Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Mendisiplinkan anak merupakan salah satu tugas yang penting bagi orang tua. Namun sayangnya, banyak orang tua yang masih menggunakan disiplin yang tidak efektif, seperti corporal punishment. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran corporal punishment myth dan regulasi emosi (suppression, capitulation, escape) terhadap penggunaan corporal punishment pada orang tua yang mengasuh anak berusia 2-6 tahun. Penelitian dilakukan pada 125 orang tua yang berasal dari seluruh Indonesia dengan menggunakan alat ukur Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory, Vignettes Corporal Punishment Intention, dan dimensi corporal punishment dari alat ukur Conflict Tactic Scale-Parent Child Version. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik zero-inflated count regression. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa corporal punishment myth, suppression, escape, dan capitulation tidak dapat memprediksi perilaku corporal punishment. Selain itu, corporal punishment myth dan suppression tidak dapat memprediksi intensi corporal punishment. Sedangkan, capitulation dan escape mampu memprediksi intensi corporal punishment pada count model, (IRR = 4.19, p < .05; IRR = 1.14, p < .05), tetapi tidak pada zero model, (OR = 1.26, p > .05 OR = 1.12, p > .05). Hasil penelitian mengimplikasikan bahwa masing-masing jenis regulasi emosi memiliki peranan yang berbeda dalam mempengaruhi frekuensi munculnya intensi corporal punishment.

---

Discipline is one of the most important tasks in parents’ life. Unfortunately, many parents still use ineffective discipline, such as corporal punishment. This study aimed to determine the role of corporal punishment myth and emotion regulation (suppression, capitulation, escape) on corporal punishment use in parents who had children aged 2-6 years. The study was conducted on 125 parents from all over Indonesia using Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory, Corporal Punishment Intention Vignettes, and corporal punishment dimension of Conflict Tactic Scale-Parent Child Version. The data were analyzed using zero-inflated count regression. The results showed that corporal punishment myth, suppression, escape, and capitulation could not predict corporal punishment behavior. Moreover, corporal punishment myth and suppression could not predict the intention of corporal punishment. Meanwhile, capitulation and escape were able to predict the intention of corporal punishment in the count model (IRR = 4.19, p < .05; IRR = 1.14, p < .05), but not in the zero model (OR = 1.26, p>.05; OR = 1.12, p > .05). The results implied that each type of emotion regulation has different role in influencing the use of corporal punishment."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara gaya pengasuhan dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik dan kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik pada orang tua dengan anak usia early childhood. Gaya pengasuhan diukur menggunakan Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire milik Robinson dkk., 1995, kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik diukur menggunakan Corporal Punishment Myth Scale (Kish & Newcombe, 2015), dan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik diukur menggunakan vignettes dalam Corporal Punishment Myth Scale. Analisis statistika menggunakan Spearman correlation dengan arah pengujian 1-tailed. Terdapat 122 ayah dan ibu (M = 32.34, SD = 6.12) dengan anak usia 2-6 tahun (M = 3.66, SD = 1.33) yang berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara gaya pengasuhan authoritarian dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Hasil yang sama juga ditemukan antara kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Gaya pengasuhan permissive menunjukkan hubungan yang positif dan signifikan dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik, tetapi dengan arah korelasi yang berkebalikan dengan hipotesis. Tidak ditemukan hubungan yang negatif dan signifikan antara gaya pengasuhan authoritative dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Hasil penelitian dapat menjadi acuan bagi konselor untuk melaksanakan intervensi bagi orang tua dengan anak usia early childhood.

---

The present study aims to search whether there is a relationship between parenting styles, belief in corporal punishment myth, and corporal punishment use intention. Parenting styles were measured with Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire, constructed by Robinson et al., 1995; belief in corporal punishment myth was measured with Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, constructed by Kish and Newcombe (2015); and corporal punishment use intentions was measured with vignettes inside the Corporal Punishment Myth Scale. Spearman correlation with 1-tailed tests was used for hypothesis testing. There are 122 parents consist of mother and father (M = 32.34, SD = 6.12) with their 2-6 years old children (M = 3.66, SD = 1.33) participating in this study. The results showed that there is a positive and significant correlation between authoritarian parenting style with corporal punishment use intention. A positive and significant correlation between belief in corporal punishment myth with corporal punishment use intention is also found. While in permissive parenting style, there is a positive and significant correlation with corporal punishment use intention, but the direction is contradictive with the hypothesis. Lastly, there is no negative and significant correlation between authoritative parenting style and corporal punishment use intention. Research implications are discussed."