Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Identity politics promoted by the 212 Movement has led to increased intolerance in society. This study captured this problem through the perspective of Emmanuel Levinas Ethics. According to Levinas, the act of intolerance occurs because we see the Other, not with ideas, ideologies, teachings, doctrines, interests, and religion that should be upheld above all things. Our attachment to the ideas we has about others often makes us fail to treat them as humans because we are prevented from encountering them directly. For this reason, this study aims to find out the negative consequences caused by the 212 Movement through the philosophical perspective of Emmanuel Levinas ethics. With descriptive methods, literature study, and a qualitative approach, the results of the study showed that identity politics carried out by the 212 Movement could not be justified in ethical relations. The 212 Movement saw other human beings as objects that can be used to achieve their personal or group goals. The movement has controlled and exploited their fellow believers, and not reluctant to carry out hateful propaganda to people outside their group. Levinas ethical relations open a new type of relations that are different from idea-based relations. Encountering others makes us realize that they are not merely skin, flesh, and blood that can be destroyed just like that.

Abstrak :
Studi kuantitatif ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran moderasi sel-esteem dalam hubungan antara religiusitas dengan intoleransi politik. Peneliti menduga bahwa orang religius yang memiliki tingkat self-esteem rendah cenderung menunjukkan intoleransi politik yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan orang religius yang memiliki tingkat self esteem tinggi. Partisipan penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah 308 orang yang beragama Islam di sekitar JAbodetabek dan sudah memiliki hak politik atau setidaknya sudah mendapat hak pilih dalam pemilu. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah Skala Intoleransi Politik oleh Pepinsky, dkk (2018) untuk mengukur intoleransi politik, Skala Religiusitas Komitmen Worthington 2003 untuk mengukur religiusitas, dan self-esteem diukur melalui Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale 1965. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efek individual religiusitas dan self esteem mampu memprediksi secara signifikan terhadap intoleransi politik. Selanjutnya, analisis moderasi menunjukkan bahwa self esteem tidak damapt memberikan efek moderasi yang signifikan bagi hubungan religiuistas dengan intoleransi politik.

---

This quantitative study was aims to determine the moderating role of self-esteem in the relationship between religiosity and political intolerance. It was hypothesized that religious people who have a low level of self-esteem tend to show higher political intolerance than religious people who have a high level of self-esteem. The research participants of this study were 308 Muslim around Jabodetabek and already had political rights at least had been given the right to vote in national elections. Political intolerance was measured by Scale of Political Intolerance which developed by Pepinsky, et al. 2018, religiosity was measured by the Scale of Religiosity Commitment by Worthington 2003, and self-esteem was measured by Rosenberg Self esteem Scale 1965. The results of this study indicate that the individual effects of religiosity and self esteem able to predict political intolerance significantly. Furthermore, moderation analysis shows that self esteem cannot provide a significant moderating effect for the relationship of religiosity with political intolerance.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Diare telah menjadi salah satu penyebab meningkatnya kesakitan dan kematian pada anak. Diare biasanya disebabkan oleh infeksi. Sindrom Malabsorpsi dan beberapa enteropatogen bisa menyebabkan diare. Studi ini dilaksanakan untuk mencari prevalensi malabsorpsi laktosa dan malnutrisi pada pasien anak dengan diare dan mencari asosiasi malabsorpsi laktosa dan malnutrisi. Studi ini menggunakan studi potong lintang dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Jenis studi ini dipilih untuk mengetahui asosiasi malabsorpsi laktosa dan malnutrisi. Data yang dibutuhkan akan diperoleh dari profil analisis tinja dan rekam medis pasien anak yang dirawat di RSCM. Penelitian ini menemukan prevalensi malabsorpsi laktosa di pasien anak dengan diare sebanyak 18,2 . Prevalensi malnutrisi di pasien anak dengan diare sebanyak 38 . Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa tidak terdapat asosiasi malabsorpsi laktosa dengan status nutrisi p>0.05 . Perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai asosiasi malabsorpsi laktosa dan malnutrisi dengan sampel yang lebih besar.

---

ABSTRACT
Diarrhea remains as a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in Indonesia. Diarrhea in children is usually caused by infection . However, numerous disorders could also result in diarrhea. It includes a malabsorption syndrome and various enteropathies. The study that we conduct is aimed to determine the prevalence of lactose malabsorption and malnutrition in pediatric patients with diarrhea and the association between lactose malabsorption. and malnutrition. The research design used for this study is a cross sectional using secondary data. This study is chosen to know the association between lactose malabsorption and malnutrition. The data in this study will be obtained from stool analysis profile and the medical record of pediatric patients that are treated in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital RSCM . This study found that the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in pediatric patients with diarrhea is 18.2 . This study also found that the prevalence of malnutrition is 38 .Moreover, the result of the study revealed that there is no association between lactose malabsorption and nutritional status P 0.05 . A further study is required to explored the association between lactose malabsorption and nutritional status with larger sample size