Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
This study is aimed to explore a construction in Indonesian that contains clause relations linked without any conjunction. The construction is traditionally called asyndetic construction. The discussions about clause relations in Indonesian have been generally emphasized on the use of conjunctions as clause relation markers. Some grammarians have actually also discussed the use of asyndetic construction in Indonesian, such as Mees (1949), Fokker (1951), Lapoliwa (1999), Kridalaksana (l985 and 1999), and Baryadi (2000). However, the discussions were only some parts of the wider topics. It should also be noted that the term of asyndetic construction has not been sharpened during the discussions. This study, therefore, is expected to sharpen the concept. By applying the Systemic Functional Grammar by Halliday (1994), which underlies the theoretical framework of this study, this study is focused on three discussions- Those are (i) the features of asyndetic construction in Indonesian, (ii) the production rules of asyndetic construction, and (ii) the relation between the use of asyndetic construction and certain language styles, especially journalistic style, which productively use the construction. As the lindings of this study, related to the features of the asyndetic construction, it is found that there are three types of asyndetic construction in Indonesian, which are (i) paratactic-asyndetic construction, (ii) hypotactic-asyndetic construction, and (iii) embedded-asyndetic construction. There are two main rules of the construction production, namely the clause joining and the logical meaning of clause relations. The clause joining shows a strategy of asyndetic construction forming based on the syntactical core functions. The logical meaning of clause relations shows a strategy of clause relation composing between main clause and main clause, dependent clause and dependent clause, and embedded clause and nominal group. Concerning the features of asyndetic construction in Indonesian, the paratactic-asyndetic construction is formed by three ways, which are linking, juxtaposition, and juxtaposition-linking. The hypotactic-asyndetic construction is formed by subordination. The embedded-asyndetic construction is formed by rank-shifting. Meanwhile, the logical meaning of clause relations can also be identified. The logical meanings of clause relations in paratactic-asyndetic construction are divided into two groups, which are expansion and projection. The expansion can be divided into (i) elaboration, which covers exposition, exemplitication, and clarification, (ii) extension, which covers addition and polar alternation, and (iii) enhancement, which covers temporal, causal, and conditional relations. The projection can be divided into locution and idea projection. The logical meanings of clause relations in hypotactic-asyndetic construction are also divided into two groups, which are expansion and projection. The expansion is only found in the form of enhancement, which covers temporal, causal, manner, purposive, conditional, and concessive relations. The projection covers both locution and idea projection. The logical meanings of clause relations in embedded-asyndetic construction are divided into expansion an projection. The expansion can be divided into elaboration, which is only found in the fonn exemplification, and enhancement, which is only in the form of purposive relation. The projection is only in the form of idea proj ection, which covers sense and cognition relations. Related to the language style, this study explores data that is not limited to a certain style. The large ntunber of data obtained from joumalistic style, especially hom printed mass media, shows at least that the asyndetic construction becomes one of the special characteristics of the journalistic style. The high frequency of the construction use in the journalistic style is mainly caused by literal translation, e.g. literal translation from participial construction in English, as the source language, into hypotactic-asyndetic construction in Indonesian, as the target language.

Abstrak :
Konstruksi-dengan dapat berupa konstruksi frasal dan klausal. Dalam konstruksi frasal, dengan adalah preposisi, sedangkan dalam konstruksi klausal, dengan adalah konjungsi. Sebagai konjungsi, dengan selalu terdapat dalam konstruksi subordinatif (klausa subordinatif yang berkonjungsi dengan selanjutnya disebut "klausa-dengan"). Telah sejak lama perhatian para ahli tertuju pada konstruksi, berpreposisi dengan. Tidak demikian halnya dengan konstruksi berkonjungsi atau bersubordinator dengan. Pemerian konstruksi berpreposisi dengan telah tersebar di dalam berbagai tulisan tata bahasa Indonesia (Melayu) baik yang ditulis oleh ahli yang sekaligus sebagai penutur bahasa Indonesia (Melayu) seperti Slametmuijana (1951), Hadidjaja (1985), Sastradiwirja (1960), Sudaryanto (1983), Harimurti Kridalaksana (1986), dan (sejumlah tulisan) Hamian (107Y, 1980, dan 198b); maupun yang ditulis oleh ahli asing seperti De Hollander (1819/1984), Van Wijk (1909/1985), Van Ophuij﷓sen (1910/1983), Alieva (1961/1991), dan Mees (1969). Penyebutan adanya konstruksi bersubordinator dengan ditemukan dalam sejumlah tulisan yang terbatas, yaitu dalam Fokker (1979), Junus (1967), Hamlan (1981a), Moeliono {1988), dan Suwatno (1990/1991). Deskripsi terhadap konstruksi bersubordinator dengan dalam karyakarya ini hanyalah sepintas. Pembahasan pelesapan subjek dalam bahasa Indonesia oleh Suguno (1991) sama sekali tidak menyinggung adanya pelesapan subjek dalam konstruksi berkonjungsi dengan. Pembahasan adverbial cara dan adverbial sarana dalam bahasa Indonesia oleh Sumadinata (1992) terbatas pada konstruksi yang berpreposisi dengan. Berdasarkan fakta-takta yang disebutkan di atas, konstruksi bersubordinator dengan belum memikat perhatian para ahli untuk mendeskripsikan secara lebih mendalam.

Abstrak :
Kita mengetahui bahwa setiap media massa memiliki kecenderungan untuk membuat aturan-aturan bahasa sendiri, baik itu sesuai dengan kaidah bahasa Indonesia atau tidak. Pembuatan aturan-aturan yang berbeda-beda itu merupakan ciri khas sebuah media. Sejauh pembuatan aturan tersebut tidak terlalu menyimpang dari kaidah bahasa Indonesia dan dilakukan dengan konsisten, hal tersebut sah-sah saja.

Abstrak :
Perlulah kiranja isi uraian diatas itu, saja simpulkan disini dalam beberapa kalimat. Istilah wijzers van modaliteit jang dipakai oleh Prof. Gonda untuk menjebut fungsi sedjumlah kata2 tertentu, jang menjatakan modalitet dalam bahasa Indonesia itu, menurut pendapat saja terlalu umum sifatnja. Prpf. A.A. Fokker-pun setjara umum menjebut kata2 penjatakan modalitet itu modale woorde...