Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum dalam hal pengalihan harta warisan yang belum dibagi tanpa persetujuan ahli waris lainnya. Fokus penelitian adalah mengetahui harta warisan sebagai suatu hak milik bersama yang terikat dan melihat apakah perbuatan tergugat sebagai istri dari pewaris yang mengalihkan lima bangunan rumah tanpa persetujuan ahli waris lain adalah perbuatan melawan hukum, dan kemudian mengelaborasi dua fokus di atas untuk melihat apakah putusan hakim telah tepat dilihat dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan teori-teori hukum yang ada. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Penulisan skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan tergugat yang megalihkan hak milik bersama yang terikay merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum, namun mengenai jumlah pemberian ganti rugi yang harus diberikan oleh tergugat kepada penggugat kurang tepat karena apabila tergugat membayar ganti rugi kepada penggugat, tergugat seolah kehilangan haknya terhadap lima bangunan atau rumah tersebut.

---

This research discusses about the tortious act on the transfer of the inheritance which have not been divided without the consent of the other beneficiaries. The focus of this research is to conversant with inheritance as the property of several persons which bonded and to conclude whether that the defendant act as the beneficiary which transferring five houses without any consent of the other beneficiaries is a tortious act, and then elaborate the two focuses above to look upon the Judge Decision is correct from the existed law regulation and the law theories. Juridical normative is used as the method of the research. This essay, written with literature research with secondary data as the resources of the data. The results of the research shows that the Defendant?s act which transferring the inheritance of several persons which bonded is a tortious act. However, regarding the amount of compensation which has to be given by the Defendant to the Plaintiff is inappropriate since if the Defendant paid the compensation to the Plaintiff, the Defendant make as if the Defendant looses the rights of the five houses.

Abstrak :
Pendaftaran perjanjian perkawinan kepada Kantor Urusan Agama atau Kantor Catatan Sipil diperlukan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan menjamin keberlakuan perjanjian perkawinan bagi para pihak yang membuat perjanjian perkawinan serta pihak ketiga diluar para pihak khususnya dalam hal pembagian harta perkawinan ketika perkawinan berakhir dengan perceraian. Hal ini bertujuan agar pembagian harta perkawinan pasca perceraian dapat dibagi sesuai dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam perjanjian kawin, Undang-Undang No 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (UUP) Pasal 29 serta Pasal 35. Tulisan ini mengambil studi kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Nomor 0502/PDT.G/2013/PA JS. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan Tidak didaftarkannya suatu perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung berakibat tidak berlakunya perjanjian perkawinan bagi pihak ketiga, lebih dari itu terdapat pakar yang menyatakan apabila tidak didaftarkan perjanjian perkawinan maka perjanjian tersebut batal, mengingat ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan Pasal 29 menyatakan suatu perjanjian perkawinan harus disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan, setelah mana isinya berlaku juga terhadap pihak ketiga sepanjang pihak ketiga tersangkut. Perjanjian Perkawinan yang terdapat dalam kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Nomor 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS seharusnya dinyatakan tidak sah karena memuat pengaturan dalam Pasal 1 nya yang melanggar ketentuan dalam asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian. Pembagian harta perkawinan dalam kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan Nomor 0502/Pdt.G/2013/PA JS seharusnya dibagi berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Perkawinan Jis Pasal 96 dan Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Saran yang dapat disampaikan adalah Pembuatan Perjanjian Perkawinan harus mematuhi ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan Pasal 29 dan juga Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata serta isi dari perjanjian perkawinan harus berdasarkan asas-asas umum perjanjian dan peraturan yang mengatur mengenai perjanjian perkawinan. ......The registration of marital agreement at the office of religion affairs or the office of civil registry is required to provide legal certainty and ensure the validity of the marital agreement for the parties involved and third parties outside of the parties, especially in terms of the division of marital assets when the marriage ended by divorce. It is intended that the division of marital assets after divorce can be divided in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the marital agreement, Article 29 and Article 35 Law No. 1 year 1974 on Marriage. The object of this research is a case study of South Jakarta Religion Court Decision No. 0502/PDT.G/2013/PA JS. The method used in this research is normative juridical research using secondary data. This research concluded that any registration of a marital agreement after the marriage resulting invalidity of the marital agreement for the third parties, beyond that there are experts who claim that if the marital agreement has not been registered, the marital agreement become void,given the requirment of law No. 1 of 1974 on marriage Article 29, that states a marriage settlement must be approved by the office regilion affairs officer, after has it registration, it will "apply" to the third party.The marital agreement contained in the case of South Jakarta Religion Court Decision No. 0502/ PDT.G/ 2013/ PA JS should be declared invalid due to the Article 1 of its agreement which is violate the provisions of the balance principle in the agreement. The division of marital assets in the case of South Jakarta Religion Court Decision Nomor 0502/PDT.G/2013/PA JS should be shared based on Article 35 of the Marriage Act Jis Article 96 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. Suggestions for this case are the prosces of establishing a marital agreement must comply with the provisions on Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage Article 29 and also The Indonesian Book of the Civil Law and the contents in the marital agreement should be based on the general principles of agreement and regulation concerning the marital agreement.

Abstrak :
Tesis ini membahas perihal ahli waris terjadi karena adanya hubungan perkawinan dan karena adanya hubungan darah. Ahli waris karena adanya hubungan darah dalam hal ini adalah anak-anak yang dilahirkan dalam perkawinan. Dalam tesis ini penulis memfokuskan pada hak mewaris anak luar kawin, dimana anak luar kawin berbeda kedudukannya dengan anak sah dimata hukum menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Dalam kenyataannya dimana anak luar kawin hanya mempunyai hubungan hukum dengan ibunya dan keluarga ibunya. Sasaran penulis dalam tesis ini adalah apakah anak luar kawin mempunyai hak untuk mewaris atas harta peninggalan orang tuanya sendiri (ayahnya) dan tindakan apa yang dilakukan seorang Notaris/PPAT untuk membantu agar harta peninggalan tersebut dapat dimiliki oleh isteri dan anak luar kawin yang ditinggalkan oleh si Pewaris. Semoga Tesis ini dapat menjadi bacaan bermanfaat dan menambah wawasan bagi pembacanya. ......This thesis discusses the subject is due to the heirs of the marriage relationship and because of blood ties. Heirs of blood relationship in this case are the children who are born within marriage. In this thesis the author focuses on the inherited rights of the child outside of marriage, where the child outside of marriage different from his position with a legitimate child before the law, according to Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Book of Civil Law Act. In fact, where a child outside of marriage has only a legal relationship with her mother and her family. Target the author in this thesis is whether the child has the right to marry outside the inherited legacy of his own parents (his father) and what action is undertaken by a Notary / PPAT to help make these treasures can be owned by the wife and children outside marriage are left by the heir. Hopefully this thesis can be useful reading and add insight to the readers.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pembagian warisan kepada anak-anak dari perkawinan pertama dimana harta dari perkawinan pertama tersebut belum dibagi tetapi telah dihibahkan kepada isteri dan anak-anak dari perkawinan kedua. Undang-undang pada dasarnya melindungi para ahli waris yaitu dengan memberikan hak menuntut guna untuk memperjuangkan hak warisnya serta memberikan hak atas bagian multak atau legitieme portie terhadap segala pemberian warisan. Undang-undang memberikan waktu selama tiga puluh tahun kepada para ahli waris untuk melakukan pengurusan terhadap harta warisan sejak warisan terbuka. Akan tetapi, jika pengurusan warisan tidak dilakukan sesegera mungkin sejak warisan terbuka, maka akan dimungkinkan terjadi perselisihan mengenai warisan tersebut sebab akan terjadinya pergantian ahli waris dan objek warisan mungkin sudah berpindah tangan. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap hak bagian anak-anak dari perkawinan pertama dan akibat hukum dari pembatalan sertipikat tanah yang telah dihibah yang mana tanah tersebut masih merupakan objek warisan. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama. Hasil penelitian adalah untuk melindungi anak-anak dari perkawinan pertama pewaris, maka istri atau suami yang kedua hanya mendapatkan maksimal 1/4 (seperempat) bagian dari harta peninggalan pewaris. Anak-anak tersebut juga tidak boleh dirugikan sekalipun dengan menggunakan wasiat. Dengan dibatalkannya sertipikat tanah akibat hibah, maka perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan setelah hibah tersebut dianggap tidak pernah dan akan kembali pada keadaan semula sebelum hibah tersebut dilaksanakan. Masyarakat terutama para ahli waris diharapkan sesegera mungkin mengurus hal mengenai warisan sejak warisan terbuka untuk menghindari terjadinya sengketa di kemudian hari. ......This research discusses the distribution of inheritance to children from the first marriage in the event that the assets have not been divided but was bequeathed to spouse and children from second marriage. The law basically protects the heirs. The law gives the heirs the right to bring legal charges in order to fight for their inheritance rights and protects the heirs by giving the right to claim their portion of all inheritance. Furthermore, the law gives the heirs thirty years to administer the inheritance after the death. However, if the management of the inheritance is not carried out promptly after the death, a dispute regarding the inheritance is most likely to occur because there is a possibility to a change of heirs and objects of inheritance may have been transferred. The issues that will be raised in this research are the legal protection of the rights of children from the first marriage and the legal consequences of the cancellation of the certificate of land that has been granted where the land is still an object of inheritance. To answer this problem, a normative legal research method is used that uses secondary data as the main data. The results of the research are to protect children from the first marriage of the heir, according to the law, the second wife or husband will only get a maximum of 1/4 (one-quarter) of the inheritance's estate. Children from the first marriage also may not be aggrieved even by means of a will. With the cancellation of the land certificate as a result of the grant, the legal action taken after the grant is considered never happened and will return to its original state before the grant was implemented. Heirs are expected to manage the deceased’s inheritance as soon as possible to avoid disputes in the future.

Abstrak :
in relation to the family law reforms, islamic countries are essentially divided into three categories divided into three categories. First, the islamic state that was not willing to reform and still treat family law as set forth in the law books based on the schools of law adopted. second, a completely Islamic state that has left the islamic family law and has taken the European civil law. Third, the islamic state that has tried to make a renewal to the islamic family law. according to Tahir Mahmood, there are thirteen aspects of contemporary muslim family law that has experienced renewal. One is the excess property of husband and wife inheritance after distributed to their heirs. Property can be said to exceed the amount of the distribution when the heirs consist of all the prescribed ones. Excess property will be returned to them in accordance with their prescribed shares. In classical Islamic law, if the property still remains after distributed to the prescribed heirs, whereas there are no residuary heirs. In the remaining heirs are only husband and wife , the rest of the property was handed over to the treasury of the state treasury. This paper discusses several Islamic countries that have committed to Family law reforms. They are Egyp that follows Shafi'it school of law, Syria that commits to Hanafit school of law, as wekk as Sudan and Tunisia which are Malikit.

Abstrak :
As one of Asian countries, Indonesia has varied of cultures and religions. This variety affects positive laws in Indonesia, one of them is inheritance law. Indonesia has three inheritance legal systems, that is, adat inheritance law, Islamic inheritance law, and western inheritance law. Adat inheritance law is a norm of local adat community about inheritance. Islamic inheritance law is a norm of inheritance based on al Qur?an (Islamic holy book) and hadis (words, acts, and silence of Prophet Muhammad PBUH). In Indonesia, there are three schools of Islamic inheritance law, that is, Syafi?i?s (patrilineal) system of inheritance law (Imam Syafi?i is the most influenced school for Indonesian people), Hazairin?s (bilateral) system of inheritance law (Hazairin was Profesor at University of Indonesia had different view from Imam Syafi?i), and Compilation of Islamic Law system of inheritance law (Compilation of Islamic Law is Islamic law written by Indonesian ulama and Islamic experts). The last, western inheritance law is a norm of heritage based on Burgerlijk Wetboek as legal product of Dutch government when occupied Indonesia. All three inheritance legal systems are available for Indonesian people. We are able to know the availability of these systems is from legal cases in the courts, civil court and religious court. On the paper will be explained comparison of three systems of inheritance law, legal subject using the system (personality principle), and implementation of the system in the courts.

Abstrak :
Demi melayani kepentingan rakyat dalam memperoleh hak-nya guna tercapainya kepastian hukum, termasuk berkenaan dengan pewarisan, notaris sebagai pejabat umum wajib bersikap jujur, amanah, berhati-hati, dan juga tunduk pada aturan yang berlaku. Pada praktiknya, terdapat beberapa kasus berkenaan dengan notaris yang menunjukkan bahwa notaris tidak menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya dengan sebaik-baiknya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana pengaturan pembuatan akta keterangan hak waris berdasarkan prosedur dalam hukum sebagaimana hukum yang berlaku bagi golongan tionghoa serta bagaimana kewajiban dan tanggung jawab notaris terhadap pembuatan akta keterangan hak waris. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan tipe penelitian bersifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang Penulis gunakan adalah jenis data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder. Penulis menggunakan metode analitis data kualitatif yang dianalisis secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa sebelum membuat Akta keterangan hak waris, notaris harus melakukan kegiatan seperti pengumpulan informasi, fisik dokumen, dan pengecekan legalitas dokumen tersebut. Setelahnya, notaris umumnya mensyaratkan kepada ahli waris untuk membuat akta pernyataan dalam bentuk akta otentik, yang dijadikan acuan notaris untuk membuat akta keterangan hak waris. Dalam kasus yang penulis telaah, notaris melakukan kesalahan dengan kurang berhati-hati dalam membuat Akta Keterangan Hak Waris, sehingga melanggar ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf a UUJN. Atas kesalahannya notaris telah diberikan sanksi administratif oleh Majelis Pemeriksa Wilayah Notaris DKI Jakarta berupa teguran tertulis, namun jika didasarkan pada analisa bahwa atas ketidakhati-hatian yang dilakukan oleh notaris mengakibatkan timbulnya kerugian bagi ahli waris, maka selain pertanggungjawaban administratif, notaris dapat pula dimintai pertanggungjawaban secara perdata.

---

As an effort to serving the public interest in obtaining their rights in order to achieve legal certainty, including with regard to the inheritance, the notary as a public official must continue to uphold the dignity of their position by being honest, trustworthy, cautious, and is also subject to the applicable rules. In practice, there are some cases with regard to the notary, indicating that the notary did not carry out their duties and authorities as well as possible. This study aims to analyze how the regulation regarding the making of Certificate of Inheritance Rights based on the procedures in the law as the law applicable to the groups of Tionghoa as well as how the obligations and responsibilities of the notary in the making of the certificate. The author uses a normative legal research method with a descriptive studies. The type of data used in this study is secondary data with primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The author uses the qualitative analytical method which is analysed deductively. It can be concluded that before formulating the Certificate of Inheritance Rights, the notary must perform several steps such as gathering information verbally, collecting physical documents, and checks on the legality of the document. Afterwards, in general the notary requires the beneficiary to make a Deed of Declaration in the form of an authentic deed, which used as a reference in the making of Certificate of Heirship. In the case that used in this study, the notary made a mistake with less cautious in making the Certificate of Heirship, thus violating the provisions of Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a UUJN. In regard to his mistakes, the notary has given administrative sanction by Majelis Pemeriksa Wilayah Notaris DKI Jakarta in the form of a written warning. However if it is based on the analysis that the mistakes performed by the notary resulted in losses to the heirs, then in addition to administrative accountability, the notary can also be held to civil liability.

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris yang berbeda agama. Dalam penelitian ini, Penulis menganalisis dasar pertimbangan dan peran Hakim dalam pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris yang berbeda agama melalui putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan No. 2554/Pdt.G/2011/PA.JS. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non-Muslim adalah untuk memenuhi rasa keadilan masyarakat, khususnya terhadap ahli waris non-Muslim. Hakim memiliki peranan penting dalam pemberian wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris non-Muslim. Dalam kasus ini, Hakim telah menjalankan perannya sebagai pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman dapat menegakkan hukum dan keadilan berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang Undang Dasar 1945. ......This thesis discusses the "Wasiat Wajibah" provision to the heirs of different religions. In this study, the authors analyze the basic considerations and the role of judges in the "Wasiat Wajibah" provision to the heirs of different religions through the South Jakarta Islamic Court judgement No. 2554/Pdt.G/2011/PA.JS. The results concluded that the "Wasiat Wajibah" provision to the heirs of a non-Muslim is to satisfy the justice of the people, especially the non-Muslim heirs. Judges have an important role in the "Wasiat Wajibah" provision for non-Muslim heirs. In this case, the judge has to perform its role as the executor of judicial power to enforce the law and justice based on Pancasila and the Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.