Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Sebagai partai populis, PTI berhasil mengakhiri dominasi panjang dari Partai Dinasti Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) dan Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) yang telah berkuasa selama puluhan tahun. Keberhasilan PTI didorong oleh rekam jejak populisnya, baik dalam bentuk retorika, kebijakan politik, maupun aksi di luar pemerintahan. Imran Khan selaku pemimpin PTI memanfaatkan situasi kekecewaan masyarakat terhadap pemerintahan PML-N dan PPP yang dianggap tidak kompeten dalam menangani berbagai isu korupsi, nepotisme, serta kebijakan yang tidak merata. Dalam hal ini, Imran Khan memposisikan PTI sebagai alternatif dari berbagai isu tersebut. Pada penelitiannya, artikel ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menganalisis data-data sekunder berupa artikel, jurnal, video, dan buku terkait untuk menganalisis populisme PTI sejak awal berdiri hingga kemenangannya pada pemilihan umum 2018. Artikel ini juga akan menggunakan studi kepartaian untuk menganalisis secara deskriptif mengenai perbedaan antara PTI dengan PML-N dan PPP. Secara lebih lanjut, artikel ini akan menggunakan teori populisme (Mudde dan Kaltwasser, 2017) yang menyatakan populisme adalah fenomena politik yang muncul sebagai respons terhadap kondisi struktural tertentu dalam masyarakat. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan PTI tidak hanya didasarkan pada strategi kampanye yang efektif, tetapi juga terdapat momentum dalam lanskap politik Pakistan yang memungkinkan partai populis seperti PTI mendapat sorotan publik secara signifikan hingga akhirnya memenangkan pemilihan umum tahun 2018.

---

As a populist party, PTI succeeded in ending the long dominance of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan People's Party (PPP) dynasties, which had been in power for decades. PTI's success is driven by its populist track record, both in the form of rhetoric, political policies, and actions outside of government. Imran Khan, as the leader of the PTI, took advantage of the situation of public disappointment with the PML-N and PPP governments, which were considered incompetent in dealing with various issues of corruption, nepotism, and uneven policies. In this case, Imran Khan positions PTI as an alternative to these various issues. In its research, this article uses a qualitative approach by analyzing secondary data in the form of related articles, journals, videos, and books to analyze PTI's populism from its inception until its victory in the 2018 general election. This article will also use party studies to descriptively analyze the differences between PTI, PML-N, and PPP. Furthermore, this article will use the theory of populism (Mudde and Kaltwasser, 2017), which states that populism is a political phenomenon that arises as a response to certain structural conditions in society. The findings of this research indicate that PTI's success was not only based on an effective campaign strategy but also that there was momentum in Pakistan's political landscape that allowed a populist party like PTI to gain significant public attention and ultimately win the 2018 general elections."

"The work discusses a significant event that occurred on May 1, 2021, when the Legislative Assembly of El Salvador removed the Justices of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice before their term expiration, violating legal procedures. This action was facilitated by a combination of populist rhetoric from the President and abuse of power by the Legislative Assembly. Referred to as Constitutional Authoritarian-Populism, this trend undermines the rule of law. The text outlines the Salvadoran constitutional framework and discusses concepts like judicial independence, populism, abusive constitutionalism, and authoritarianism in the Latin American context. It then examines instances of Constitutional Authoritarian-Populism in El Salvador from 2019 to 2023, demonstrating that the removal of the Justices wasn’t spontaneous. Finally, it analyzes the process of removal, the response from the removed Justices, and the subsequent decision by newly appointed Justices to authorize presidential re-election in El Salvador."