Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ELC sebagai salah satu kebijakan yang dikeluarkan pemerintah dalam rangka mengupayakan pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pembangunan di Kamboja telah membawa dampak lain yang merugikan masyarakat. Adapun dampak tersebut tergambarkan melalui berkembangnya kasus perampasan tanah yang merugikan mayoritas masyarakat indigenous. Skripsi ini akan melihat salah satu kasus perampasan tanah yang terjadi di Provinsi Pursat pada tahun 2004 yang merupakan tahun dimulainya kasus tersebut. Penelitian dalam skripsi ini menggunakan teori akumulasi melalui perampasan yang dikemukakan oleh David Harvey dan melalui metode kualitatif dengan ragam tinjauan pustaka. Temuan yang didapat dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa selain ELC, lemahnya penerapan Land Law dan kuatnya hubungan kerja sama di antara pemerintah dan pengusaha telah mendukung terjadinya tindak perampasan tanah. Selain itu, terdapat temuan lain mengenai cara perampasan tanah yang dilakukan melalui prosedur yang diawali oleh komodifikasi dan privatisasi lahan, serta pengeluaran populasi pekerja secara paksa yang ilegal dan mengandung unsur kekerasan. ......ELC was one of the policies that were created by the government of Cambodia in hope to boost the countrys economic growth and structural development. Unfortunately, not only those two mentioned before, the presence of ELC also stimulates the act of land grabbing that put the group of indigenous people in danger. This thesis will talk about a land grabbing case that happened in Pursat Province in 2004, which was the year the case started. The study in this thesis was done using David Harveys theory of accumulation by dispossession and qualitative method through literature study. The findings show that other than ELC, the weak implementation of Land Law and the firm patron-client relation between the government and the group of businessmen have supported the existence of land grabbing act. In addition to that, there are another findings about how the land grabbing act was done, which were through commodification and privatization of land followed by the forceful expulsion of peasant populations.

Abstrak :
This study brings a new perspective to a pivotal debate: the causes of the English Revolution. It pinpoints the economic motives behind the opposition to the crown, and shows their connection to the changing mind-set and political transitions of the time. Distinctively, it identifies the radicalism of the mercantile sphere, and the developing claim of 'freedom of trade,' the basis on which parliament challenged the king's fiscal prerogative. Freedom of trade was associated with rights of consent, which were asserted as a guarantee of economic interests, and as a political principle. This informed the constitutional changes pushed through by parliament early in 1641, establishing freedom of trade by parliamentary control of the customs, and giving the assembly an automatic place at the center of affairs, the first requirement of representative government. Crucially, it was not the crown but parliament that appropriated the state interest, through an independent definition of national priorities. As England coalesced into a political and commercial unit, the open and communal patterns of medieval times were overlaid. The land itself came to be perceived and used in a different way. Freedom of trade had an agrarian aspect. An extended class of gentry and yeomanry occupied consolidated farms, displacing the smallholders from the common lands. With intensified marketing, the old moral restraints on trade and property died away. A more exploitative ethic undermined the balance of relationship with the land. The book makes an original connection between the English Revolution and the processes of environmental change"--Provided by publishe