Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Rumah Sakit Karya Bhakti Pratiwi telah menggunakan seftriakson baik generik maupun bermerek dagang sebagai lini pertama terapi demam tifoid sejak tahun 2012 berdasarkan pola kepekaan antibiotik RS tersebut. Perbedaan harga yang signifikan antara kedua jenis seftriakson mendorong berlangsungnya penelitian ini. Analisis efektivitas-biaya AEB dilakukan untuk mengukur dan membandingkan efektivitas serta biaya antara kedua jenis pengobatan sehingga dapat menentukan jenis pengobatan yang lebih cost-effective. Penelitian berupa penelitian analitik cross-sectional secara retrospektif yaitu data penggunaan seftriakson sebagai terapi untuk pasien anak demam tifoid pada tahun 2016 dengan metode total sampling. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, yaitu data peresepan dan data keuangan dari sistem informasi manajemen rumah sakit. Sampel yang dilibatkan dalam analisis adalah sebanyak 63 pasien, yaitu 43 pasien kelompok seftriakson generik dan 20 pasien kelompok seftriakson bermerek dagang. Efektivitas pengobatan diukur berdasarkan lama hari rawat. Biaya didapatkan dari median total biaya pengobatan, meliputi biaya obat, biaya laboratorium, biaya alat kesehatan, biaya pelayanan dan biaya rawat inap. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, efektivitas seftriakson generik setara dengan seftriakson bermerek dagang dengan median lama hari rawat sebesar 4 hari. Hasil penelitian yang dinyatakan dalam rasio efektifitas biaya REB menunjukkan bahwa seftriakson generik REB: Rp.575.937,25/hari lebih cost-effective dibandingkan seftriakson bermerek dagang REB: Rp.888.601,75/hari.

---

Karya Bhakti Pratiwi Hospital has been using generic ceftriaxone and branded ceftriaxone for typhoid fever first line therapy in pediatric patients since 2012. The significant difference in the cost of both ceftriaxone type encouraged researcher to perform Cost effectiveness analysis CEA . CEA was performed to measure and compare the effectivity and the cost of the two kinds of therapy so the more cost effective therapy can be determined. The study design was a cross sectional ndash analytical study. Data were collected retrospectively with total sampling method. The data consisted of prescribing data and administrative financial data. The number of samples were 63 patients, consisted of 43 patients with generics ceftriaxone and 20 patients with branded ceftriaxone. The effectiveness of the therapy were measured as length of stay of the patients. The total cost of therapy was the median of summed calculation of cost of drugs, cost of laborartory examination, cost of medical devices usage, cost of physician service, and cost of hospitalization. The results of this study shows that the effectiveness of both generics and branded ceftriaxone was 4 days of stay. The analysis result as cost effectiveness ratio showed that generics ceftriaxone CER Rp.575,937.25 day is more cost effective than branded ceftriaxone CER Rp.888,601.75 day.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Transfusi darah dibutuhkan dalam meningkatkan kualitas hidup pasien thalassemia mayor, namun dapat menyebabkan kelebihan zat besi, sehingga diperlukan terapi kelasi besi, seperti deferipron dan deferasirox. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis obat yang lebih cost-effective dengan metode Analisis Efektivitas-Biaya AEB karena masing-masing obat memiliki perbedaan efektivitas dan biaya obat yang signifikan. Data diambil secara retrospektif dan pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara total sampling berdasarkan catatan rekam medik dan sistem informasi rumah sakit. Pasien yang diikutsertakan merupakan pasien anak-anak pengguna deferipron n=33 dan deferasirox n=27 yang rutin melakukan transfusi darah pada tahun 2016. Efektivitas pengobatan diukur berdasarkan perubahan kadar serum ferritin. Biaya didapatkan dari median total biaya pengobatan, meliputi biaya obat, alat kesehatan, tindakan, administrasi dan jasa dokter, laboratorium serta kantong darah. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, deferasirox 1.164 ng/mL lebih efektif dari deferipron 692 ng/mL dan median total biaya pengobatan deferasirox lebih mahal. Hasil akhir menunjukkan bahwa rasio efektivitas-biaya deferasirox Rp 65.816,68 lebih rendah dari deferipron Rp 74.956,60 , namun keduanya tidak ada yang mendominasi sehingga tidak dapat ditentukan terapi yang lebih cost-effective. Bila pengobatan deferipron dipilih, perlu dikeluarkan biaya tambahan sebesar Rp 52.416,64 untuk peningkatan satu unit efektivitas dan pengambil kebijakan di pelayanan kesehatan harus mempertimbangkan apakah biaya lebih tersebut sebanding dengan peningkatan efektivitasnya.

---

ABSTRAK
Blood transfusions are needed in improving the quality of life of major thalassemia patients, but it can lead to excess iron, so it requires iron chelation therapy, such as deferiprone and deferasirox. This study is aimed to analyse whether deferipron or deferasirox is more cost effective with Cost Effectiveness Analysis CEA method because each drug has a significant difference in effectiveness and drug costs. Data were taken retrospectively and sampling was done using total sampling based on medical records and hospital information systems. Patients which included are pediatric patients with deferiprone n 33 and deferasirox n 27 who regulary perform blood transfusion in 2016. The effectiveness is measured by changes in serum ferritin levels and the cost is median of the total cost, summed from the cost of drugs, medical devices, hospitalization, administration, physician, laboratories and blood bags. Based on the results, the effectiveness of deferasirox 1,164 ng mL is greater than deferiprone 692 ng mL and median total cost of deferasirox is more expensive. The final result showed that cost effective ratio of deferasirox Rp 65.816,68 is lower than deferiprone Rp 74.956,60 , but none of both medications is dominant and therefore we could not determine which medication is more cost effective. If deferiprone is selected, it requires extra cost Rp 52.416,64 to increase the effectivity. Policy maker in healthcare facility need to consider if incremental cost of medication is equal to its increased effectiveness.

Abstrak :
This introductory text covers the basics of accounting and financial management and demonstrates the application of these principles to pharmacy practice

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penyakit pneumonia adalah salah satu penyebab utama kematian pada anak di dunia. Kasus kematian anak di Indonesia yang diakibat oleh pneumonia diperkirakan mencapai 23,6 . Antibiotik memiliki peran penting dalam terapi pengobatan pneumonia. Pemberian ampisilin dan seftriakson direkomendasikan untuk pasien pneumonia anak. Analisis Efektivitas Biaya AEB merupakan salah satu metode farmakoekonomi untuk mengetahui obat yang efektif dengan biaya terkecil. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk membandingkan total biaya medis langsung dan efektivitas yang ditinjau dari lama hari rawat pasien yang menggunakan ampisilin dan seftriakson. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah non eksperimental dengan studi penelitian cross sectional. Pengambilan data dilakukan secara retrospektif terhadap data sekunder pasien dan data keuangan pasien pneumonia anak di Rumah Sakit Anak dan Bunda Harapan Kita Jakarta Tahun 2016. Pengambilan sampel dilkakukan secara total sampling. Jumlah pasien dalam analisis sebanyak 21 pasien, yaitu 8 pasien menggunakan ampisilin dan 13 pasien menggunakan seftriakson. Median total biaya medis antara ampisilin dan seftriakson berturut-turut sebesar Rp 2.717.075,00 dan. Rp 3.333.750,00. Median lama hari rawat ampisilin dan seftriakson berturut-turut 5,5 hari dan 6 hari. Berdasarkan AEB menunjukkan bahwa ampisilin lebih cost-effective dibandingkan seftriakson.

---

ABSTRACT
Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in children in the world. The case of child mortality in Indonesia caused by pneumonia is estimated at 23.6 . Antibiotics have an important role in the treatment of pneumonia therapy. Provision of ampicillin and ceftriaxone is recommended for pediatric pneumonia patients. Cost Effectiveness Analysis AEB is one of the pharmacoeconomic methods to find out the effective drug with the smallest cost. This study was conducted to compare the total direct medical cost and effectiveness, which was measured from length of stay LOS , of ampicillin and ceftriaxone usage. The research design used was non experimental with cross sectional study. Retrospective data retrieval was performed on patient secondary data and financial data of child pneumonia patient at Rumah Sakit Anak dan Bunda Harapan Kita Jakarta in 2016. Samples were taken by using total sampling method. The number of patients in the analysis were 21 patients, which included 8 patients with ampicillin and 13 patients with ceftriaxone. Median total medical costs between ampicillin and ceftriaxone were respectively Rp 2,717,075.00 and. Rp 3,333,750.00. Median duration of day of ampicillin and ceftriaxone consecutive 5.5 days and 6 days. An AEB shows that ampicillin is more cost effective than ceftriaxone.

Abstrak :
Contents : The role of technology in the supply chain Managing supply chain technology The economic significance of healthcare investment The importance of intellectual property : its development and protection The operational provision of healthcare Conflicting goals within the supply chain Diversion and parallel trade Tactical responses to diversion Managing compliance The case for enhanced patient protection Applying technology to secure the supply chain to patients The importance of information The future of healthcare. Notes