Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menyelidiki pengaruh perubahan kebijakan fiskal selamapelaksanaan desentralisasi fiskal terhadap ketimpangan di Indonesia. Denganmenggunakan data panel dari 27 provinsi selama periode 2001-2012, penelitianini menjelaskan dampak dari peraturan baru tentang desentralisasi fiskal terhadapketimpangan pengeluaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan koefisien Gini, Theil L,dan Theil T sebagai ukuran ketimpangan, sedangkan variabel independen meliputiindeks desentralisasi fiskal (FDA dan FDB), PDRB per kapita (pcGRDP) danPDRB per kapita kuadrat (pcGRDP kuadrat). Variabel independen PDRB perkapita dan PDRB per kapita kuadrat berfungsi sebagai variabel kontrol.Hasil regresi panel menunjukkan bahwa selama pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 tahun 1999 (2001-2004), desentralisasi fiskal berdampaknegatif pada ketimpangan. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa desentralisasi fiskalmengakibatkan peningkatan ketimpangan pengeluaran. Semakin besardesentralisasi fiskal menyebabkan semakin besarnya ketimpangan pengeluaran.Perubahan undang-undang desentralisasi fiskal tahun 2004 menunjukkan bahwaketimpangan dapat dikurangi. Meskipun pengaruh desentralisasi fiskal padaketimpangan masih negatif setelah tahun 2004, besar dampaknya jauh lebih kecil.

---

ABSTRACTThis study attempts to investigate the effect of change in fiscal regulationduring implementation of fiscal decentralization on inequality in Indonesia. Usinga provincial panel data set consisting of 27 provinces during 2001-2012 periods,this study explains the impact of new regulation on fiscal decentralization onexpenditure inequality. This study employs Gini coefficient, Theil L, and Theil Tas a measure of inequality, while independent variables include indices of fiscaldecentralization (FDA and FDB), per capita GRDP (pcGRDP) and per capitaGRDP squared (pcGRDP squared). Independent variables, pc GRDP and pcGRDPsquared serve as control variables.The panel regression results show that during the implementation of the lawNo.25/1999 (i.e., from 2001 to 2004), fiscal decentralization has a negative impacton inequality. In particular, this study finds that fiscal decentralization appears tohave increased expenditure inequality. Higher degree of fiscal decentralizationviiUniversitas Indonesiainduces larger expenditure inequality. However, the implementation of the revisedfiscal decentralization law in 2004 seems to have mitigated inequality. Though theeffect of fiscal decentralization on inequality is still negative after 2004, themagnitude of the effect is much smaller.;This study attempts to investigate the effect of change in fiscal regulationduring implementation of fiscal decentralization on inequality in Indonesia. Usinga provincial panel data set consisting of 27 provinces during 2001-2012 periods,this study explains the impact of new regulation on fiscal decentralization onexpenditure inequality. This study employs Gini coefficient, Theil L, and Theil Tas a measure of inequality, while independent variables include indices of fiscaldecentralization (FDA and FDB), per capita GRDP (pcGRDP) and per capitaGRDP squared (pcGRDP squared). Independent variables, pc GRDP and pcGRDPsquared serve as control variables.The panel regression results show that during the implementation of the lawNo.25/1999 (i.e., from 2001 to 2004), fiscal decentralization has a negative impacton inequality. In particular, this study finds that fiscal decentralization appears tohave increased expenditure inequality. Higher degree of fiscal decentralizationviiUniversitas Indonesiainduces larger expenditure inequality. However, the implementation of the revisedfiscal decentralization law in 2004 seems to have mitigated inequality. Though theeffect of fiscal decentralization on inequality is still negative after 2004, themagnitude of the effect is much smaller.;This study attempts to investigate the effect of change in fiscal regulationduring implementation of fiscal decentralization on inequality in Indonesia. Usinga provincial panel data set consisting of 27 provinces during 2001-2012 periods,this study explains the impact of new regulation on fiscal decentralization onexpenditure inequality. This study employs Gini coefficient, Theil L, and Theil Tas a measure of inequality, while independent variables include indices of fiscaldecentralization (FDA and FDB), per capita GRDP (pcGRDP) and per capitaGRDP squared (pcGRDP squared). Independent variables, pc GRDP and pcGRDPsquared serve as control variables.The panel regression results show that during the implementation of the lawNo.25/1999 (i.e., from 2001 to 2004), fiscal decentralization has a negative impacton inequality. In particular, this study finds that fiscal decentralization appears tohave increased expenditure inequality. Higher degree of fiscal decentralizationviiUniversitas Indonesiainduces larger expenditure inequality. However, the implementation of the revisedfiscal decentralization law in 2004 seems to have mitigated inequality. Though theeffect of fiscal decentralization on inequality is still negative after 2004, themagnitude of the effect is much smaller., This study attempts to investigate the effect of change in fiscal regulationduring implementation of fiscal decentralization on inequality in Indonesia. Usinga provincial panel data set consisting of 27 provinces during 2001-2012 periods,this study explains the impact of new regulation on fiscal decentralization onexpenditure inequality. This study employs Gini coefficient, Theil L, and Theil Tas a measure of inequality, while independent variables include indices of fiscaldecentralization (FDA and FDB), per capita GRDP (pcGRDP) and per capitaGRDP squared (pcGRDP squared). Independent variables, pc GRDP and pcGRDPsquared serve as control variables.The panel regression results show that during the implementation of the lawNo.25/1999 (i.e., from 2001 to 2004), fiscal decentralization has a negative impacton inequality. In particular, this study finds that fiscal decentralization appears tohave increased expenditure inequality. Higher degree of fiscal decentralizationviiUniversitas Indonesiainduces larger expenditure inequality. However, the implementation of the revisedfiscal decentralization law in 2004 seems to have mitigated inequality. Though theeffect of fiscal decentralization on inequality is still negative after 2004, themagnitude of the effect is much smaller.]"

"ABSTRAKLaporan magang ini membahas mengenai perlakuan akuntansi akun beban bunga pada Bank THB serta prosedur audit yang dilakukan KAP XYZ terhadap Bank THB, khususnya untuk akun beban bunga. Laporan ini membahas akun beban bunga Bank THB untuk tahun buku yang berakhir pada 31 Desember 2017. Standar akuntansi yang digunakan adalah Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan PSAK mengenai instrumen keuangan yang terdapat pada PSAK 50 dan PSAK 55. Prosedur audit yang dilakukan KAP XYZ dimulai dari tahap penerimaan klien, perencanaan, pengujian dan pengumpulan bukti hingga penyelesaian dan pelaporan. Standar audit yang digunakan adalah Pedoman Audit XYZ yang mengacu pada International Standards on Auditing ISA . Terdapat temuan terkait pemberian otorisasi pada pengujian pengendalian yang tidak material, namun secara keseluruhan, berdasarkan hasil dari proses pengauditan tidak ada salah saji yang material dan laporan keuangan mendapat opini wajar tanpa pengecualian. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, perlakuan akuntansi dan prosedur audit yang dijalankan telah sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku.

---

ABSTRACTThis internship report discusses the accounting treatment of interest expense account in Bank THB as well as the audit procedures performed by KAP XYZ against Bank THB, especially for interest expense account. This report discusses the interest expense account of Bank THB for the period ended in 31 December 2017. The accounting standards used are Statements of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS for financial instruments, SFAS 50 and SFAS 55. Audit procedures performed by KAP XYZ started from client acceptance, planning, testing and evidence collection, until completion and reporting. The audit standard used is the XYZ Audit Guide which refers to the International Standards on Auditing ISA . From the test of control, KAP XYZ found that there is minor issue related to authorization. However, based on the overall result of the auditing process, there is no material misstatement and the financial statement gets an unqualified opinion. Based on the analysis, accounting treatment and audit procedures are in accordance with applicable standards."

"ABSTRAKLaporan magang ini membahas mengenai prosedur audit atas akun pendapatan iuran dan beban klaim ABCD Ketenagakerjaan cabang B05, untuk periode 31 Desember 2014. Laporan ini membahas mengenai prosedur audit yang dijalankan, tahapan - tahapan audit, beserta hasil pelaksanaan audit, temuan audit, serta kesesuaian prosedur - prosedur audit tersebut dengan teori audit. Proses yang dijalankan dalam audit ini mencakup test of controls, serta substantive test of transactions, yang dilaksanakan kepada seluruh program kerja ABCD Ketenagakerjaan cabang B05. Berdasarkan pelaksanaan audit, auditor memperoleh keyakinan yang cukup bahwa akun pendapatan iuran dan beban klaim ABCD Ketenagakerjaan cabang B05 sudah disajikan secara wajar dan bebas dari salah saji material.

---

ABSTRAK

This report aims to explain the audit procedures for the contribution revenue and claim expenses of ABCD Ketenagakerjaan's B05 branch, for the period ended December 31st, 2014. This report mainly discusses about the processes undertaken during the audit and its conformity with the audit theories, the result of the audit, and also the issues found upon completing the audit. The processes undertaken include test of controls, and also substantive test of transactions, both of which are performed across all ABCD Ketenagakerjaan's work program. Based on the audit procedures performed, auditor achieved enough evidence to assure that the contribution revenue and claim expenses of ABCKetenagakerjaan?s B05 branch have been fairly presented, and are free from any material misstatements."

"ABSTRAKLaporan magang ini membahas mengenai prosedur audit akun pendapatan dan beban lain-lain pada PT XYZ sebagai maskapai penerbangan nasional. Perusahaan ini memberikan jasa penyewaan helikopter, jasa teknisi dan pilot serta jasa perawatan helikopter. Helikopter merupakan salah satu aset utama perusahaan dan aset tersebut didapatkan dari sewa pembiayaan. Perlakuan akuntansi transaksi sewa pembiayaan diatur dalam PSAK 30 berikut dengan peraturan mengenai ketentuan transaksi jual dan sewa kembali. Transaksi jual dan sewa kembali berpotensi terhadap adanya pengakuan keuntungan atau kerugian bagi perusahaan, dan adanya biaya sewa dan beban bunga yang termasuk dalam akun pendapatan dan beban lain-lain. Audit yang dilakukan mencakup prosedur analitis, pengujian subtantif dan pengujian rincian nilai saldo dengan melakukan perhitungan kembali beban bunga dan jurnal transaksi mata uang asing. Berdasarkan analisis, prosedur audit yang dilakukan KAP LMN sudah sesuai dengan teori dan stadar audit yang berlaku. Namun terdapat ketidaksesuaian penerapan akuntansi pedapatan dan beban lain-lain yang dilakukan PT XYZ dengan standar akuntansi di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThis internship reports explain audit procedure for other income and expense in PT XYZ as national aviation company. This company running its business with provide helicopter charter services, pilot and engineer services, and helicopter maintenance services. Helicopter is one of the main asset for company and this asset is obtained from finance lease. Accounting treatment for leasing is referred to PSAK 30 which also regulates accounting treatment for sale and lease back transaction. Company potentially recognize gain or loss and record payment of interest leasing periodically from that transaction as other income and expenses.The audit has included analytical procedure, substantive test, and test of detail balance by recalculate interest expense and test of journal foreign exchange. Base on analysis, the audit conducted by public accounting firm have complied in accordance with theory and the applicable standards. However, there are some accounting implementation on other income and expenses that not complied with applicable standards in Indonesia. "