Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara pengalaman buruk masa kecil dan kecenderungan malingering pada partisipan yang merupakan warga binaan di lembaga pemasyarakatan. Penelitian sebelumnya menemukan bahwa terdapat kecenderungan untuk melakukan malingering pada korban yang pernah mengalami kekerasan seksual di masa kecil, karena adanya keuntungan eksternal yang diharapkan. Malingering kerap kali muncul pada warga binaan. Warga binaan juga ditemukan seringkali mengalami pengalaman buruk masa kecil. Partisipan berjumlah 86 warga binaan yang diminta untuk mengisi kuesioner Adverse Childhood Experience International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ) milik WHO (2011) dan Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) milik Smith dan Burger (1997), yang kemudian diolah dengan mengunakan Pearson Correlations. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara pengalaman buruk masa kecil dan kecenderungan malingering pada warga binaan dewasa di Lembaga Pemasyarakan Salemba, Cipinang, dan Cibinong.

---

ABSTRACT
This study is conducted to determine the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and the tendency of malingering among prisoner participants. Previous research found that victims who have experienced childhood sexual abuse have a tendency for malingering, because of the external incentive expected. Malingering often arise on inmates. Inmates also found that often got adverse childhood experiences. 86 inmates were asked to fill Adverse Childhood Experience International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ) made by WHO (2011) and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) made by Smith and Burger (1997). The data were then processed by using Pearson Correlations. The results of the find that there is a significant relationship between adverse childhood experiences and the tendency of malingering among adult inmates at the Lembaga Pemasyarakan Salemba, Cipinang, and Cibinong.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari coaching terhadap malingering. Penelitian ini didasari oleh penemuan sebelumnya bahwa coaching diketahui mampu menurunkan keakuratan diagnosa tes deteksi malingering. Penelitian ini berupa eksperimen dimana partisipan diberikan vignette, kemudian partisipan diminta mengisi Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) milik Smith dan Burger (1997) yang digunakan untuk mengukur malingering. Tujuh puluh mahasiswa psikologi diminta mengisi SIMS dengan instruksi untuk meyakinkan penguji bahwa mereka memiliki gangguan mental agar mereka dapat lolos dari tes deteksi malingering. Sebelum mengisi SIMS, kelompok eksperimen (n = 38) diberikan coaching berupa pemberian informasi mengenai simtom gangguan psikosis dan cara menghindari deteksi malingering, sedangkan kelompok kontrol (n = 32) tidak diberikan coaching dan langsung diminta mengerjakan SIMS. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh dari coaching terhadap malingering, t(40.087) = 2.212, p = .033.

---

ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to examine the effect of coaching on malingering. This study was based on findings that coaching can reduce the accuracy of a malingering detection assessment. This study was an experimental research that use vignette to the subjects, then the subjects were administered Smith and Burger?s (1997) the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) that used to detect malingering. Seventy pschology students were asked to fill out the questionnaire to assure the tester that they suffered mental disorder in order to pass the test. Before they completed the SIMS, the experiment group (n = 38) received coaching which gave them some information about psychosis? symptoms and strategies to avoid the detection of malingering, meanwhile the control group (n = 32) didn?t receive any coaching and directly instructed to complete the SIMS. The results in this study showed that the coaching affected malingering, t(40.087) = 2.212, p = .033.

Abstrak :
The second edition of Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation offers the latest detection tools and techniques for veteran and novice alike. As in its initial incarnation, this practical revision demonstrates how to combine clinical expertise, carefully-gathered data, and the use of actuarial models as well as common sense in making sound evaluations and reducing ambiguous results. And, the book navigates the reader through the many caveats that come with the job, beginning with the scenario that an individual may be malingering despite having an actual brain injury.