Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang nomor 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya Notaris mendapatkan penghasilan berupa honorarium, sehingga timbul suatu kewajiban lain bagi notaris yaitu membayar pajak atas penghasilan yang diperolehnya sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Penghasilan. Dalam menghitung besamya Pajak Terutang Notaris sebagai Wajib Pajak dapat memilih untuk menggunakan metode Pembukuan atau menggunakan metode Norma Penghitungan Penghasilan Neto. Bagaimana mekanisme penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan menurut keteniuan Undang-Undang Pajak Penghasilan Nomor 36 tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Penghasilan guna menentukan besamya Penghasilan Kena Pajak bagi Notaris. Dan apa saja permasalahan yang timbul di dalam praktek bagi Notaris tentang penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan, serta bagaimana penyelesaiannya. Untuk menjawab permasalahan ini maka penulis menggunakan penelitian yang bersifat yuridis empiris dimana lebih menekankan kepada apa yang terjadi di lapang. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dan analisis yang dilakukan secara kualitatif. Data yang dianalisa adalah Peraturan perundang-undangan dan data-data yang didapat dari para narasumber. Diperoleh gambaran bahwa penghasilan Notaris yang termasuk Objek Pajak adalah jasa yang dilakukan berkaitan dengan tugas dan wewenangnya. Notaris dalam menghitung pajak terutangnya lebih memilih untuk menggunakan metode Norma Penghitungan Penghasilan Neto karena dirasakan lebih mudah dan sederhana daripada metode Pembukuan yang dianggap lebih memberatkan karena biaya pengeluaran yang cukup tinggi tidak dapat dimasukkan dalam item (Biaya) pengurangan karena tidak memiliki bukti pengeluaran yang resmi

---

Notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and other authorities as referred to in Law number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. In carrying out their duties, the Notary receives income in the form of an honorarium, so that another obligation arises for the Notary, namely paying taxes on the income he earns in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 36 of 2008 concerning Income Tax. In calculating the amount of Tax Payable, a Notary as a Taxpayer can choose to use the Bookkeeping method or use the Net Income Calculation Norm method. What is the mechanism for calculating Income Tax according to the provisions of the Income Tax Law Number 36 of 2008 concerning Income Tax in order to determine the amount of Taxable Income for Notaries. And what are the problems that arise in practice for Notaries regarding the calculation of Income Tax, and how to solve them.

To answer this problem, the author uses empirical juridical research which emphasizes what is happening in the field. The data used is secondary data and the analysis is done qualitatively. The data analyzed are statutory regulations and data obtained from sources. An illustration is obtained that the income of a Notary which is included in the Tax Object is a service performed in relation to his duties and authorities. Notaries in calculating their tax payable prefer to use the Norms for Calculation of Net Income because it is felt to be easier and simpler than the Bookkeeping method which is considered more burdensome because high expenditure costs cannot be included in the item (Cost) reduction because they do not have official proof of expenditure."

"Normatively the amandement of Indonesian Constitution 1945 implemented pure presidential system. However, the system is not compatible with the multy parties system which is viasible based on the amandement. Thus, to maintain the presidential system, it needs further regulations in the form of Act concerns to more simple party system to support presidential system."

"All legal norms that govern society must be born from a higher legal norm. This legal norm for Indonesia is embodied in the Pancasila which prescribes the basic principles underlying the 1945 Constitution. The unifying function of the Pancasila is operationalized in the agreement to form a Unitary Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) whose motto "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika" expressly recognizes unity in diversity. The Pancasila has four pillars which in the constitutional history of Indonesia have become the subject of varying political interpretations to justify policies of incumbents. This paper will explore the normative concept of the four pillars and their influence on indonesia as a nation."

"Postmodern criminology promotes successful crime control through fulfillment of basic human rights of citizens. For Indonesia, the legal framework to realize and fulfill civil rights are already guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and supported by the state philosophy of Pancasila. However, despite such framework, structural adjustments are still necessary to ensure Indonesian society achieves full protection of these constitutionally recognized civil and political rights. This paper analyzes the constitutive criminology tradition which discourse attempts to ensure social structures are developed and institutionalized to create conditions to deter illegal acts and breach of laws. It posits that in this respect, crime should be seen as a result of the workings of Indonesian society which must be enabled to ensure equal opportunities for all Indonesians to freely and socially interact without harming others. "