yang merupakan praktik unggul (risk leadership, accountability, risk resources, dan risk skill) dan tiga aspek praktik baik (reward, dealing with bad news dan informed risk decisions) serta satu aspek praktik lemah atau senjang (transparency).

The study aims to evaluate risk awareness culture in an Insurance Company based on The Institute of Management (IRM) Risk Culture Framework by assesing their individual and organizational perspective. This study emphasizes that a robust risk awareness culture is a foundation of risk mangement maturity. This study is a descriptive qualitative method. The data source is primary data obtained directly from the research object. This study employs a survey based and an interview based. Descriptive statistics and narrative analysis are used to analyze data by describing or illustrating the data that has been collected. Based on the individual level analysis, PT XYZ personnel have an average and low level of risk tolerance. They tend to be uncomfortable taking risks without adequate analysis and calculations and have a prepared character. Personnel within organization also have high conscience in ethic obedience, ethic of care and ethic of reason when carrying out decision day-to-day basis. Based on organizational level analysis, PT XYZ’s organizational culture described as Communal, which has high solidarity and social dimension. People in this category is characterized by good team work across function and goals focused. The evaluation of eight aspect of risk culture based on IRM risk culture aspects model, there are four aspects have excellent practices(risk leadership, accountability, risk resources, and risk skill) and three aspects have good practices (reward, dealing with bad news and informed risk decisions) and one aspects has fair practices (transparency)."
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2024
T-pdf
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library