Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini membahas struktur wacana naratif dan unsur penghubung yang menjadi faktor keutuhan wacana bahasa Isyarat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan menganalisis video bahasa Isyarat tentang tuturan dongeng Kelinci dan Kura-kura yang disampaikan oleh dua informan Tuli penutur jati bahasa Isyarat Jakarta. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguraikan struktur wacana naratif dan unsur penghubung wacana dari unsur kohesif dan unsur topik komen atas data yang sudah diambil dan ditranskripsikan. Berdasarkan variabel struktur yang diberikan oleh Labov dan Waletzky 1967 , wacana naratif bahasa Isyarat memiliki kesesuaian dari segi strukturnya. Dalam hal keutuhan wacana, terdapat kesesuaian dengan aspek-aspek yang diajukan oleh Schembri dan Johnston 2007 dalam menganalisis unsur kohesif dan topik komen. Unsur topik komen sebagai keutuhan wacana naratif terlihat dalam kesinambungan topik. Unsur kohesif dan topik komen dalam wacana naratif oleh penutur Isyarat ditandai dengan gerakan manual dan gerakan nomanual. ...... This study deals with the narrative structure and connecting elements of narrative discourse in Jakarta Sign Language JakSL . There are two methods used in this study, descriptive and qualitative. This study aims to describe the narrative superstructure and connecting elements of narrative discourse mdash focusing on cohesive and topic comment mdash from the data. The data are taken from transcription of two narrative signing videos about fable mdash The Hare and The Tortoise mdash narrated by JakSL signers. Between the theories about narrative structure by Labov dan Waletzky 1967 , research by Schembri dan Johnston 2007 and analysis of the data, there are compatibility of aspects in narrative superstructure. Moreover, it appears that manual and non manual sign are used to mark the connecting elements of narrative discourse in cohesive aspects and topic comment. Topic comment aspect is constantly delivered in topic continuity to demonstrate the unity of narrative discourse.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas penggunaan alat kohesi gramatikal pada wacana naratif lisan yang dituturkan anak usia prasekolah 4 mdash;6 tahun . Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat pengaruh gender pada penggunaan alat kohesi gramatikal anak usia prasekolah. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 28 anak perempuan dan laki-laki yang bersekolah di Taman Kanak-kanak Bogor. Data penelitian ini adalah tuturan narasi oleh subjek penelitian berdasarkan buku cerita bergambar tanpa tulisan. Data tersebut diperoleh melalui Teknik elisitasi produksi. Selain itu, terdapat pula data berupa gambaran demografis subjek dan orang tua subjek yang didapatkan dari kuesioner. Perbandingan penggunaan alat kohesi gramatikal dianalisis secara statistik dan dikaitkan dengan sejumlah teori mengenai pemerolehan bahasa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kecenderungan berbeda pada anak perempuan dan laki-laki dalam memproduksi alat kohesi gramatikal. Akan tetapi, perbedaan kecenderungan tersebut tidak signifikan. ......This research analyzed the use of grammatical cohesion devices in narrative discourse between Girls and Boys in preschool age. This research is done to see how gender could affect preschool kids in using grammatical cohesion device. The subjects of this research are 28 girls and boys who attended Bogor Kindergarten. The data used in this research is narratives speech that were told by the kids based on wordless picture story book which obtained by using elicited production task technique. Other than that, there were also demographic visual of the subject and their parents based on the questionnaire that given before. The comparison between subject rsquo s use of grammatical cohesion device were analyzed statistically and linked to several theories about language acquisition and gender studies. The result shows that there are several trends in the use of grammatical cohesion device between girls and boys. However, the statistical analysis indicates that the difference is not significant.

Abstrak :
[Narratives enable readers to vividly experience fictional and non-fictional contexts. Writers use a variety of language features to control these experiences: they direct readers in how to construct contexts, how to draw inferences and how to identify the key parts of a story. Writers can skilfully convey physical sensations, prompt emotional states, effect moral responses and even alter the readers' attitudes. Mind, Brain and Narrative examines the psychological and neuroscientific evidence for the mechanisms which underlie narrative comprehension. The authors explore the scientific developments which demonstrate the importance of attention, counterfactuals, depth of processing, perspective and embodiment in these processes. In so doing, this timely, interdisciplinary work provides an integrated account of the research which links psychological mechanisms of language comprehension to humanities work on narrative and style., Narratives enable readers to vividly experience fictional and non-fictional contexts. Writers use a variety of language features to control these experiences: they direct readers in how to construct contexts, how to draw inferences and how to identify the key parts of a story. Writers can skilfully convey physical sensations, prompt emotional states, effect moral responses and even alter the readers' attitudes. Mind, Brain and Narrative examines the psychological and neuroscientific evidence for the mechanisms which underlie narrative comprehension. The authors explore the scientific developments which demonstrate the importance of attention, counterfactuals, depth of processing, perspective and embodiment in these processes. In so doing, this timely, interdisciplinary work provides an integrated account of the research which links psychological mechanisms of language comprehension to humanities work on narrative and style.]

Abstrak :
Drawing upon innovative theoretical and empirical scholarship presented at Narrative Matters 2012: Life and Narrative (The American University of Paris, May 29-June 1, 2012), this volume seeks to make a significant contribution to our understanding of the dynamic interplay of life and narrative by creatively addressing it from multiple angles. It features cross-disciplinary work by cutting-edge scholars in the social sciences and the humanities, including Jens Brockmeier, Jerome Bruner, Mark Freeman, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, James Phelan, and Brian Richardson. Four main intellectual contributions distinguish this volume. First, the contributors clearly detail the conceptual and empirical frameworks for describing the mutual construction of narrative and life. Second, the volume illustrates the tension between the need for narratives to hold and represent factual experiences and the power of narrative to conjure coherent worlds of imagination. Third, the volume explores the tension between the power of social and cultural forces to influence, or even impose, pre-configured interpretations on experience and the ingenuity of persons to create their own interpretations of experience. Finally, the problem of life and narrative is conceived as a cross-disciplinary problem.Cross-disciplinary study is crucial for thinking through basic problems in the social sciences and the humanities. There is still little dialogue among the disciplinary groups studying narrative, but these are conversations without boundaries, and limiting the scope leaves out critical perspectives that can advance knowledge of narrative, literature, and human beings. This volume aims to introduce a wide range of narrative scholars to the broader questions that narrative studies entails.