Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Indonesia merupakan negara penghasil minyak nabati terbesar di dunia, lewat produksi minyak kelapa sawit. Meskipun sudah berkontribusi secara positif dalam menghasilkan devisa bagi Indonesia, komoditas kelapa sawit kerap kali terindikasi menerima diskriminasi dari negara konsumen yakni Uni Eropa, Inggris dan Swiss, yang menetapkam peraturan untuk memenuhi komitmen perubahan iklim di bawah peraturan UNFCCC. Di sisi lain, kegiatan produksi minyak kelapa sawit Indonesia, walau sudah diatur dalam rangkaian peraturan dan kebijakan, masih memerlukan perbaikan terutama dalam penegakkan hukum dan tata kelola hutan dan lahan. Perjanjian WTO sebagai peraturan internasional memperbolehkan adanya proteksi lingkungan yang tidak boleh dilakukan secara sewenang-wenang dan diskriminatif atau melalui pembatasan yang terselubung. Untuk itu, perlu dibuat sebuah kesepakatan yang dapat menyeimbangkan komitmen perubahan iklim dan perdagangan internasional untuk kelapa sawit berkelanjutan melalui beberapa forum baik bilateral maupun regional. ......Indonesia is the largest vegetable oil producer in the world, through the production of palm oil. Although it has contributed positively in generating foreign exchange for Indonesia, palm oil is often indicated to be discriminated against from consumer countries, namely the European Union, the United Kingdom and Switzerland, which set regulations to fulfill climate change commitments under the UNFCCC law. On the other hand, Indonesia's palm oil production activities, although already regulated in a series of regulations and policies, still need improvement, especially in law enforcement and forest and land governance. The WTO agreement as an international regulation allows for environmental protection that should not be carried out arbitrarily, discriminatory or through a disguise restriction. For this reason, it is necessary to make an agreement that can balance climate change commitments and international trade for sustainable palm oil through several bilateral and regional forums.

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Climate change has become an issue that is increasingly raising concerns. Scientific studies have portrayed the possible detrimental effects it could have towards human life. Consequentially, governments have started to regulate and implement measures in response. States have also convened together and negotiated international legal instruments in order to collectively address climate change. Nevertheless, an issue that remains of concern is compliance. The most recent international legal instrument, which is the Paris Agreement on Climate Change addresses compliance through a Compliance Committee, but limits possible responses in case of non compliance to not include adversarial and punitive responses. This brings the question on how can a State rsquo s citizens ensure that their government indeed complies with obligations and commitments under the climate change regime. In finding the answer to such question, this undergraduate thesis uses the normative juridical method in order to research, then analyse and evaluate a possible solution to the issue of compliance. After using such method, this thesis concludes that a possible solution is to use climate change litigation as a venue to hold governments accountable to their international, as well as national obligations. This is possible in Indonesia through Citizen Lawsuits. Nevertheless, there are external factors that may affect the success of cases, including the time needed for the central or regional government to adhere to court decisions, and how the resulting measure will be implemented and supervised. Therefore, it is suggested for further research to be conducted in order to understand the possibilities of climate change litigation.

---

ABSTRAK
Perubahan iklim telah menjadi isu yang semakin meningkatkan kekhawatiran. Studi ilmiah telah menggambarkan dampak merugikan yang mungkin terjadi terhadap kehidupan manusia, jika persoalan perubahan iklim tidak ditangani dengan benar. Akibtanya, pemerintahan berbagai negara telah mulai mengatur dan menerapkan langkah-langkah mitigasi dan adaptasi. Negara-negara juga telah menegosiasikan instrumen hukum internasional untuk bersama-sama menangani persoalan perubahan iklim. Namun demikian, masalah yang masih menjadi perhatian adalah kepatuhan. Instrumen hukum internasional terbaru, yaitu Paris Agreement on Climate Change telah membahas persoalan kepatuhan melalui diaturnya sebuah Komite Kepatuhan. Tetapi terdapat pembatasan terhadap tanggapan yang mungkin diberi oleh Komite Kepatuhan jika terdapat ketidakpatuhan terhadap Paris Agreement, yakni, tidak boleh bersifat adversarial dan punitif. Hal tersebut menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang bagaimana warga negara dapat memastikan bahwa pemerintahannya mematuhi kewajiban dan komitmen di bawah rezim perubahan iklim. Dalam menemukan jawaban untuk pertanyaan tersebut, riset skripsi ini menggunakan metode normatf yuridis untuk meriset, lalu menganalisis dan mengevaluasi solusi yang mungkin diterapkan terhadap masalah kepatuhan Negara. Dengan menggunakan metode tersebut, tesis ini menyimpulkan bahwa solusi yang mungkin adalah menggunakan litigasi perubahan iklim sebagai tempat untuk meminta pertanggungjawaban pemerintah terhadap kewajiban internasional, serta kewajiban nasional mereka. Hal ini dimungkinkan di Indonesia melalui Tuntutan Warga. Namun demikian, ada faktor eksternal yang dapat mempengaruhi keberhasilan kasus, termasuk waktu yang diperlukan bagi pemerintah pusat atau daerah untuk mematuhi keputusan pengadilan, dan bagaimana ukuran yang dihasilkan akan dilaksanakan dan diawasi. Oleh karena itu, disarankan supaya riset lebih lanjut mengenai kemungkinan-kemungkinan dan akibat terkait litigasi perubahan iklim untuk dilaksanakan oleh pihak berkepentingan.

Abstrak :
Legal aspects of mitigation and prevention of climate change in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
As frustration mounts in some quarters at the perceived inadequacy or speed of international action on climate change, and as the likelihood of significant impacts grows, the focus is increasingly turning to liability for climate change damage. Actual or potential climate change liability implicates a growing range of actors, including governments, industry, businesses, non-governmental organisations, individuals and legal practitioners. Climate Change Liability provides an objective, rigorous and accessible overview of the existing law and the direction it might take in seventeen developed and developing countries and the European Union. In some jurisdictions, the applicable law is less developed and less the subject of current debate. In others, actions for various kinds of climate change liability have already been brought, including high profile cases such as Massachusetts v. EPA in the United States. Each chapter explores the potential for and barriers to climate change liability in private and public law"-- Provided by publisher. Contents Machine generated contents note: Part I. Legal, Scientific and Policy Aspects: 1. Introduction Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; 2. The scientific basis for climate change liability Myles Allen; 3. Overview of legal issues relevant to climate change Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; 4. Policy considerations Jutta Brunne;e, Silke Goldberg, Richard Lord and Lavanya Rajamani; Part II. National Laws: Asia and Pacific: 5. Australia Ross Abbs, Peter Cashman and Tim Stephens; 6. China Deng Haifeng; 7. India Lavanya Rajamani and Shibani Ghosh; 8. Indonesia Mas Achmad Santosa, Rifqi Assegaf and Josi Khatarina; 9. Japan Yukari Takamura; Africa/Middle East: 10. Egypt Dalia Farouk and Lamiaa Youssef; 11. Israel Issachar Rosen-Zvi; 12. Kenya Patricia Kameri-Mbote and Collins Odote; 13. South Africa Debbie Collier and Jan Glazewski; Europe and Eurasia: 14. European Union Ludwig Kra;mer; 15. Germany Hans-Joachim Koch, Michael Lührs and Roda Verheyen; 16. Poland Bartosz Kuras, Maciej Szewczyk, Dominik Walkowski, Tomasz Wardynski and Izabella Zielinska-Barlozek; 17. English law Silke Goldberg and Richard Lord; 18. Russia Fiona Mucklow Cheremeteff, Max Gutbrod, Daria Ratsiborinskaya and Sergei Sitnikov; North America: 19. Canada Meinhard Doelle, Dennis Mahony and Alex Smith; 20. United States of America Michael B. Gerrard and Gregory E. Wannier; Central and South America: 21. Brazil Yanko Marcius de Alencar Xavier and Pedro Lucas de Moura Soares; 22. Mexico Jose; Juan Gonzalez Marquez.

Abstrak :
"This examination of the role of litigation in addressing the problem of climate change focuses not only on how the massive and growing number of lawsuits influences regulation directly but also on how the lawsuits shape corporate behavior and public opinion. It provides readers with an understanding of how these lawsuits have shaped approaches to mitigation and adaptation and have been used to try to force and to block regulation. There is a particular emphasis on lawsuits in the United States and Australia, the two jurisdictions that have had the most climate change litigation in the world, and the lessons supply broader insights into the role of courts in addressing climate change"--

Abstrak :
In Climate change from a criminological perspective, a panel of pioneering green criminologists investigates an increasingly complex chain of ecological causes and effects. Illegal acts are analyzed as they contribute to environmental decline (e.g., wildlife poaching) or result from ecological distress (e.g., survival-related theft). Regulatory and other interventions are critiqued, concepts of environmental harm refined, and new research methodologies called for. And while individual events described are mainly local, the contributors keep the global picture, and substantial questions about human rights and social relationships, firmly in mind. Topics featured include : global warming as corporate crime. Climate change and the courts : U.S. and global views. Climate change, natural disasters, and gender inequality. The roles and responsibilities of environmental enforcement networks. A sociocultural perspective on climate change denial. PLUS: instructive in-depth chapters on criminological aspects of Hurricane Katrina and the Japanese nuclear disaster.

Abstrak :
The book contains a comprehensive and interdisciplinary analysis of the current problems around marine scientific research in the Arctic region. It combines scientific, legal and policy aspects. The main questions addressed are, ongoing and future Arctic marine research, marine research in the Arctic Ocean in practice, the legal framework, enlarged continental shelves and the freedom of marine science and particularities and challenges of the Arctic region.