Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Raja Willem-Alexander dari kerajaan Belanda melakukan tiga kunjungan kenegaraan pada tahun 2022 ke Austria, Swedia, dan Yunani. Pada kunjungan tersebut dilakukan jamuan kenegaraan, dan terdapat pidato kenegaraan sebagai bentuk komunikasi formal dalam rangkaian acaranya. Dalam pembukaan pidato tersebut, ditemukan adanya penggunaan strategi kesantunan berbahasa. Penelitian ini membahas bagaimana penggunaan strategi kesantunan positif, strategi kesantunan negatif, serta strategi kesantunan mana yang paling dominan digunakan oleh Raja Willem-Alexander dalam pembukaan pidato pada jamuan kenegaraan saat kunjungan kenegaraan tahun 2022. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Raja Willem-Alexander paling banyak menggunakan strategi kesantunan positif dari pada kesantunan negatif. Strategi kesantunan positif yang digunakan seperti menggunakan bahasa yang sama dengan pendengar, memuji dengan metafora, mengakui kepemilikkan atau pencapaian pendengar, serta menunjukkan optimisme hubungan dengan pendengar. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa Raja Willem-Alexander lebih memilih memenuhi kebutuhan pendengar untuk merasa dihargai, dibutuhkan, dan diakui (kesantunan positif), ketimbang untuk mengutamakan atau memberi kebebasan pendengar (kesantunan negatif). ......King Willem-Alexander of the Kingdom of the Netherlands made three state visits in 2022 to Austria, Sweden and Greece. During these visits, state banquets were held, and there was a state speech as a form of formal communication in the series of events. In the opening of the speech, the use of language politeness strategies was found. This research discusses how the use of positive politeness strategies, negative politeness strategies, and which politeness strategies are most dominantly used by King Willem-Alexander in the opening speech at the state banquet during the state visit in 2022. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. The results showed that King Willem-Alexander used more positive politeness strategies than negative politeness. He used positive politeness strategies such as using the same language as the listener, praising with metaphors, recognizing the listener's ownership or achievement, and showing optimism in the relationship with the listener. This shows that King Willem-Alexander prefers to fulfill the listener's need to feel valued, needed, and recognized (positive politeness), rather than to prioritize or give the listener freedom (negative politeness).

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini merupakan kajian pragmatik khususnya mengenai tindak tutur ilokusi yang terdapat dalam buku kumpulan cerpen Robohnya Surau Kami karya A.A. Navis. Tindak tutur ilokusi adalah tindak tutur yang mangandung maksud tertentu dalam penuturannya. Tindak tutur ilokusi dapat diidentifikasi dengan melihat siapa penutur, siapa mitra tutur, kapan dan di mana tindak tutur dilakukan. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut bahasan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tuturan yang mengandung tindak tutur ilokusi yang didialogkan oleh para tokoh dalam teks kumpulan cerpen Robohnya Surau Kami. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Data diperoleh dengan membaca secara rinci lalu dicatat kemudian dideskripsikan ke dalam pembahasan penelitian. Analisis data mengenai jenis tindak tutur ilokusi penelitian ini akan berlandaskan pada teori tindak tutur ilokusi menurut Searle (1969) yang membagi tindak tutur ilokusi ke dalam lima bagian, yaitu asertif, direktif, komisif, ekspresif, dan deklaratif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jenis tindak tutur ilokusi yang terdapat dalam teks kumpulan cerpen Robohnya Surau Kami yaitu: ilokusi asertif, direktif, komisif, ekspresif, dan deklaratif. Bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi yang paling dominan adalah ilokusi asertif. ......This research is a study of pragmatics, especially regarding illocutionary speech acts contained in the short story collection book Robohnya Surau Kami by A.A. Navis. Illocutionary speech acts are speech acts that contain certain intentions in their speech. Illocutionary speech acts can be identified by looking at who is the speaker, who is the speech partner, when and where the speech act is performed. In this regard, the topic used in this research is the speech that contains illocutionary speech acts dialogued by the characters in the text of Robohnya Surau Kami short story collection. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method. The data is obtained by reading in detail and then recorded and then described into the discussion of the research. Data analysis regarding the types of illocutionary speech acts in this study will be based on the theory of illocutionary speech acts according to Searle (1969) which divides illocutionary speech acts into 5 parts, namely assertive, directive, commisive, expresive, and declarative. The results show that the forms of illocutionary speech acts contained in the text of Robohnya Surau Kami short story collection are: assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative illocution. The most dominant form of illocutionary speech acts is assertive illocution.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas perbandingan kalimat interogatif tertutup pada bahasa Korea dan bahasa Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan persamaan dan perbedaan karakteristik morfosintaksis dari kalimat interogatif tertutup dalam bahasa Korea dan bahasa Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode perbandingan dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa perbedaan dan persamaan. Pertama, terdapat perbedaan pada penanda kalimat interogatif tertutup di kedua bahasa. Bahasa Korea memiliki penanda berupa akhiran kalimat interogatif tertutup di akhir kalimat dan bukan pada kata tanya, sedangkan dalam bahasa Indonesia penandanya berupa kata tanya ‘apa’ di awal kalimat dan partikel ‘-kah’ di awal, tengah, maupun akhir kalimat. Kedua, dilihat dari struktur kalimatnya terdapat perbedaan dan persamaan. Perbedaannya adalah subjek berupa kata ganti orang kedua dalam bahasa Korea dapat dieliminasi, sedangkan di bahasa Indonesia subjek harus tetap digunakan. Persamaannya terletak pada struktur kalimat predikat yang merupakan unsur wajib dan keberadaan objek yang tergantung pada jenis verba sebagai predikat. Ketiga, bentuk negasi pada kalimat interogatif tertutup bahasa Korea memiliki bentuk negasi yang lebih bervariasi dibandingkan bahasa Indonesia. ......This study discusses the comparison of closed interrogative sentences in Korean and Indonesian. The purpose of this study was to describe the similarities and differences in the morphosyntactic characteristics of closed interrogative sentences in Korean and Indonesian. The method used is descriptive qualitative with literature review and contrastive analysis. The results showed that there were differences and similarities. First, there is a difference in both languages’ closed interrogative sentence markers. In Korean the marker is the closed interrogative sentence ending at the end of a sentence and not a question word, while in Indonesian the marker is the question word 'apa' at the beginning of the sentence and the particle '-kah' at the beginning, the middle, or the end of the sentence. Second, judging from the sentence structure there are differences and similarities. The difference is that the subject of the second person pronoun in Korean can be eliminated, while in Indonesian the subject must be used. The similarities are that in the sentence structure the predicate is a mandatory element and the existence of the object depends on the type of verb as predicate. Third, the form of negation in Korean has more varied forms than Indonesian.

Abstrak :
Though natural language processing has come far in the past twenty years, the technology has not achieved a major impact on society. Is this because of some fundamental limitation that cannot be overcome? Or because there has not been enough time to refine and apply theoretical work already done? Editors Madeleine Bates and Ralph Weischedel believe it is neither; they feel that several critical issues have never been adequately addressed in either theoretical or applied work, and they have invited capable researchers in the field to do that in Challenges in Natural Language Processing.

Abstrak :
This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 15th and 16th International Conference on Formal Grammar 2010 and 2011,collocated with the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information in July 2010/2011. The 19 revised full papers were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 50 submissions. The papers papers deal with the following topics: formal and computational phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics, model-theoretic and proof-theoretic methods in linguistics, logical aspects of linguistic structure, constraint-based and resource-sensitive approaches to grammar, learnability of formal grammar, integration of stochastic and symbolic models of grammar, foundational, methodological and architectural issues in grammar, and mathematical foundations of statistical approaches to linguistic analysis.

Abstrak :
The realization that signed languages are true languages is one of the great discoveries of the last thirty years of linguistic research. The work of many sign language researchers has revealed deep similarities between signed and spoken languages in their structure, acquisition, and processing, as well as differences arising from the differing articulatory and perceptual constraints under which signed languages are used and learned. This book provides a crosslinguistic examination of the properties of many signed languages, including detailed case studies of American, Hong Kong, British, Mexican, and German Sign Languages. The contributions to this volume, by some of the most prominent researchers in the field, focus on a single question: to what extent is linguistic structure influenced by the modality of language? Their answers offer particular insights into the factors that shape the nature of language and contribute to our understanding of why languages are organized as they are.