Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Perlakuan etis terhadap hewan sudah menjadi salah satu pertimbangan di dalam penerapan etika lingkungan. Kemunculan Animal Rights sebagai advokasi yang berangkat dari perlakuan etis bersifat serius, manambahkan perlindungan hukum sebagai jalan keluar. Skripsi ini bertujuan memaparkan penerapan yang dilakukan Animal Rights, serta konsekuensinya melalui analisis konsep tentang perlakuan etis yang telah mengalami pergeseran makna. Pengembalian kemanusiaan dan peran manusia sebagai moral agent menjadi titik tolak dari penentangan perlakuan etis yang berlebihan melalui Animal Rights. ......Ethical treatment of animals has become one of the considerations in the application of environmental ethics. Emerging of Animal Rights as advocating that departs from the ethical treatment of a serious nature, adding legal protection as a way out. This thesis aims to describe the implementation carried Animal Rights, and its consequences through the analysis of the concept of ethical treatment that has undergone a shift in meaning. Returns humanity and the role of humans as moral agents became the starting point of opposition to the ethical treatment of excessive through Animal Rights.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Video sebagai suatu bagian dari media massa, memiliki berbagai fungsi dalam masyarakat. Dengan adanya video yang ditampilkan oleh berbagai media massa, dapat mengubah perspektif masyarakat akan berbagai hal juga dapat menjadi sebuah agen kontrol sosial masyarakat, salah satunya perspektif dan kontrol sosial terhadap perlindungan satwa. Video dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori Agenda Setting, Kontrol Sosial dan Kriminologi Hijau, penulisan ini berusaha untuk membuktikan bahwa video dapat digunakan sebagai agen kontrol sosial terhadap perlindungan satwa.

---

ABSTRACT
Video as a part of the mass media, has a variety of functions in society. With the video shown by various media, they can change people 39 s perspectives and also can be as an agent of social control, either perspectives and social control over wildlife protection. The video analyzed by using the theory of Agenda Setting, Social Control and Green Criminology, this paper seeks to prove that the video could be used as an agent of social control over wildlife protection.

Abstrak :
Keberadaan Kebun Binatang Surabaya sebagai tempat untuk menjaga keberlangsungan spesies yang terancam punah menuai kritik karena terdapat indikasi adanya kekejaman terhadap satwa di dalamnya. Melalui sudut pandang species justice, manusia seharusnya bertanggung jawab terhadap spesies lain, namun berdasarkan kasus yang terjadi di Kebun Binatang Surabaya manusia merupakan subjek utama yang melakukan kekejaman terhadap satwa. Berbagai kasus yang menjadi temuan data dalam tulisan ini menunjukkan adanya bentuk kekejaman terhadap satwa yang berupa kematian satwa, kehilangan, dan kelalaian yang menyalahi kondisi positif dari animal welfare. Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa pihak pengelola Kebun Binatang Surabaya telah melakukan pelanggaran hak-hak satwa karena lalai menyediakan perlindungan terhadap satwa di dalamnya sehingga perlu dilakukan penindakan dengan tegas. Meskipun uraian data mengenai kondisi satwa Kebun Binatang Surabaya tergolong kekejaman terhadap satwa, namun belum ada payung hukum yang kuat. Penggolongan kekejaman terhadap satwa sebagai tindak pelanggaran pidana dapat menjadi solusi untuk mencegah terjadinya kekejaman terhadap satwa lainnya.

---

The existence and role of Surabaya National Zoo as a safe haven for endangered species intice many critics due to indications of acts of cruelty against animals practiced inside the zoo by the its staff and management. Based on the perspective of species justice, humans are responsible for the well-being of other species. However, based on the case that took place at Surabaya National Zoo, humans were the main perpetrators of acts of cruelty against animals. Many cases included in this paper indicates acts of cruelty that inflicts harm to the extent of causing death, the loss of animals from captivity, and the unprofessionalism in the zoo keeping practices which violates the possitve conditions of animal wellfare. The author of this paper concluded that the zoo's management have committed violations against animal rights due to their failure in providing safe haven for the animals under their captivity and must be severely punished. Even though the data in this paper are categorized as acts of cruelty against animals, there has yet to be any law that protects animals from said cruelty. The construction of animal cruelty as a violation against the law may be the solution in preventing other and/or possible cases of acts of cruelty against animals.

Abstrak :
"Since its original publication in 1975, this groundbreaking work has awakened millions of people to the existence of "speciesism," our systematic disregard of nonhuman animals, inspiring a worldwide movement to transform our attitudes to animals and eliminate the cruelty we inflict on them. In 'Animal Liberation', author Peter Singer exposes the chilling realities of today's "factory farms" and product-testing procedures, destroying the spurious justifications behind them, and offering alternatives to what has become a profound environmental and social as well as moral issue. An important and persuasive appeal to conscience, fairness, decency, and justice, it is essential reading for the supporter and the skeptic alike." -- Back cover.

Abstrak :
This book investigates the historical significance of the American animal welfare movement at home and overseas from the second great awakening to the second world war, a time span encompassing the nations shift from muscle power to motorization. Dedicated primarily to laboring animals at its inception, the humane movement grew to include virtually all areas of human/animal interaction. Embracing animals as brethren through biblical concepts of stewardship, humane activists worked with temperance groups, educators, missionaries, religious leaders, civil rights activists, policy makers, and anti-imperialists to create an expansive transnational gospel of kindness in hopes of building a more merciful nation and world. Ultimately, animal protectionists defined kindness to animals as an American humanitarian ideal. Their interpretation of this gospel extended beyond the New Testament to preach kindness as a secular and spiritual truth. As an ideological and tactical product of antebellum evangelical revivalism and reform, as well as the rights revolution of the civil war era, animal kindness became a barometer of free moral agency, higher civilization, and Americanization. Yet given the enormous intersectional diversity of the United States, its empire, and other countries of contact, standards of kindness and cruelty were culturally contingent and therefore controversial: those accused of cruelty invoked their own culturally specific ideas regarding their rights of self-determination to defend culturally specific animal practices, such as cockfighting, bullfighting, songbird consumption, and kosher slaughter that animal protectionists judged repugnant. Animal welfare, therefore, wa-and remains-in the crosshairs of cultural and political contestation in a pluralistic society.