Hasil: Terdapat 59 donor hati di RSCM. 3 subjek tidak bisa dihubungi, 1 subjek menolak untuk menjadi subjek penelitian. Kualitas hidup donor hati pada memiliki median domain fisik 69 (44-100), pada doman psikologis 69 (50-94), domain hubungan sosial 65 (44-100) dan domain lingkungan 69 (31-94). Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara kualitas hidup donor hati sintas dan nonsintas pada domain fisik (p=0,466), domain psikologis (p=1,00), domain hubungan social (p=0,77) dan domain lingkungan (p=0,13).
Kesimpulan: Subjek donor transplantasi hati di RSCM memiliki kualitas hidup yang baik. Tidak ada perbedaan bermakna kualitas hidup subjek donor transplantasi hati antara resipien sintas dan non sintas. ......Background: Liver donors are healthy people. The quality of liver transplantation is assessed based on the quality of life of donors and recipients. Evaluation of the quality of life of liver donors with surviving and non-surviving recipients is important for liver transplant centers. Method: Quality of life of liver donors in RSCM was assessed using World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire abbreviated version (WHOQoL-BREF). The quality of life of donors with surviving and non-surviving recipients is compared.
Result: There are 59 liver donors in RSCM. Three subjects could not be contacted, one subject refused to participate in this research. Donors’ Quality of life physical domain median was 69 (44-100), psychological domain median was 69 (50-94), social relation domain median was 65 (44-100), and environmental domain median was 69 (31-94). There were no significant differences between the quality of life of donors with surviving and non-surviving recipient in physical domain (p=0,466), psychological domain (p=1,00), social relation domain (p=0,77), and environmental domain (p=0,13). Conclusion: Liver donors in RSCM have good quality of life. There were no significant differences in quality of life of liver donors between Bedah Digestifsurviving and non-surviving liver recipients.
Introduksi: Relaparotomi dini pascatransplantasi hati donor hidup pada anak kerap dihadapkan pada luaran yang lebih buruk dibandingkan dengan pasien pascatransplantasi hati yang tidak memerlukan relaparotomy dini. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui faktor yang berhubungan dengan relaparotomi dini pascatransplantasi donor hidup pada anak
Metode: Penelitian potong lintang ini melibatkan seluruh resipien anak pascatransplantasi donor hidup di RSCM. Berdasarkan data rekam medis, setiap pasien dinilai skor PELD, lama operasi, jumlah perdarahan intraoperasi, warm ischemic time, dan cold ischemic time. Keempat faktor tersebut kemudian dianalisis hubungannya dengan kejadian relaparotomi dini.
Hasil: Terdapat 50 resipien anak pascatransplantasi donor hidup di RSCM dengan median usia subjek 17 bulan (5-61 bulan). Dari 50 subjek, 14 diantaranya memerlukan relaparotomi pascatransplantasi. Setelah dilakukan analisis, dari keempat faktor yang dinilai, hanya jumlah perdarahan intraoperasi yang bermakna secara statistik berhubungan dengan kejadian relaparotomi (p= 0.014).
Konklusi: Perdarahan intraoperasi merupakan salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi kejadian relaparotomi dini pada pasien anak dengan transplantasi hati donor hidup. Akan tetapi perlu diperhatikan faktor lain seperti power penelitian yang dapat memengaruhi hasil dan masih perlu ditingkatkan pada studi ini.
Introduction: Early relaparotomy post living donor liver transplant in children usually faced with poor outcome compare to liver transplant patient without early relaparotomy. This study aims to identify factors associated with early relaparotomy in children undergone living donor liver transplant.
Methods: This is a cross sectional study including all of the children recipient of living donor liver transplant in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM). Using the medical records, the PELD score, duration of the operation, total intraoperation blood loss, warm ischemic time, and cold ischemic time were measured. All of these factors were analyzed with the incidence of relaparotomy.
Results: Fifty children recipient of living donor liver transplant in RSCM were included in this study. The median age of the subject was 17 months old (5-61 months old). From 50 subjects, 14 of them were undergone relaparotomy post liver transplant. The total intraoperation blood loss has statistically significant associated with the incidence of relaparotomy (p= 0.014)
Conclusion: Intraoperation blood loss is one of the factors associated with the incidence of relaporotomy in children recipient of living donor liver transplant. Other factors associated with early relaparotomy still need to be explored to improve the power of this study.