Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Cratylus adalah salah satu karya Plato yang kerap dianggap sebagai benih filsafat bahasa. Selama ini, Cratylus cenderung dibaca berdasarkan horizon logika Aristotelian. Hal ini mengakibatkan terpolarisasinya pandangan mengenai kebenaran tentang nama, yang berujung pada oposisi antara naturalisme dan konvensionalisme dalam filsafat bahasa. Tesis ini berusaha memberikan pembacaan baru terhadap Cratylus menggunakan horizon logika Hegelian. Tujuannya, untuk mencapai sintesis yang dapat menjembatani perbedaan antara naturalisme dan konvensionalisme, yakni dengan menempatkan keduanya bukan dalam relasi opositif, melainkan relasi paradoksal. Perbedaan horizon logika yang digunakan ternyata melahirkan pandangan yang berbeda mengenai kebenaran. Pembacaan menggunakan horizon logika Hegelian menghasilkan sintesis berupa konsep baru mengenai referensi.

---

Cratylus is one of Plato's work which considered as philosophy of language's seed. All these time, Cratylus tends to read based on Aristotelian logic's horizon. This caused polarization on views about the truth about name, which ends on opposition between naturalism and conventionalism in philosophy of language. This thesis is trying to provide novel reading on Cratylus by using Hegelian logic's horizon. The purpose is to accomplish synthesis that can connect the difference between naturalism and conventionalism, by putting both parties, not in opposition relation but rather in paradox relation. The difference on logical horizon that is used apparently bear different views about the truth. The readings using Hegelian logic's horizon generating synthesis of new concept about reference."

"Skripsi ini mengkaji dialektika masyarakat tentang bagaimana pandangan yang dibentuk oleh mereka terhadap situasi pandemi Covid-19. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui partisipan observasi dalam menelusuri pandangan masyarakat, tulisan ini mengkaji dialog yang terjadi antara masyarakat yang percaya dan tidak percaya dengan virus Covid-19. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dialektika yang terjadi pada masyarakat dalam menghadapi Covid-19 menghasilkan metafor-metafor sebagai ideologi bagi mereka dan menghadirkan stimulus atas tindakan-tindakan yang mereka lakukan.

---

This thesis examines the dialectic of society regarding the views formed by them towards the Covid-19 pandemic situation. By using qualitative methods through participatory observation in exploring people's views, this paper examines the dialogue that occurs between people who believe and do not believe in the Covid-19 virus. The results of this study indicate that the dialectic that occurs in society in dealing with Covid-19 produces metaphors as an ideology for them and presents a stimulus for the actions they take."

"Diskursus lingkungan tidak terlepas dari persoalan mengenai bagaimana relasi yang terbentuk antara manusia dan alam. Sebagai salah satu pemikiran lingkungan, Sosial Ekologi yang digagas Murray Bookchin, menyoroti problem hierarki-dominasi sosial sebagai titik permasalahan ekologi. Sosial Ekologi memandang bahwa problem hierarki-dominasi sosial ini mempengaruhi persepsi dan relasi manusia dengan alam. Sosial Ekologi mengajukan perubahan sistem relasional lingkup sosial, dan menawarkan visi alternatif dari alam sebagai cerminan keberagaman dalam kesatuan dinamis dan relasi komplementer yang bebas dari unsur hierarki dan dominasi. Dalam pandangan seperti ini, baik relasi antar manusia sosial-masyarakat manusia , dan seluruh entitas alam digambarkan sebagai sesuatu yang tumbuh berdampingan dalam keberagama, serta bebas dari relasi superior dan inferior, yang ia sebut sebagai masyarakat ekologis.

---

An environmental discourse cannot be separated with the relation between human and its nature. As a part of environmental philosophy, Social Ecology presented by Murray Bookchin focuses on the hierarchical social domination as an ecological problem. Social Ecology argues that this problem influences the perspective and relation between human and nature. It also proposes a relational system change in the social circle and offers an alternative vision from the nature as a reflection of unity, diversity, and complementary relation which is free from any hierarchy and domination. In this point of view, both societal relationship and every entities belong to the nature shall be described as a harmonious diversity, and also free from superior inferior relationship, which Bookchin refers to as an ecological society."

"The ancient Chinese scholars are fond of applying the Yin and Yang diagram to correlate almost everything. This book continues that tradition and uses the model to study other non-?dialectical? theories and models. The major finding qua contribution in this publication is to point out that the four diagrams are equivalent to the BaGua or BaGuaTu (BG), a set of eight ancient China symbolic notations/gossip. Another finding is that dialectical/crab and frog motion remark is just the opposite of a non-dialectical/crab and frog motion (usually deductive, linear, or cause and effect) remark, or, at best, they must meet half-way.The two major tasks of this book are to, first, apply the author's one-dot theory, which is shored up by the crab and frog motion model, to convert other theories and models as well as studies and, second, apply his theory and model to reinvent some well-known western-derived theories and models and studies, such as game theory. "