Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Peran Gerakan Turki Muda sebagai peletak dasar pembentukan nasionalisme Turki. Metode yang digunakan adalah menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan pustaka, yaitu keseluruhan data yang diperoleh penulis dari studi pustaka berupa buku, artikel ilmiah, dan jurnal terkait. Benih‐benih Nasionalisme yang menyebar ke tanah Arab menyebabkan munculnya nasionalisme pada bangsa Arab. Perasaan nasionalisme ini pun dirasakan juga oleh bangsa Turki yang ingin menghidupkan kembali rasa kebanggaan atas kejayaan Imperium Utsmani dahulu yang pernah berkuasa di berbagai kawasan. Terlebih setelah kekalahan telak di Wina memunculkan gerakan-gerakan pembaharuan, khususnya Turki Muda yang lebih beriorientasi ke Barat, yaitu Nasionalisme, Konstitusional dan Sekularis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa gerakan pembaharuan Turki Muda memilki peran sangat besar dalam memunculkan dan menanamkan ide‐ide nasionalisme bangsa Turki.

---

This article aims to illustrate the role of Young Turk Movement as the founder of cornerstone in establishment of Turkey Nationalisme. This article used qualitative method thorugh library approachment, namely the overall of data were obtained by the author from literatures in the form of books, scientific articles, and related journals. The nationalism seeds spread into Arab land that caused emergence of Arab Nationalism. This Nationalism Feeling was also felt by Turks who wanted to revive national pride in the Ottoman Imperium's heyday in ruling several regions. Especially after a crushing defeat in Vienna led reform movements, particularly the Young Turks were more oriented to the West, namely nationalism, Constitutional and secularists. The results showed that the Young Turk reform movement has an enormous role in eliciting and instilling the ideas of nationalism Turkey."

"Abstract:Most analysts agree that Turkey's foreign policy is essentially peaceful, using diplomacy and multilateralism in the resolution of its conflicts with other states. Here, Umut Uzer offers a necessary corrective to this standard analysis by revealing the Kemalist influence in Turkey's state ideology. This defined the identity of the state as Turkish, resulting in responsibilities towards Turks residing beyond its borders, and a more engaged foreign policy that ranged from declarations of support for ethnic kin outside Turkey to outright takeover of territory."

"After the Second World War, Turkey and Egypt were among the most dynamic actors in the Middle East. Their 1950s foreign policies presented a puzzle, however: Turkey's Democrat Party pursued NATO membership and sponsored the pro-Western Baghdad Pact regionally, while Egypt's Free Officers promoted neutralism and pan-Arab alliances. This book asks why: what explains this divergence in a shared historical space? Rethinking foreign policy as an important site for the realisation of nationalist commitments, Abou-El-Fadl finds the answer in the contrasting nation making projects pursued by the two leaderships, each politicised differently through experiences of war, imperialism and underdevelopment. Drawing on untapped Turkish and Arabic sources, and critically engaging with theories of postcolonial nationalism, she emphasises local actors' agency in striving to secure national belonging, sovereignty and progress in the international field. Her analysis sheds light on the contemporary legacies of the decade which cemented Turkey's position in the Western Bloc and Egypt's reputation as Arab leader."