Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Sebagai salah bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap investor, arbitrase investasi internasional memberikan sarana kepada investor asing untuk mengajukan klaim atas dasar perlindungan-perlindungan substantif yang menjadi hak investor. Dalam perkembangannya, tribunal arbitrase seringkali dihadapkan dengan isu korupsi yang dijadikan argumentasi oleh para pihak untuk menolak yurisdiksi tribunal atau meniadakan klaim pihak lain. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan komplikasi dan ketidakpastian terkait perlindungan investor mengingat sarana terhadap arbitrase merupakan bentuk perlindungan prosedural bagi investor. Sifat dari tindak pidana korupsi yang luas, multi-dimensional dan memiliki sisi pemberi dan penerima juga berperan dalam menambah komplikasi permasalahan ini. Penelitian ini akan membahas komplikasi tersebut serta mengkaji kesiapan hukum investasi Indonesia dalam menghadapi permasalahan tersebut. ......As one of a form of protection toward investors, international investment arbitration provides a way for foreign investor to file a lawsuit based on the substantive protection provided to them as a right. In its development, arbitral tribunal often faced with an issue of corruption that serve as a killing argument against the claim of other parties, this condition has the potential to complicate the issue and create uncertainty towards investor protection in which the international investment arbitration itself serves as a procedural protection of investor. The nature of the corruption which is broad, multi-dimensional, and got supply and demand side in it, furtherly complicate the issue. This study will discuss on this complicated issue and review about the readiness of Indonesian Investment Law to deal with the issue.

Abstrak :

---

ABSTRACT
Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation organizes, summarizes and comments upon the arbitral awards interpreting and applying BIT provisions. Policymakers and practitioners will find a thorough introduction to the operation of the BITs, including the principal arguments and case authorities on both sides of the major issues in international investment law. The book is intended to be a single-volume reference covering every important development in the 50 years of BIT programs worldwide, from 1959 until 2009. Author Kenneth Vandevelde argues that the primary purpose of the BITs is to promote the application of the rule of law to foreign investment, while a secondary purpose is to create a liberal investment regime. He further argues that BITs are based on six core principles: reasonableness, security, nondiscrimination, access, transparency and due process. The book explains each of these principles and analyzes the major BIT provisions based on them. Vandevelde addresses the host of complex questions that BITs engender: Do bilateral investment treaties attract foreign investment or otherwise contribute to economic development? Do BITs limit host state regulatory discretion too much? Why should countries continue to conclude BITs? What is meant by BIT guarantees of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security"? What is the scope of the BIT provision for most-favored-nation treatment? The book's expert analysis of these questions makes it useful to policy makers in the area of international economic relations, attorneys representing multinational companies, and anyone interested in the process of economic globalization.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan police powers doctrine dalam putusan-putusan ICSID. Konsep police powers doctrine berhubungan erat dengan konsep ekspropriasi tidak langsung. Berdasarkan police powers doctrine, tindakan negara yang tergolong dalam lingkup police powers doctrine dan yang menyebabkan kerugian kepada investor, adalah tidak termasuk sebagai ekspropriasi tidak langsung, dan karenanya tidak menimbulkan kewajiban bagi negara untuk membayar kompensasi. Ketiga putusan ICSID yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini telah mengakui police powers doctrine dalam pertimbangan putusannya. Namun, belum ada pemahaman yang jelas dan konsisten berkaitan dengan penerapan dari doktrin ini.
This research is aimed to analyze the practice of police powers doctrine in ICSID awards. The concept of police powers doctrine is closely related to the concept of indirect expropriation. According to the police powers doctrine, a state measure that falls within the state’s police powers resulting in loss of property to the investors does not constitute an indirect expropriation, and, accordingly, does not give rise to an obligation for the state to compensate. The three ICSID awards analyzed in this research have all recognized police powers doctrine in its consideration. However, there is no clear and consistent understanding regarding the implementation of this doctrine.

Abstrak :
A breach of fair and equitable treatment is alleged in almost every investor-state dispute. It has therefore become a controversial norm, which touches many questions at the heart of general international law. Roland Klager sheds light on these controversies by exploring the deeper doctrinal foundations of fair and equitable treatment and reviewing its contentious relationship with the international minimum.