Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"PT Tatarasa Primatama merupakan salah satu distributor di Indonesia yang bergerak di bidang impor dan distribusi berbagai bahan baku obat seperti eksipien dan 'active pharmaceutical ingredients' untuk industri farmasi dalam negeri. Laporan ini disusun bertujuan untuk membandingkan monografi eksipien dekstrosa, fenol, dan pati jagung pada Farmakope Indonesia dengan United States Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, dan European Pharmacopoeia yang umumnya menjadi 'grade' acuan berbagai bahan baku obat yang diimpor sebagai salah satu pertimbangan dalam pengadaan bahan baku obat oleh PT Tatarasa Primatama dalam rangka memenuhi peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. Perbandingan monografi eksipien dekstrosa, fenol, dan pati jagung pada Farmakope Indonesia, United States Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, dan European Pharmacopoeia menunjukkan bahwa monografi dekstrosa dan fenol yang tercantum pada United States Pharmacopoeia lebih mirip dengan Farmakope Indonesia dibandingkan British Pharmacopoeia dan European Pharmacopoeia. Monografi pati jagung yang tercantum pada British Pharmacopoeia dan European Pharmacopoeia lebih mirip dengan Farmakope Indonesia dibandingkan United States Pharmacopoeia.

---

PT Tatarasa Primatama is one of the distributors in Indonesia which is engaged in the import and distribution of various drug raw materials such as excipients and active pharmaceutical ingredients for the domestic pharmaceutical industry. This report was prepared to compare the monographs of dextrose, phenol, and corn starch excipients in the Indonesian Pharmacopoeia with the United States Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, and European Pharmacopoeia which are generally the reference grade for various imported drug raw materials as one of the considerations in the procurement of drug raw materials by PT Tatarasa Primatama to comply with the regulations of the Indonesian Agency of Drug and Food Control. Comparison of the monographs of dextrose, phenol, and corn starch excipients in Indonesian Pharmacopoeia, United States Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, and European Pharmacopoeia showed that the monographs of dextrose and phenol listed in United States Pharmacopoeia were more similar to Indonesian Pharmacopoeia than British Pharmacopoeia and European Pharmacopoeia. Corn starch monographs listed in British Pharmacopoeia and European Pharmacopoeia are more similar to Indonesian Pharmacopoeia than United States Pharmacopoeia."

"Heritage, memory, community archaeology and the politics of the past form the main strands running through the papers in this volume. The authors tackle these subjects from a range of different philosophical perspectives, with many drawing on the experience of recent community, commercial and other projects. Throughout, there is a strong emphasis on both the philosophy of engagement and with its enactment in specific contexts; the essays deal with an interest in the meaning, value and contested nature of the recent past and in the theory and practice of archaeological engagements with that past.Chris Dalglish is a lecturer in archaeology at the University of Glasgow. Contributors: Julia Beaumont, David Bowsher, Terry Brown, Jo Buckberry, Chris Dalglish, James Dixon, Audrey Horning, Robert Isherwood, Robert C Janaway, Melanie Johnson, Siân Jones, Catriona Mackie, Janet Montgomery, Harold Mytum, Michael Nevell, Natasha Powers, Biddy Simpson, Matt Town, Andrew Wilson"

"Studi ini membahas polemik wacana pernikahan dongseongdongbon dalam media koran online di Korea Selatan tahun 1996-2005. Dongseongdongbon (동성동본) adalah konsep bagi orang Korea yang memiliki marga dan klan yang sama. Dalam Undang-undang Sipil Korea pasal 809 ayat 1 dijelaskan bahwa pasangan dongseongdongbon tidak diperbolehkan menikah. Pada tahun 1995, Pengadilan Keluarga Seoul menerima pengaduan dari delapan pasangan dongseongdongbon setelah pendaftaran pernikahan mereka ditolak. Setelah pengaduan diterima, Pengadilan Keluarga Korea mengirimkan gugatan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menyatakan bahwa larangan pernikahan dongseongdongbon tidak sejalan dengan konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi menerima gugatan tersebut dan memprosesnya pada tahun 1996. Sejak saat itu muncul dua kubu berlawanan, yaitu kubu yang ingin menghapus dan kubu yang ingin mempertahankan larangan pernikahan dongseongdongbon. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis wacana kritis terhadap artikel berita dari 3 portal berita Korea pada tahun 1996 - Maret 2005. Ketiga portal berita yang digunakan adalah Chosun Ilbo, Hankook Ilbo, dan Jungang Ilbo. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, diketahui bahwa polemik wacana pernikahan dongseongdongbon disebabkan oleh benturan antara dua ideologi politik demokrasi dengan ideologi budaya tradisional Yurim.

---

This study investigates discourse of dongseongdongbon marriage in Korean newspapers from 1996-2005. Dongseongdongbon (동성동본) is a concept for Koreans who have the same surname and clan. Article 809 section 1 of the Korean Civil Code stated that dongseongdongbon couples are not allowed to marry. In 1995, The Seoul Family Court accepted complaints from eight dongseongdongbon couples after their marriage registration were denied. After the complaint was received, the Korean Family Court sent a lawsuit to the Constitutional Court to declare that the dongseongdongbon marriage prohibition is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court accepted the lawsuit and processed it in 1996. Since then, two opposing sides have emerged, namely those who want to abolish and defend on dongseongdongbon marriage prohibition. This study uses critical discourse analysis methods of 137 news articles from 3 Korean news portals in 1996 - March 2005. The three news portals used are Chosun Ilbo, Hankook Ilbo, and Jungang Ilbo. Based on the research, it is known that the debate about dongseongdongbon marriage was caused by a clash between two democratic political ideologies and Yurim's traditional cultural ideology"