Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Prompted by poor performance of most state-owned enterprises, the Indonesian government has made the partnership between state-owned and private firms as one of its `strategic' steps. However, partnership between business entities from different institutional backgrounds can cause uneasy relationship stemming from different characters and imbalanced position between partners. In the Indonesian context, partnerships between state and private firms show imbalance in which the former enjoy more prestige and power than the later. Dependency is reflected in the obligation of spending some cost by private companies, some of which become additional income or rent to the executives of state firms. The case study looks at the joint-operation in sugar production for the milling season of 2001-2002 between the state-owned PT Perkebunan Nusantara XIV (PTPN XIV) and the privately owned PT Kalpataru Semesta (PTKS). During the course of the joint-operation, relations between two partners have demonstrated lack of transparency and growing distrust. Complexities have intensified because of a persistent competition between key actors, namely president directors of the respective firms, in an attempt to show that each was more powerful than the other. This research tries to answer four questions. First, how is partnership between PTPN XIV and PTKS possible? Second, why are differences between both partners so wide and very difficult to reconcile? Third, how are the relationships between actors during the implementation of the partnership? Fourth, how do partners eventually agree on the termination of their joint-operation? In brief, this study attempts to reveal various processes, networks, and structures that affect the partnership. Due to his position as a member of the Monitoring Team of the joint-operation project, the researcher chooses to apply participant observation as the main method of data collection. Informal talks and interviews with other actors and informants also contribute to the process. This study takes into consideration three theoretical perspectives, namely Exchange, Exchange-Network, and Governance theories, but all lack of comprehension in describing the overall structures and processes behind the partnership. This has led to the formulation of a combination of relevant ideas and aspects of those theories by utilizing concepts and ideas of the dramaturgical and social capital perspectives. This attempt has resulted in the emergence of a pair of exchange network models of key actors; and a matrix of all relevant actors and elements. This research finds that in contrast to widespread practices in Indonesia, state firms are not permanently stronger than their private counterparts. The relative position between PTPN XIV and PTKS demonstrates a dynamic imbalance in the sense that either the state-owned or private firms may hold dominance over the other. In the initiation phase, the private partner gains strong position over the state-owned partner. During the implementation of the partnership, both demonstrate dominance interchangeably depending on the specific circumstances. At the final phase, the state-owned firm shows its strength and the private company has to accept that it is dependent on its state-owned counterpart. In general, the partnership between PTPN XIV and PTKS reflects a success and a failure simultaneously. It has succeeded in salvaging the ill-fated state-owned firm, or serving public interest, but at the same time it fails in delivering satisfactory profit to private partner. In addition to its failure, the project proves that a governance arrangement fails to perform well under a distrustful relationship between partners as a result of mysterious behavior of the PTPN XIV president director. However the involvement of a state official has served two functions; first, help make partnership possible in the first place, second, create a forum through which partners meet to discuss differences. The study recommends that state officials should . take a more active role in managing tensions and reducing unnecessary differences between partners. State-owned enterprises should be encouraged to open up their data and predictions that are highly relevant to the joint-project. This will help create trust and norm of mutual benefit between partners. Private companies, despite their strong position, should be well-prepared prior to entering into an agreement with state firms. They should obtain sufficient knowledge especially on the calculation methods of production costs and the familiarity with key actors from the other side in the partnership.

Abstrak :
Seiring dengan meningkatnya jumlah penduduk dan pendapatan per kapita penduduk Indonesia, kebutuhan akan hasil-hasil peternakan juga meningkat. Sektor agribisnis peternakan mengalami perkembangan yang pesat. Pola Inti-Plasma merupakan salah satu bentuk kemitraan yang diterapkan di sektor peternakan, termasuk dalam budidaya peternakan ayam. Penggunaan Pola Inti-Plasma semakin menguat setelah krisis yang melanda Indonesia pada kurun waktu 1997-1998 yang juga telah memukul sektor peternakan. Hal ini merupakan manifestasi dari adanya kehendak dari para peternak untuk mencari rasa aman dari fluktuasi harga meskipun keuntungan yang diperoleh relatif lebih sedikit. Perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan yang dibuat antara perusahaan inti dengan peternak plasma harus mengacu pada aspek-aspek hukum perjanjian, baik asas-asas hukum perjanjian, syarat sahnya perjanjian, bagian-bagian atau unsur-unsur perjanjian, serta bentuk perjanjian. Dari studi kasus ini diketahui bahwa perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan pada budidaya peternakan ayam yang diterapkan di PT. CAS telah memenuhi asas konsensualisme, asas kekuatan mengikat, asas kebebasan berkontrak, serta syarat sahnya terbentuknya perjanjian. Demikian juga dengan bentuk atau anatomi perjanjian telah memadai. Namun demikian, perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan tersebut belum sepenuhnya memenuhi asas keseimbangan dan asas itikad baik. Guna memenuhi kedua asas tersebut, diperlukan keterlibatan pemerintah dalam memberikan bimbingan dan bantuan teknis kepada peternak dan menetapkan mekanisme arbitrase untuk menyelesaikan konflik antara perusahaan inti dengan peternak plasma. Selain itu, diperlukan juga keyakinan perusahaan inti untuk menerapkan jaminan kepada peternak plasma. ......Along with the increasing of numbers and income per capita of Indonesia's population, the need for the livestock’s product is also increases. Livestock agribusiness sector experienced rapid development. The Pattern of Nucleus-Plasma is one of form of partnership that is also applied in the livestock sector, including in chicken farming. The Pattern of Nucleus-Plasma increasingly used after the crisis that hit Indonesia in the period of 1997-1998, that had also strike the livestock sector. This is a manifestation of the willingness of chicken farmers to seek security from price fluctuations despite the benefits are relatively few. Partnership Agreement made between the nucleus-company and plasma-farmers should refer to the legal aspects of the agreement, namely the principles of contract law, the validity requirements of the agreement, the parts or elements of the agreement, and the form of agreement. From the case study, it is found that the partnership agreement on chicken farming applied in PT. CAS has fulfilled the principle of consensus, the principle of the binding force, the principle of freedom of contract, as well as the validity requirements of the agreement. Likewise, the form or anatomy of agreement is adequate. However, the partnership agreement does not fully comply with the principle of balance and the principle of good faith. To meet the last both principles of contract law, it is necessary for government to involve in providing guidance and technical assistance to farmers, and establish an arbitration mechanism to resolve the conflict between the nucleuscompany and plasma-farmers. In addition, the nucleus-company should confidence to require a warranty to plasma-farmers.

Abstrak :
Perkembangan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) di beberapa negara memiliki peranan yang penting dan merupakan penggerak roda perekonomian. Salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh UMKM dalam meningkatkan peranannya dalam bidang ekonomi adalah melalui hubungan kerjasama dengan Usaha Besar melalui mekanisme kemitraan. Dalam hubungan kemitraan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah menghadapi persaingan yang tidak sebanding diantara Usaha Besar dan UMKM akibat skala usaha yang lebih kecil dan posisi tawar yang lemah. Dalam rangka meningkatkan posisi tawar dari UMKM, terbentuknya struktur pasar yang menjamin tumbuhnya persaingan usaha yang sehat dan melindungi konsumen serta mencegah terjadinya penguasaan pasar oleh orang perorangan atau kelompok tertentu yang merugikan UMKM maka diterbitkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah berdasarkan ketentuan perundang-undangan tersebut pelaksanaan kemitraan perlu diawasi secara tertib dan teratur oleh lembaga yang dibentuk dan bertugas untuk mengawasi persaingan usaha yaitu Komisi pengawas persaingan Usaha (KPPU). Amanat pengawasan pelaksanaan kemitraan melahirkan tugas dan kewenangan baru kepada KPPU untuk menjaga iklim usaha dan persaingan yang sehat khususnya dalam pelaksanaan kemitraan di Indonesia. ......The development of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in some countries have an important role and is driving the economy. One effort that can be made by SMEs in enhancing its role in the economy is through partnerships with large company through a partnership mechanism. In a partnership relationship Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises face competition not comparable between Large Enterprises and SMEs due to the smaller scale enterprises and weak bargaining position. In order to improve the bargaining position of SMEs, the formation of market structure that ensures the growth of fair competition and protect consumers and prevent market domination by an individual or group that is detrimental to SMEs then passed Law No. 20 of 2008 on Micro, Small and medium and Government Regulation No. 17 of 2013 on the Implementation of Law No. 20 of 2008 on Micro, Small, and medium Enterprises under the provisions of the legislation implementing the partnership needs to be monitored in an orderly and organized by the institution established and tasked to oversee the Commission For Supervison Of Business Competition (KPPU). Supervision of the implementation of the mandate of the partnership spawned new duties and powers to the Commission to keep the business climate and fair competition, especially in the implementation of partnership in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
In 2 english as an innovative and effective multimedia english language learning and teaching website came about through a creative partnership between the British Council (BC) the British Broadcasting Coorporation (BBC),china central radio and television university (CCRTVU) and CRTVU-online distance educational.....

Abstrak :
Tesis ini membahas mengenai pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa pemerintah dengan metode penunjukan langsung, untuk mengetahui landasan teori dan tujuan pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa pemerintah serta proses pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa pemerintah melalui metode penunjukan langsung serta dampak penunjukan langsung terhadap persaingan usaha. Metode penelitian yang akan digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang berbasis atau mengacu pada kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersifat preskriptif yang artinya penelitian yang ditujukan untuk mendapatkan saran-saran mengenai apa yang harus dilakukan untuk mengatasi masalah-masalah tersebut. Pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa pemerintah didasarkan pada teori tujuan negara sejahtera (welfare state). Suatu pandangan dimana kesejahteraan masyarakat menjadi tujuan dibentuknya Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia berdasarkan Pembukaan UUD 1945 Alinea ke IV. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini, pemerintah dalam menjalankan aktivitas negara memerlukan infrastruktur penunjang dalam bentuk barang dan/atau jasa oleh karena itu Pemerintah melakukan pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa. Metode penunjukan langsung pengadaan barang/jasa dilakukan dengan mengundang satu penyedia barang/jasa untuk memasukkan proposal penawaran, tanpa pengumuman informasi pengadaan dan juga tanpa adanya seleksi penyedia barang/jasa. Tidak ada persaingan dan tidak ada penentuan atau penunjukan pemenang. Pengadaan barang dan/atau jasa pemerintah dengan metode penunjukan langsung berpotensi melanggar Prinsipprinsip persaingan usaha yang sehat dan melanggar Pasal 19 huruf a dan huruf d (perilaku menghambat dan praktek diskriminasi), dan Pasal 22 (larangan persekongkolan tender) UU No. 5/1999. Pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah dengan metode penunjukan langsung diperlukan pengawasan dari pihak internal dalam hal ini Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam bentuk pelaporan setiap kegiatan pengadaan barang/jasa melalui penunjukan langsung. Hal ini dilakukan untuk menghindari adanya potensi kerugian negara yang bisa saja terjadi dengan adanya persekongkolan penunjukan langsung, bukan hanya dengan persekongkolan tender. Dengan kata lain pemerintah pun harus tunduk pada prinsip-prinsip persaingan usaha yang sehat untuk menciptakan kondisi pasar yang kondusif dan sehat.

---

This thesis discusses the procurement of goods and/or services to the government's direct appointment method, to determine the theoretical basis and purpose of procurement of goods and/or services and government procurement of goods and/or services of the government through direct appointment method and the effects of direct appointment of competition. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research is research-based law or refer to the rules or norms of law contained in the legislation are prescriptive, which means study aimed to get suggestions on what which must be done to overcome these problems. Procurement of goods and/or services based on the theory of government welfare state goals (welfare state). An overview of where the welfare of society becomes purpose of the establishment of the Republic of Indonesia based on the 1945 opening paragraph IV. To achieve this goal, the government in carrying out the activity states require supporting infrastructure in the form of goods and/or services therefore the Government procurement of goods and/or services. Direct appointment method of procurement of goods/services performed by inviting the providers of goods/services to include the bid proposal, without the announcement of procurement information and also without the selection of providers of goods/services. There is no competition and no determination or designation of a winner. Procurement of goods and/or services to the government's direct appointment method could potentially violate the principles of fair competition and violates Article 19 letters a and d (inhibit behavior and practice of discrimination) and Article 22 (prohibition of bid rigging) Law 5/1999. Procurement of goods/services of government by the method of direct appointment necessary oversight of internal parties in this case the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in the form of reporting any activity procurement of goods/services through direct appointment. This is done to avoid any potential losses that could occur by direct appointment conspiracy, not only with bid rigging. In other words, the government must also be subject to the principles of fair competition to create the conditions conducive and healthy market.

Abstrak :
Tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi program Ecopreneurship kajian dalam Kemitraan Petani Buah Naga yang berkaitan dengan pelibatan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat lokal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post positivis dengan metode kualitatif untuk memperoleh pemahaman mengenai permasalahan yang diangkat. Penelitian ini menggunakan evaluasi metode CIPP (Context , Input, Process, Product) termasuk menganalisis faktor pendukung dan faktor penghambat yang berpengaruh dalam program tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa program Ecopreneurship telah berhasil menciptakan kemandirian masyarakat dalam bentuk Sentra Pemberdayaan Tani (SPT) secara terpadu yang berbasis pada kearifan lokal melalui pendekatan OVOP (One Village One Product) karena letak geografisnya yang sangat mendukung khususnya dalam budidaya buah naga yang memiliki nilai ekonomi cukup tinggi dalam upaya membantu meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. ......This thesis aims to evaluate the partnership program ecopreneurship study dragon fruit growers with regard to the involvement and empowerment of local communities. This study uses a post positivis approach with a qualitative method to gain an understanding of the issues raised. This research uses evaluation CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) method includes analyzis of the supporting factors and inhibiting factors that influence in the program. Results from this study indicate that the program ecopreneurship has succeeded in creating self-reliance in the form Sentra Empowerment of Farmers in an integrated manner based on local wisdom through OVOP (One Village One Product) approach, because of their geography very supportive especially in the cultivation of dargon fruit that has economic value is high enough in order to help improve the welfare society.

Abstrak :
Dalam melakukan suatu usaha harus menerapkan prinsip-prinsip persaingan usaha sehat seperti yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat yaitu tidak melakukan monopoli, monopsoni, penguasaan pasar dan sebagainya. Tetapi dalam Pasal 50a menyatakan bahwa 'ketentuan dalam undang-undang ini dapat dikecualikan apabila perbuatan dan/atau perjanjian tersebut bertujuan melaksanakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku'. Apabila perbuatan dan/atau perjanjian yang dimaksud tersebut merupakan suatu perbuatan untuk melakukan suatu kegiatan usaha dalam hal umum maka ketentuan tersebut tidak menjadi masalah, tetapi apabila perbuatan dan/atau perjanjian tersebut merupakan melakukan suatu kegiatan usaha dalam bidang kemitraan maka hal tersebut akan menyebabkan suatu masalah yaitu terjadinya pertentangan antara Pasal 50a Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah. Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 menyatakan bahwa 'Kemitraan adalah kerjasama dalam keterkaitan usaha, baik langsung maupun tidak langsung, atas dasar prinsip saling memerlukan, mempercayai, memperkuat, dan menguntungkan'. Sehingga berdasarkan hal tersebut dalam tesis ini akan dibahas mengenai perjanjian kemitraan inti plasma di Indonesia, kesesuaian perjanjian kemitraan dengan prinsip-prinsip persaingan usaha sehat, dan pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan kemitraan sektor perkebunan. ......In performing an business must apply the principles business competition healthy as regulated in the law number 5 years 1999 on prohibition of monopoly and unfair business competition that is they did not do monopoly, as having only one buyer, mastery market and so on. But in article 50a stated that 'a provision in a law this could be exempted when deeds and / or agreement was aimed to implement laws and regulations'. When deeds and / or agreement referred to this is a deed to perform a business activities in terms of common so this regulation was not be a problem, but when deeds and / or agreement was done a business activities in the field of partnership so that this will cause a problem that is the difference between article 50a the act of number 5 years 1999 on prohibition of monopoly and unfair business competition with act number 20 years 2008 on micro business, small and medium. On bill number 20 years 2008 stated that 'partnership is cooperation in entanglement business, either directly or indirectly, based on the principle need each other, trust, strengthen, and profitable'. So based on such statement in this will be discussed in the partnership agreements the nucleus plasma in Indonesia, conformity partnership agreements with the principles business competition healthy, and supervision with the implementation of the partnership the agricultural sector.

Abstrak :
Perjanjian Kemitraan Antara Ritel Modern Dengan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah (UMKM) di dalam Persaingan Usaha Industri Ritel Terdapat Posisi Dominan dan Ketidakseimbangan oleh Ritel Modern yang berdampak terhadap Kesejahteraan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah (UMKM). Penelitian ini membahas Permasalahan mengenai bagaimana Implementasi Perjanjian Kemitraan antara Ritel Modern dengan UMKM di Wilayah Kota Madya Bogor, dan apakah Perjanjian Kemitraan antara Ritel Modern dengan UMKM tersebut sesuai dengan Prinsip-Prinsip Persaingan Usaha Sehat, serta bagaimana Model/Mekanisme Pengawasan Perjanjian Kemitraan antara Ritel Modern dengan UMKM. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Dalam Tesis ini, penulis mengambil contoh perjanjian kemitraan antara Yogya Bogor Junction (Ritel Modern) dengan salah satu Usaha Kecil di wilayah Kota Bogor. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa secara tidak langsung Yogya Bogor Junction telah menguasai UMKM sebagai mitra usahanya dalam pelaksanaan hubungan kemitraan, hal tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 35 UU No. 20 Tahun 2008 tentang UMKM Jo. Pasal 12 huruf (a) PP No. 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan UU No. 20 Tahun 2008 tentang UMKM. Pengawasan Kemitraan menggunakan 2 (dua) jenis Pengawasan yaitu Pengawasan secara Preventif dan Pengawasan secara Represif, Perizinan merupakan salah satu bentuk Pengawasan Preventif dan yang berwenang melakukan Pengawasan Represif adalah Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). Pada akhirnya penulis menyarankan bahwa Pemerintah Pusat harus terus mengawasi Pelaksanaan maupun Penerapan Program Kemitraan agar dapat berjalan sesuai yang diharapkan dan hendaknya Usaha Besar Ritel Modern selalu memegang teguh prinsip-prinsip persaingan usaha yang sehat, agar dapat ikut membina usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah menjadi lebih mandiri dan berdaya guna. ......Partnership Agreement between Modern Retail with The Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the retail industry competition there dominant position and imbalance by Modern Retail that affecting welfare Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises (SMEs). This study discusses the problem about The Implementation of The Partnership Agreement between Modern Retail with SMEs in The Bogor City, and whether The Partnership Agreement between The Modern Retail with SMEs in accordance with The Principles Of Fair Business Competition, and how The Model/Monitoring Mechanism Partnership Agreement between The Modern Retail with SMEs. The Method used in this Research is a normative legal research methods, with the approach of legislation. In this research, The Authors take an example of a Partnership Agreement between Yogya Bogor Junction (Modern Retail) with a Small Enterprise in The Bogor City. The Research concludes that indirectly Yogya Bogor Junction has mastered SMEs as business partners in The Implementation of The Partnership, it is contrary to Article 35 of Act Number 20 of 2008 on SMEs and Article 12 (a) of Government Regulation Number 17 of 2013 on The Implementation of Act Number 20 of 2008 on SMEs. Monitoring partnership uses two (2) types of monitoring is preventive and repressive, licensing is one form of preventive monitoring and authorized to repressive monitoring is The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). In The End, The Authors recommend that The Central Government must be continue to monitor implementation and application of partnership program to make it work as expected and should large enterprises such as Modern Retail always uphold The Principles Of Of Fair Business Competition, in order to participate to foster Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises become more independent and efficient.

Abstrak :
Pada pendirian persekutuan komanditer terdapat persyaratan yang harus dipenuhi oleh pendiri. Pendiri dalam hal ini merupakan perorangan yang tentunya cakap untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum. Suami isteri merupakan perorangan yang cakap untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum khususnya mendirikan persekutuan komanditer. Namun terdapat hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan apabila suami isteri akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer karena mereka tunduk pula pada Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tantang perkawinan yang menyangkut harta bersama mereka. Maka timbul permasalahan bagaimana pendirian persekutuan komanditer yang didirikan suami isteri tanpa adanya perjanjian kawin, bagaimana pendirian persekutuan komanditer yang didirikan suami isteri tanpa adanya perjanjian kawin apabila terdapat utang dalam persekutuan komanditer, bagaimana peran notaris apabila terdapat suami isteri yang akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer. Penulis meneliti permasalahan tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Suami isteri tidak dapat mendirikan persekutuan komanditer karena terdapat syarat yang tidak terpenuhi yaitu didirikan oleh 2 (dua) orang atau lebih. Selain itu apabila terdapat utang dalam persekutuan komanditer maka pihak yang menjadi sekutu pasif ikut bertanggung jawab terhadap utang. Dalam hal ini definisi persekutuan komanditer tidak terpenuhi. Dalam hal ini peran notaris sangat penting karena notaris wajib membuat akta dengan seksama dan melakukan penyuluhan atas aktanya itu. Suami isteri yang akan mendirikan persekutuan komanditer dapat membuat perjanjian kawin terlebih dahulu, hal ini dapat dilakukan karena sesuai dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XII/2015 perjanjian kawin dapat dibuat setelah perkawinan.

---

In the establishment of a limited partnership, there are requirements that must be fulfilled by the founder. The founder in this case is an individual who is certainly capable to perform legal acts. Husbands and wives are capable individuals to perform legal acts especially establishing a limited partnership. But there are things that need to be considered if the husband and wife will establish a limited partnership because they are also obey the Law No. 1 Year 1974 about Marriage concerning their community property. Then some issues will arises, how the establishment of limited partnership established by husband and wife without any prenuptial agreement, how the establishment of limited partnership established by husband and wife without any prenuptial agreement if there is a debt in the limited partnership, how the role of a notary if there are husband and wife who will establish a limited partnership. The author examines these issues using normative juridical research method. Husband and wife cannot establish a limited partnership because there are unfulfilled conditions to establish a limited paertnership. Limited partnership is established by 2 (two) people or more. In addition, if there is a debt in a limited partnership then the party that becomes the passive ally involved in the debt. In this case the definition of limited partnership is not fulfilled. The role of notary is very important because the notary must make a notarial deed carefully and do counseling about their notarial deed. Husband and wife who will establish a limited partnership can make the prenuptial agreement in advance, this can be done because in accordance with the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69 / PUU-XII / 2015 that prenuptial agreement can be made after marriage.