Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengukur dan membandingkan imbal hasil, risiko, dan rating antara sukuk ijarah dengan sukuk mudharabah. Penulis menggunakan 32 sukuk ijarah dan 10 sukuk mudharabah sebagai sampel penelitian. Sukuk-sukuk tersebut tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia sebelum 1 Januari 2017, serta memiliki jatuh tempo setelah 31 Desember 2017. Penulis menggunakan metode Liliefors / Kolmogorov-Smirnov untuk mengukur distribusi normal data. Jika data terdistribusi normal, maka menggunakan uji t dua rata-rata untuk mengukur tingkat perbedaan data tersebut. Jika data tidak terdistribusi normal, penulis menggunakan Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test untuk mengukur tingkat perbedaan dari variabel-variabel tersebut. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian tersebut adalah tingkat imbal hasil dan credit rating sukuk ijarah lebih tinggi daripada sukuk mudharabah, sedangkan tingkat risiko sukuk ijarah lebih rendah daripada sukuk mudharabah.

---

ABSTRACT
The main purpose of this paper is to measure and compare the valuation variables of ijarah sukuk and mudharabah sukuk. Using samples from 42 outstanding sukuk in Indonesia Stock Exchange secondary market of fixed income instrument within 2017. Samples are divided into 2 groups, 32 sukuk ijarah and 10 sukuk mudharabah. Researcher use Liliefors Kolmogorov Smirnov to measure whether datas are distributed normally or not. Then Paired Sample T test and Wicoxon Signed Ranks Test is used to measure the difference between two means. Conclusion is made from hipothesis, which is whether any differences in rate of return, risk rate, and transaction volume between ijarah sukuk and mudharabah sukuk. Conclusion from this research is that rate of return and credit rating of ijarah sukuk is higher than mudharabah sukuk, thus risk rate of ijarah sukuk is lower than mudharabah sukuk.

Abstrak :
The fields of morality and ethics have been left out significantly from socio-scientific study in general and in economics and finance in particular. Yet this book argues that in this age of post-modernist analytical inquiry, the study of morality and ethics is an epistemological requirement. This book illustrates the delimiting nature of mainstream economic reasoning in treating morality and ethics and highlights the potential contribution of analytical monotheism, as typified by the Islamic concept of Tahwid. The principal purpose of this book is to undertake an introductory exploration of the critical area of comparative economic thought in order to place the nature and emergence of ethico-economic theory in its proper context. It is ultimately argued that such a post-orthodoxy revolutionary methodological worldview can be presented by Islamic political economy, Islamic economics and finance.