Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The economic crisis that stroked Indonesia in 1997 paralyzed the nation's economics. The crisis is marked with decrease of public trust to rupiah currency resulting in the drop of rupiah exchange rate, weakened public purchase power, halt of production, and many others. Many companies operating in Indonesia, whether private or government-owned (perusahaan milik Negara/BUMN) had difficult times. These companies were forced to reduce their employees, and sometimes termination of employment became the only option to solve the problem. PT. Dirgantara Indonesia is one sample among many others that experienced these in Indonesia. The PHK process started in 11 July 2003. President Director of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia issued Decree of Board of Directors of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia No. SKEP/0598/030.20/PTD/UT0000/07/03 regarding Lay Off Program of PT. DI?s Employees, under which 9,600 employees were laid off. This Decree was issued without any prior notice to or socialization among the employees. Even, when the Decree was issued, there was actually ongoing discussions over a Collective Labor Agreement (Kesepakatan Kerja Bersama / KKB) by both parties teams. Point 5 of the Decree of the Board of Directors of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia No:SKEP/0598/030.02/PTD/UT0000/07/03 explicitly stated that: "During the lay off period, the employees may not enter into the Company's premises". Based on this, the Decree was basically more than a mere lay off but rather a lock out which might have led to termination of employment. As such, there are 2 (two) matters that will be discussed in this thesis, namely: 1. Legal analysis regarding Decree of Board of Directors of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia No. SKEP/0598/030.20/PTD/UT0000/07/03 regarding Lay Off Program of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia?s Employees, which caused termination of 6,561 employees of PT. Dirgantara Indonesia; 2. Legal analysis on the legal protection of employees? rights following decision of the Central Committee of Employment Disputes Settlement (Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Pusat/P4P) Number 142/03/02-8/X/PHK/1-2004 dated 29 January 2004 regarding termination of 6,561 employees of ..."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai hak-hak pekerja/buruh akibat pemutusan hubungan kerja dan perlindungan terhadap hak pekerja/buruh dalam putusan pailit. Penulisan ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, karena menggambarkan hak-hak pekerja/buruh akibat perusahaan paillit dan menganalisis hak-hak pekerja/buruh dikaitkan dengan ketentuan yang ada dalam Undang-Undang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode analsis kualitatif yaitu menganalisis aturan yang jelas berdasarkan keterangan ahli dan perlindungan terhadap hak pekerja/buruh akibat putusan pailit. Penelitian ini menganalisis putusan yaitu tanggapan kurator dan pertimbangan hakim dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai ketentuan hak pekerja/buruh akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja/buruh dalam putusan no. 31/Pdt.Sus/Pailit/2014. Perlindungan terhadap hak pekerja/buruh akibat pemutusan hubungan kerja yang ketentuannya terdapat dalam Pasal 95 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan sudah cukup melindungi hak pekerja/buruh. Akan tetapi, perlindungan terhadap pekerja/buruh dalam putusan no. 31/Pdt.Sus/Pailit/2014 belum sepenuhnya melindungi hak pekerja/buruh karena hak-hak upah para pekerja/buruh tidak terpenuhi.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis about the protection of labour rights the concequence termination of employment and the protection of labour rights on cases of bankcrupt. This research is analytis description, because describe about labour rights based on laws. This research uses qualitative methods is analyzed based on rules, testimony of experts and the protection of labour rights. This research analyzing case bankcrupt and response from curator and panel of judges based on Act No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower Indonesia and Act No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts with the Blessings of God Almighthy. The Purpose of this research is to give explanation about the termination of employment and labour rights in cases bankrupt No. 31/Pdt.Sus/Pailit/2014/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Labour right in article 95 paragraph 4 on Act No. 13 of 2003 is enaugh to protect. But, the protecting labour right in cases bankrupt No. 31/Pdt.Sus/Pailit/2014/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst is not fulfilled. "

"Laborers? rights issues and the rights to work for workers in Batam and Tangerang"

"Hak pekerja harian di Indonesia belum menerima perlindungan hukum secara maksimal dari pada pekerja harian di Singapura. Dalam memenuhi kebutuhan hidupnya, manusia perlu bekerja. Salah satu opsi dalam bekerja yang dapat dipilih adalah bekerja secara harian. Pekerja yang bekerja secara harian disebut pekerja harian. Pada praktiknya di Indonesia, pekerja harian masih sering tidak memperoleh haknya. Hal ini berbeda dengan pekerja harian di Singapura. Singapura yang merupakan salah satu negara terkemuka di Asia telah mengkategorikan pekerja yang memiliki karakteristik mirip dengan pekerja harian sebagai pekerja paruh waktu. Hak-hak pekerja harian di Singapura telah secara jelas diatur dalam undang-undang dan hampir memiliki hak yang sama seperti pekerja tetap. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini menjelaskan lebih dalam tentang perlindungan hukum hak pekerja harian di Indonesia dan di Singapura, serta menganalisis lebih dalam terkait persamaan dan perbedaan perlindungan hukum bagi hak pekerja harian di Indonesia dan Singapura, sehingga pembaca dapat menemukan keunggulan perlindungan hukum hak yang dimiliki oleh Singapura. Selain itu, tulisan ini juga membahas tentang kemungkinan penerapan perlindungan hukum hak pekerja harian di Indonesia berdasarkan unsur-unsur yang diatur di Singapura dan masalah yang akan timbul jika terjadi penerapan ini. Tulisan ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal dengan mengumpulkan dan mengkaji sumber kepustakaan atau data sekunder.  Setelah data terkumpul, data tersebut diolah dan dianalisis dengan metode deskriptif analitis, artinya data akan dikelompokkan sesuai dengan aspek yang diteliti, kemudian ditarik kesimpulan, dan diuraikan secara deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat dilihat bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi hak pekerja harian di Indonesia dan Singapura memiliki keunggulannya masing-masing. Jika ditunjau dengan teori perlindungan hukum, hukum ketenagakerjaan di Singapura lebih memberikan perhatian pada pekerja harian dibandingkan di Indonesia. Hal ini dibuktikan dari hak upah lembur, cuti, dan sistem jaminan sosial di Singapura yang lebih memberikan apresiasi terhadap kinerja pekerja.

---

The rights of daily workers in Indonesia have not received the maximum legal protection compared to daily workers in Singapore. To fulfill their daily needs, humans need to work. One of the work options that can be chosen is working daily. Workers who work daily are called casual workers. In practice in Indonesia, daily workers often do not receive their rights. This is different from daily workers in Singapore. Singapore, which is one of the leading countries in Asia, has categorized workers who have characteristics similar to daily workers as part-time workers. The rights of casual workers in Singapore are clearly regulated in law and have almost the same rights as permanent workers. Therefore, this article explains in more depth the legal protection of the rights of daily workers in Indonesia and Singapore, as well as analyzing further the similarities and differences in legal protection for the rights of daily workers in Indonesia and Singapore, so that readers can discover the advantages of legal protection of rights that owned by Singapore. Apart from that, this article also discusses the possibility of implementing the law to protect the rights of daily workers in Indonesia based on the elements regulated in Singapore and the problems that will arise if this implementation occurs. This article was prepared using doctrinal research methods by collecting and reviewing library sources or secondary data. After the data is collected, the data is processed and analyzed using the analytical descriptive method, meaning that the data will be collected according to the aspects studied, then conclusions will be drawn and described descriptively. Based on the research results, it can be seen that legal protection for the rights of daily workers in Indonesia and Singapore has its own advantages. If we look at the theory of legal protection, employment law in Singapore pays more attention to daily workers than in Indonesia. This is realized from the rights to overtime pay, leave, and the social security system in Singapore which provides greater appreciation for worker performance."

"Dalam pelaksanaan pembangunan nasional, tenaga kerja mempunyai peranan dan kedudukan yang sangat penting sebagai pelaku dan tujuan pembangunan itu sendiri. Dalam pembangunan sektor ekonomi, tenaga kerja menjadi salah satu komponen penting dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi disamping faktor-faktor pendukung lainnya. Pemberlakuan perjanjian kerja merupakan alternatif yang terbaik, sebab merupakan wahana bagi hubungan kemitraan yang memungkinkan masing–masing pihak saling memahami dan menghormati peranan serta hak dan kewajibannya. Perbedaan yang terjadi antara teori dan pelaksanaan sering menjadi permasalahan dalam penerapan hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia, khususnya dalam hal pembidangan jenis pekerjaan yang dilakukan oleh para pekerja/buruh. Perbedaan pembidangan ini tentunya juga akan menimbulkan perbedaan terhadap hak, kewajiban serta perlindungan hukum yang didapat bagi mereka yang melakukan perjanjian kerja tersebut. Salah satunya seperti yang terjadi pada pekerjaan satuan pengamanan pada PT.Gedung BankExim Jakarta. Pada perusahaan ini, mempekerjakan pekerja/buruh satuan pengamanan yang terdiri atas pekerja/buruh tetap dan pekerja/buruh kontrak outsourcing yang terikat pada bentuk perjanjian kerja yang berbeda dengan pengusaha pemberi kerja. Perbedaan bentuk perjanjian kerja yang dilakukan, tentunya akan mengakibatkan pula perbedaan dalam hal hak dan kewajiban dari masing-masing pihak yang terikat dalam perjanjian kerja tersebut. Perlindungan tentunya wajib diberikan terhadap pihak pekerja/buruh, khususnya pekerja/buruh outsource yang berada dipihak yang lemah dan sering dirugikan akibat sistem hukum perburuhan yang ada sekarang ini. Perlindungan terhadap pekerja/buruh diberikan oleh Undang-undang No. 13 tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan maupun perlindungan yang diberikan dalam perjanjian kerja tersebut. Metode penelitian yang akan digunakan penulis adalah metode kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif.

---

Within realization in national development, labor has important role and position as an actor and as an objective to the development it self. In economic development sector, labor was one of the important component to pushing economic progress beside any other support factor. Put the labor aggrement to be effective was the best alternatif, because it was a medium to have a friendship relation that make eachside understand and respect his role along with his rights and obligation. The different between the theory and the practical it has been a problem for the application of laboring law in Indonesia, specialy in sort of working chategory that the workers do. This different chategory also can cause a different chategory also can cause a different concerning in rights, obligation and also law protection for them who do this kind of labor aggrement. One of them it happens to security work at PT.Gedung BankExim Jakarta. This company, employ security workers consist of permanent workers and Outsourcing contract workers that being bound to a different kind of labor aggrement with the entrepreneur workgiver. The different kind of labor aggreement that they do, also can cause the different about rights and obligation from eachside that being bound in this labor aggrement. Protection must be given to workers, specialy outsource workers that in the weak side and ussually suffer the most because of the labor law system that prevails this day. Protection to worker given by act number 13 (theerteen) year 2003 about laboring and also protection given on the labor aggrement. Research method that would use by the writter is a literature method that have yuridis normatief characteristic."

"ABSTRAKIstilah pekerja/buruh migran sudah dikenal di dunia, namun di Republik Indonesia istilah pekerja/buruh migran disebut sebagai Tenaga Kerja Asing atau TKA. Dalam menggunakan TKA perlu diketahui bagaimana pengaturan mengenai tata cara, instansi yang berwenang, pengawasan, dan sanksi pelanggaran terhadap penggunaan TKA yang bekerja di wilayah Republik Indonesia berdasarkan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Di lain sisi perlu juga diketahui bagaimana pelaksanaan pengaturan tersebut di lapangan dikaitkan dengan masalah TKA Ilegal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis dan dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pengaturan mengenai penggunaan TKA yang meliputi aspek persyaratan administratif, tata cara, dan sanksi atas pelanggaran penggunaan TKA sudah memadai, namun diperlukan pengaturan TKA Ilegal terkait pengawasan TKA. Dalam pelaksanaan pengaturan mengenai penggunaan TKA di lapangan, terdapat permasalahan meliputi pengawasan secara administratif dan pengawasan di lapangan. Dalam praktiknya para pengawas masih menggunakan mekanisme surat-surat rekomendasi untuk melakukan pengawasan di lapangan karena pembentukan Tim Pora membutuhkan koordinasi antar-instansi, tidak hanya imigrasi tetapi juga instansi lainnya, yang pengawas anggap tahap administrasi koordinasi cukup menghabiskan waktu. Adapun terkait TKA Ilegal di lapangan, Pengawas Ketenagakerjaan memilih tidak menggunakan istilah TKA Ilegal dan menggunakan istilah TKA yang bermasalah.

---

ABSTRAKThe term migrant workers is well known in the world, but in the Republic of Indonesia the term migrant workers is referred to as Tenaga Kerja Asing or TKA. In the usage of foreign workers, it is necessary to know how the arrangement of procedures, authorized institutions, supervision and sanction of violations against the usage of foreign workers who working in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia based on applicable legislation in Indonesia. On the other hand, it is also necessary to know how the implementation in practice is associated with the problem of illegal foreign workers TKA Ilegal . This research uses Normative Juridical Research method which is conducted analytical descriptive with qualitative approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation on the usage of foreign workers covering administrative requirements, procedures and sanctions for violation of using foreign workers is sufficient, but it is necessary to regulate the illegal foreign workers regarding supervision of the foreign workers. In the practice, there are problems in administrative supervision and supervision in the field. In practice the supervisors still use the recommendation letters mechanism to carry out the investigation because Tim Pora requires inter institution coordination, not only immigration but also other institutions which the supervisor considers the phase of coordination administration to be time consuming. As for illegal foreign workers, the Employment Supervisor chose not to use the term ldquo TKA Ilegal rdquo and use problematic foreign workers instead."